- Joined
- May 11, 2017
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi guys,
I wanted to get some advice on how to approach interview questions that are politically and financially touchy subjects. For example, a possible interview question may be how I feel about the current healthcare system, what problems it has, and what I would propose in order to fix the issue. I personally believe that 1) we have to abandon the fee for service system and move towards a pay for performance model in order to increase accountability of healthcare providers so that we can lower the cost of healthcare and 2) we have to lower the barriers of entry into the medical profession from a financial standpoint by decreasing the cost of medical school and the application fees in order to increase the supply of doctors in the country to meet the increasing demand. I'm worried, however, that my answers may conflict with what is in the best interest of a current physician/interviewer as both points would decrease the income of a physician in the long run. Should I stay clear of such an answer or do you think these are legitimate points to raise?
Another possible question may be how I feel about nationalized healthcare. I personally am a strong proponent for universal health care, but seeing how this is a politically charged topic, should I make an effort to highlight both sides of the argument or should I stick to what I truly believe in?
I wanted to get some advice on how to approach interview questions that are politically and financially touchy subjects. For example, a possible interview question may be how I feel about the current healthcare system, what problems it has, and what I would propose in order to fix the issue. I personally believe that 1) we have to abandon the fee for service system and move towards a pay for performance model in order to increase accountability of healthcare providers so that we can lower the cost of healthcare and 2) we have to lower the barriers of entry into the medical profession from a financial standpoint by decreasing the cost of medical school and the application fees in order to increase the supply of doctors in the country to meet the increasing demand. I'm worried, however, that my answers may conflict with what is in the best interest of a current physician/interviewer as both points would decrease the income of a physician in the long run. Should I stay clear of such an answer or do you think these are legitimate points to raise?
Another possible question may be how I feel about nationalized healthcare. I personally am a strong proponent for universal health care, but seeing how this is a politically charged topic, should I make an effort to highlight both sides of the argument or should I stick to what I truly believe in?
Last edited: