- Joined
- Mar 17, 2003
- Messages
- 2,962
- Reaction score
- 79
I know the corporation that runs the 150 hospitals 1 of which I am affiliated with has met with her personally. They are waiting to see how it pans out, but they are interested. They see it as a way to greatly reduce lab labor and lab supplies. It would help make their stock price soar. As long as I still get to bill PCCL, I don't care.Yeah, I know. They basically are building a lab business with different instruments, slightly less blood, and probably equivalent (or worse given need for couriers) TAT for the majority of tests. REVOLUTIONARY.
If the machines truly are revolutionary they would most likely be offered to all labs, not just Walgreens.
Here is another good article about the technology and inventor. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...edles-inspired-invent-new-way-test-blood.html
Last edited: