Dismiss Notice
Hey Guest! Check out the 3 MCAT Study Plan Options listed in the 'stickies' area at the top of the forums (BoomBoom, SN2ed, and MCATJelly). Let us know which you like best.

Also, we now offer a MCAT Test-Prep Exhibitions Forum where you can ask questions directly from the test-prep services.

TPR bio vs. EK bio? Which is more "realistic"?

Discussion in 'MCAT Discussions' started by unsung, May 26, 2008.

  1. unsung

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2007
    Messages:
    1,356
    Likes Received:
    13
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    Just started doing the EK 1001Qs for bio & it strikes me as so different from the TPR bio passages we did in prep class. TPR seemed waaay harder to me as their passages were so long and a lot of them involved complicated experiments, or experimental techniques I had no understanding of. EK seems more content-focused.

    Which is more like the real deal? Should I be worried about passages involving lots of experimentation/interpreting experiments?
     
  2. Thread continues after this sponsor message. SDN Members do not see this ad.

  3. cbrons

    cbrons Ratatoskr! *Roar*

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    6,577
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Status:
    Non-Student
    Id really love to know the answer to this too....
     
  4. JA Prufrock

    JA Prufrock Serenity Now!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2008
    Messages:
    329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Pre-Medical
    Though I haven't started working through either of them, what I have read on this board leads me to believe that TPR is more indicative of the actual test, while EK's bio 101 is meant more to solidify understanding of concepts than to provide an accurate representation of test questions.
     

Share This Page