try not to attack

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

kocker

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2009
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I know this may sound absolutely insane to most but, have any of you, or have you known anyone, to do an intern year in medicine prior to starting surgery... and doing another intern year in gs?

it may sound absolutely torturous but its sort of the way of old... like halstead and cushing, you did a year in medicine and then started your surgical career. It seems to me that there is too much tunnel vision in the current system.

Sometimes I feel like I have a lot to learn and might miss out on some of it going straight to a gs residency even though i know that ultimately thats what I want.

Or maybe a year with 6 months medicine 6 months research, alternating months between research and floors..... just a strange creation i guess.

Then I guess the question becomes.... how do you convince PDs that you didn't just not match or something....
 
I think it would be a bit of a waste of time. A good surgical training program should give you the medical rotations you need to be a well trained surgeon. A month elective doing pre-op medical consults would beef things up if you're still feeling week.

Surgical training is long enough with all the added research blocks and with restricted work hours. Stream-lining training is the way to go rather than adding in extra years.
 
I know this may sound absolutely insane to most but, have any of you, or have you known anyone, to do an intern year in medicine prior to starting surgery... and doing another intern year in gs?

it may sound absolutely torturous but its sort of the way of old... like halstead and cushing, you did a year in medicine and then started your surgical career. It seems to me that there is too much tunnel vision in the current system.

Sometimes I feel like I have a lot to learn and might miss out on some of it going straight to a gs residency even though i know that ultimately thats what I want.

Or maybe a year with 6 months medicine 6 months research, alternating months between research and floors..... just a strange creation i guess.

Then I guess the question becomes.... how do you convince PDs that you didn't just not match or something....


Although your quest for knowledge and drive to alwyas know more is admirable....i must say......:slap:

I cant wait to start surgical residency....and doing a medicine Sub-I makes me realize how even more I would be miserable being stuck on the floors day in and day out for a year strait. I can only hope what Tussy said........

A good surgical training program should give you the medical rotations you need to be a well trained surgeon.

.....is true at the program I end up at. I think if you are careful with where to apply and very attentive as well as ask a ton of questions at interviews, you should be able to end up at a program that will fulfill what you are looking for.

Good luck with your decision, i hope you find what you are looking for with this thread.
 
I think it would be a bit of a waste of time. A good surgical training program should give you the medical rotations you need to be a well trained surgeon. A month elective doing pre-op medical consults would beef things up if you're still feeling week.

Surgical training is long enough with all the added research blocks and with restricted work hours. Stream-lining training is the way to go rather than adding in extra years.

I agree with Tussy. You should focus more on finding an excellent surgical program. This will provide you with plenty of training in dealing with "medical problems."

Many programs don't have the tunnel vision you mentioned, and their residents feel comfortable managing plenty of medical problems in their patients. They very rarely need to consult medicine for any patient management.

Of course, we should never mistake ourselves for experts, much like we don't want others saying or thinking they can do surgery without the proper training. However, a well-trained general surgeon is the last true man-of-all-seasons in the hospital, and a strong training program can give you the skills to play that role.
 
a well-trained general surgeon is the last true man-of-all-seasons in the hospital, and a strong training program can give you the skills to play that role.

this is a very true and profound quote.

do NOT do a medicine year just to be "better" A surgical internship will teach you more about medicine than an entire 3 yr residency in medicine.

However, I do know several people who have done medical internships prior to gen surg residency. They were DO's who had to fulful the rotating internship requirement to be licensed in certain states.
 
A surgical internship will teach you more about medicine than an entire 3 yr residency in medicine.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

*sniffle*

GAWDAMN that's funny...
 
In what specific way would spending a year in medicine (instead of surgery) be helpful in becoming a better surgeon?
 
The original poster would do well to observe what it is that medicine interns actually do on the wards.

1. Dictate H&Ps with plans that their second years came up with
2. Write long daily notes that say essentially the same thing, e.g., "continue after load reduction", "continue DVT/GI prophylaxis", "replete lytes".
3. Call consults/order labs/follow up on things that their seniors tell them to
4. Disposition patients
5. Dictate discharge summaries

What do surgery interns do? The same thing. Except the H&Ps, notes, and discharge summaries aren't inundated with worthless garbage details that no one cares about. And sometimes they get to do a case or two. And they don't sign out their service to the on call person at 2PM. Most importantly they learn not to panic.
 
I know a resident who did this. He convinced himself that he would sacrifice his dream of being a surgeon for the better lifestyle an internal medicine career could give him...and realized first year he'd made a horrible, horrible mistake. Switched into a general surgery program the next year. Talking to him, the gist I get is, he gets maybe some benefit from it but definitely not worth the extra year.
 
The original poster would do well to observe what it is that medicine interns actually do on the wards.

1. Dictate H&Ps with plans that their second years came up with
2. Write long daily notes that say essentially the same thing, e.g., "continue after load reduction", "continue DVT/GI prophylaxis", "replete lytes".
3. Call consults/order labs/follow up on things that their seniors tell them to
4. Disposition patients
5. Dictate discharge summaries

What do surgery interns do? The same thing. Except the H&Ps, notes, and discharge summaries aren't inundated with worthless garbage details that no one cares about. And sometimes they get to do a case or two. And they don't sign out their service to the on call person at 2PM. Most importantly they learn not to panic.

Thanks for everyone's reply.

I agree that there is a lot of worthless crap that goes along with being a medicine intern but in my experience the exercise a great deal more freedom with detemining a diagnosis and plan than described above. Not to mention I think a month of id, endo, micu ( though I haven't done sicu) and renal would be helpful in becoming the 'man for all seasons'.

As far as need for this experience, perhaps my home be program is just not measuring up.

The other part of my initial post was the intermixed year of rotations and research, sort of a fourth year with out the pressure of the match and some more research time. To my knowledge this doesn't exist....

I guess I love the or but not to the exclusion of the rest of medicine.

Disclaimer- this probably would never really happen as my wife would kill me in my sleep for ADDING years to my training.

Then again maybe a couple subi's can give me a lot of this experience.
 
So this is getting me thinking about a related grievance that I have with text early subspecialization. I guess I wish I could easily get a few good years of gs in and still jump into other fields. In mho the most creativity and innovation comes from when you put people with different backgrounds together on the same problem.

Now the paths to different surg specialties are so divergent. For example I am thinking about neurosurg but I just don't know yet and wish it was easier to jump around. I guess training paths are just too long now.

Maybe I am just freaked about making a career decision that feels so final.

Sorry fir dragging you all on my ramble 🙂
 
We should all have a pretty reasonable exposure to medicine, because it's a requirement in medical school. I've spent a total of 5 months in medicine and its subspecialties, one of which was a sub-I. Everyone should have atleast 3 months or so, in order to graduate from medical school. Similarly, everyone should have some outpatient experience. In fact, I'm much more comfortable with medicine than with a lot of the surgical subspecialties (ENT, Uro, Ortho, Neurosurg). We don't really need to continue to train as generalists after we've been given an MD. It's time to train to be what you will actually be when you're done. As another wise poster once said, "you can't be a stem cell forever."
 
Just another med student chiming in here, but here's my .02:

in my experience the exercise a great deal more freedom with detemining a diagnosis and plan than described above.

Really? Maybe I'm biased (and I admittedly have a small sample size), but it seems like the upper level surgery residents are a lot more comfortable developing a treatment plan and executing it than upper level medicine residents, who seem to rely heavily on their attendings for every detail of the plan.


Not to mention I think a month of id, endo, micu ( though I haven't done sicu) and renal would be helpful in becoming the 'man for all seasons'.

I think those would all be phenomenally helpful...if you were a medicine resident. You will get plenty of ID in the form of managing post-op infections and managing surgical conditions in immunocompromised patients. You will get plenty of endocrine surgery exposure, and plenty of renal surgery exposure. And you'll probably spend more time than you'd like on SICU and trauma ICU.


As far as need for this experience,

I think the big thing is this - as a med student, you (and I) aren't in a good position to judge what is or isn't needed in our future training. It would be like a pre-med telling the med school administration that what they really need to do is add another semester of biochem to the curriculum.

In your original post, you mentioned how to explain this to a PD - I don't know how you could because what you're basically saying is "I don't think the training that you provide residents is good enough, so I took it upon myself to fix that"
 
Not to mention I think a month of id, endo, micu ( though I haven't done sicu) and renal would be helpful in becoming the 'man for all seasons'.

Actually you will get all this in surg internship and 2nd yr.

For instance, when you are alone in the unit and the first 10 patients with renal failure gets you scared so you call nephrology- all they do is come and order urine lytes, renal ultrasound and lasix drip and write the obligatory "avoid nephrotoxins" -you quickly realize its a scam and start doing all this stuff yourself. only calling them when its time to dialzye someone.

-or cardiology for instance. when you get your 100th afib patient postop you know all they do is order thyroid panel, echo and rate/rythym control +/- anticoagulation/cardioversion. hell, you can do this too!

-ID: start on broad spectrum, culture everything and narrow the focus. stop the abx based on clinical improvement and your developed time. for instance- pneumonia 10 day course, line infection 14 day course, etc..

get the picture- surgeons are well trained and consultants arent necessary for these mundane things. it wastes their time & money is waste too.

of course, when you get your septic patient with perforated bowel in a person with renal transplant and fontan circulation, then thats when you need help from your colleagues.
 
Esu your post is very reassuring. I guess as an ms3 we don't see quite all you guys get up to. I think I am going to do a sicu elective this fall and from the sounds of it, I will get what I'm looking for.

As far as being like a premed and trying to dictate the curriculum....

I guess I fail to see the blasphemy in taking an active approach towards my education rather than just following blindly.
 
I guess I fail to see the blasphemy in taking an active approach towards my education rather than just following blindly.

I don't think it's a bad thing to take an active approach to your education. But then note your earlier statement in the same post:

I guess as an ms3 we don't see quite all you guys get up to. I think I am going to do a sicu elective this fall and from the sounds of it, I will get what I'm looking for.

You're exactly right with that statement - students don't always have the best grasp of what a residency education really entails, and trying to make a radical decision like doing an extra intern year based on your current perspective as a 3rd year seems short sighted. That was why I made the pre-med analogy.

If you're interested in taking an active role in your education - do it fourth year. I'm going to take a medicine GI elective because I find a lot of that pathology (IBD, liver disease) interesting and would like to be a bit more comfortable with the current medical therapies. But I think trying to reinvent the wheel is a bit over the top.
 
So this is getting me thinking about a related grievance that I have with text early subspecialization. I guess I wish I could easily get a few good years of gs in and still jump into other fields. In mho the most creativity and innovation comes from when you put people with different backgrounds together on the same problem.

Just a quick point about the early specialization programs -- realize that many of them allow more breadth in the area in which it is useful to be broad. For example, with the traditional route, a cardiac surgeon does 5-7 years of general surgery, then 2-3 years of cardiac surgery fellowship. While they have a lot of breadth within surgery (e.g., they can do a Whipple and manage the patient pre and postop), they don't do cardiology rotations. The integrated programs in cardiac surgery (N=2) include rotations with cardiology. To use your neurosurgery example, they give up the surgical breadth of general surgery, but they have more time to do neurology, neuroradiology, etc. Interventional radiology integrated programs have a significant amount of time on general surgery and medicine services -- which is good, because unlike a radiologist they are in a direct patient care specialty (but the don't get to do a full radiology residency, then specialize).

Completely unrelated, but also important, medicine and surgery are culturally very different. Doing an internship in medicine really would leave you with a lot to unlearn, and not just the length of your notes. Medicine residents tend to be more afraid than surgical residents in the same situations (some rotations are shared at my institution), and indeed this seems on some level to be purposeful and useful. A good surgeon stays calm when blood is hitting the ceiling, and good internist is deeply concerned about a blood pressure of 160/110. On the other hand, doing a few off service rotations as an intern could be useful; the medicine people tend to do a lot more formal teaching. Most surgery residents pick up what to do for renal failure by informally watching what our consultants do and asking questions, whereas the medicine residents are taught via formal lectures and teaching rounds what to do about it.

Best,
Anka
 
this is a very true and profound quote.

do NOT do a medicine year just to be "better" A surgical internship will teach you more about medicine than an entire 3 yr residency in medicine.

However, I do know several people who have done medical internships prior to gen surg residency. They were DO's who had to fulful the rotating internship requirement to be licensed in certain states.

wow thats ahigh for prententious bullsh#t even for sdn.
 
The integrated programs in cardiac surgery (N=2) include rotations with cardiology. To use your neurosurgery example, they give up the surgical breadth of general surgery, but they have more time to do neurology, neuroradiology, etc. Interventional radiology integrated programs have a significant amount of time on general surgery and medicine services -- which is good, because unlike a radiologist they are in a direct patient care specialty

I think what you said actually points out what I really like with things like ns and ct combined and that is that they work in other things like rads and cardiology. I wish the same thing applied for gs... maybe it does and I just don't know.

As far as the culture, i think this is a strong point. The cultural difference is large and in fact the culture of surgery is one of the stronger draws for me.

I am sort of throwing this whole thread out there as a pros and cons. As I mentioned before I don't think I could ever do this. I simply lament the fact that there isn't more integration as in ns and combined ct. The training seems very complete. But as said above, there is a lot that I don't know.

As you maybe able to tell by my long winded posts, I am in medicine now.

thanks all
 
The original poster would do well to observe what it is that medicine interns actually do on the wards.

1. Dictate H&Ps with plans that their second years came up with
2. Write long daily notes that say essentially the same thing, e.g., "continue after load reduction", "continue DVT/GI prophylaxis", "replete lytes".
3. Call consults/order labs/follow up on things that their seniors tell them to
4. Disposition patients
5. Dictate discharge summaries

What do surgery interns do? The same thing. Except the H&Ps, notes, and discharge summaries aren't inundated with worthless garbage details that no one cares about. And sometimes they get to do a case or two. And they don't sign out their service to the on call person at 2PM. Most importantly they learn not to panic.

Don't forget the rounding four times per day for medicine.
 
this is a very true and profound quote.

do NOT do a medicine year just to be "better" A surgical internship will teach you more about medicine than an entire 3 yr residency in medicine.

However, I do know several people who have done medical internships prior to gen surg residency. They were DO's who had to fulful the rotating internship requirement to be licensed in certain states.

LOL. As someone who has absolutely no interest in either field, but who did do a transitional year where I was exposed to both GSURG and Medicine, I can tell you this is absolutely laughable. While there is some overlap, surgery and medicine fulfill very different roles in the hospital. The skill sets that residents in each specialty acquire is also quite different. I would definitely rather have an IM resident managing my diabetes, hypertension, CHF, etc. over a general surgeon. You think those conditions are easy to manage, but there are a lot of nuances to treatment that you just don't pick up unless you do a medicine residency.
 
Don't forget also, that doing a different internship or switching fields causes you to lose years of funding. By starting out in Gen Surg, you can be guaranteed 6 years of residency funding. If you did a categorical medicine year first, then you would only have 3 years of full funding of which you've already used 1, since IM is only 3 years thats what you will be assigned, leaving you with only 1/2 the funding each year for pgy3-6. This can be an issue with certain programs and hospitals and they may look less favorably at someone who has used portions of their alloted funding. Doing a defined prelim or transitional year means you will be assigned to the time period of whatever you join PGY2 but you will be 1 year short so for your final year you would only receive 1/2 the funding. These are little known facts that often cause a lot of people problems.
 
sorry, i miss wrote that. 5 is the max allotment (IRP) for any residency, and only surgery and surgical specialty residents are assigned 5 years of medicare funding: gen surg, ent, uro, ortho, ns, PRS, etc.

people in rads and anesthesia can get up to 5 fully funded years also because the way its written the transitional year doesn't count against medicare funding so long as they start a specialty that requires a separate internship year ie rads, anesthesia, pmr, derm, ophtho etc. and their time allotment is determined by what they start PGY2. for example, they have their TY, then they receive an IRP allotment of 4 when they start rads.
 
I know this may sound absolutely insane to most but, have any of you, or have you known anyone, to do an intern year in medicine prior to starting surgery... and doing another intern year in gs?

it may sound absolutely torturous but its sort of the way of old... like halstead and cushing, you did a year in medicine and then started your surgical career. It seems to me that there is too much tunnel vision in the current system.

Sometimes I feel like I have a lot to learn and might miss out on some of it going straight to a gs residency even though i know that ultimately thats what I want.

Or maybe a year with 6 months medicine 6 months research, alternating months between research and floors..... just a strange creation i guess.

Then I guess the question becomes.... how do you convince PDs that you didn't just not match or something....

I think it would be a bit of a waste of time. A good surgical training program should give you the medical rotations you need to be a well trained surgeon. A month elective doing pre-op medical consults would beef things up if you're still feeling week.

Surgical training is long enough with all the added research blocks and with restricted work hours. Stream-lining training is the way to go rather than adding in extra years.

I agree with Tussy in that a good surgery residency program will give you all of the medicine that you need to be a good surgeon. You will be quite surprised at how much general medicine you just "pick up" while you are doing your duties as a surgical intern. There is really no need to undergo the torture of "standing around" in rounds for endless hours listening to medical trivia to deliver good patient care.

Keep up with your reading (read regularly) and you should be fine even if you believe that you forgot something. In the days of Halsted (and Cushing), there wasn't an internet so you have everything medical literally at your fingertips that will need on a regular basis. You don't need a year of medicine and you need all of the surgical experience that you can get. Those residency years fly by quickly.
 
LOL. As someone who has absolutely no interest in either field, but who did do a transitional year where I was exposed to both GSURG and Medicine, I can tell you this is absolutely laughable. While there is some overlap, surgery and medicine fulfill very different roles in the hospital. The skill sets that residents in each specialty acquire is also quite different. I would definitely rather have an IM resident managing my diabetes, hypertension, CHF, etc. over a general surgeon. You think those conditions are easy to manage, but there are a lot of nuances to treatment that you just don't pick up unless you do a medicine residency.

The culture of my home institution must be different from your institution because most of the medicine guys I know will consult out when faced with difficult cases of renal failure, CHF, etc. and let someone else handle the "nuances to treatment." In fact, the assessment/plan of one hospitalist I know literally reads acute renal failure: consult renal, anemia: consult GI, CHF: consult cards, etc.
 
Don't forget also, that doing a different internship or switching fields causes you to lose years of funding. By starting out in Gen Surg, you can be guaranteed 6 years of residency funding. If you did a categorical medicine year first, then you would only have 3 years of full funding of which you've already used 1, since IM is only 3 years thats what you will be assigned, leaving you with only 1/2 the funding each year for pgy3-6. This can be an issue with certain programs and hospitals and they may look less favorably at someone who has used portions of their alloted funding. Doing a defined prelim or transitional year means you will be assigned to the time period of whatever you join PGY2 but you will be 1 year short so for your final year you would only receive 1/2 the funding. These are little known facts that often cause a lot of people problems.

So very very true
 
The original poster would do well to observe what it is that medicine interns actually do on the wards.

I'm doing a Transitional Year so I've done Surgery and Medicine.

1. Dictate H&Ps with plans that their second years came up with

I come up with my own plans. Surgery residents dictate H&P's as well.

On my last surgery rotation, the attending told us on the first day he was annoyed with a former resident who said that surgeons don't have to take a "Social History" so he didn't ask patients if they drank or smoked. He stressed that he wanted good H&P's. My experience in medical school was also that Surgery notes aren't "EZ mode", and if you try to take shortcuts you eventually get in trouble. Maybe the assessment and plan section isn't as long compared to Internal Medicine, but that only takes an extra thirty seconds to write.

S- No new complaints
O - Vitals
Gen - Awake, alert, NAD
CV - RRR
Lungs - CTA B
Abd - Soft, tender, decreased BS, inc cdi
Ext - Warm, NT
Labs
A+P 50 yo WF s/p appendectomy POD #1
1) S/P surgery - Continue abx.
2) Pain control - morphine
3) Diet - advance as tolerated

Maybe you can skip heart and lung exam, but a lot of attendings don't like it.

vs.

S - SOB overnight. No other complains
O - Vitals
Gen,
CV,
Lungs,
Abd,
Ext
Labs
A+P 76 yo WM with dementia, COPD, CHF, admitted with recurrent A. Fib.
1) A. Fib - Continue Cardizem drip. Switch to PO. Continue Warfarin
2) COPD - aerosols, steroids, abx.
3) CHF - Lasix
4) Prophylaxis - Warfarin as above. Omeprazole.

What's true is that in Surgery, many of the patients that you get called to see are consults. But new consults still demand an H&P. You can cheat a little bit by copying the primary team's H&P. But even on Internal Medicine, 80% of the patient's that we get are nearing the end of their lives, present frequently, and have old H&P's in the computer which you can cheat off of.

2. Write long daily notes that say essentially the same thing, e.g., "continue after load reduction", "continue DVT/GI prophylaxis", "replete lytes".

My notes on Surgery weren't much different than my notes on Internal Medicine. The time consuming part on both is getting the vitals and the labs. The examination of the patient takes 1 minute on either. Surgery attendings that I've worked with at multiple institutions don't like it if you take shortcuts with the morning progress note. The days of "continue current plan" are over. OTOH, on either rotation you don't need to write out the name of every single medication the patient is on and their use. "Continue home meds." can suffice.

3. Call consults/order labs/follow up on things that their seniors tell them to

I've never personally called a consult. Ordering labs takes seconds on a computer. Surgery residents also order labs.

4. Disposition patients

Surgery has these too.

5. Dictate discharge summaries

Surgery has these too, though perhaps not as many due to many patients being consults. Anyway, from one month of Internal Medicine I usually have about 15-20 discharge summaries (and this is on a busy service) which isn't too bad

What do surgery interns do? The same thing. Except the H&Ps, notes, and discharge summaries aren't inundated with worthless garbage details that no one cares about.

Again, as someone who has done both Surgery H&P's and notes are a little bit shorter, but not that much shorter.

And sometimes they get to do a case or two.

If you don't care about this, it's not much of a bonus. 😴

And they don't sign out their service to the on call person at 2PM.

This is a bad thing? :laugh: Hey look on Surgery or Medicine, if people can bail early on a slow day they take it.

Most importantly they learn not to panic.

Not sure about this. The month of surgery that I did, the intern was responsible for new patients at night while the second year night float responded to the floor pages. I would imagine any intern going through this emerges not knowing jack **** about routine patient issues, until they become a second year.

Maybe it's not like this everywhere. But what I do know is that in PM&R which I'm going into, and which takes on a lot of post-surgical patients, the TY and Prelim-Medicine trained people tend to have an easier time on call than the Prelim-Surgery trained people.

A good surgeon stays calm when blood is hitting the ceiling,

No that's when they throw instruments at the scrub tech, and blame the medical student holding the retractor for all their problems in life. I kid, I kid.

and good internist is deeply concerned about a blood pressure of 160/110.

Anyone who gets called at night about hypertension should treat it and will treat, on pain of getting written up by the nurses. On Surgery, if they get the call, that means it's a primary patient for them, otherwise they usually don't get the call. They typically do Metoprolol PRN or something. An IM resident at night might also do Hydralazine 10mg PRN q4h. But on Medicine, they would change it the next day to a more permanent solution. On Surgery, they typically just leave it as PRN IV Metoprolol, until the patient leaves the hospital and presumably gets hypertensive again, which isn't really good patient care.

Don't forget the rounding four times per day for medicine.

100% BS stereotype that I've not witnessed at the academic teaching hospitals, large community hospitals, and small community hospital settings where I've done Internal Medicine so far as a medical student and resident, in a few different cities no less. The typical routine is come in at 7, see a few patients, write some notes, round with the attending from 9/10 until 12. Then go get lunch. Then put in orders, discharge people, and admit folks if you get called.

The painful thing about surgery is that you have to come in at 6 (or sooner), round, see your patients before the senior resident starts his cases at 7 to 7:30. At different points in the day, different surgeons will come and will want to round on their patients. If they're awfully nice, sometimes they'll also see their partners patients. Even then though, sometimes they don't do this until 5 p.m. or later, which keeps you stuck in the hospital. Sometimes your senior resident can insist on rounding a second time before leaving at the end of the day. Overall, I've rounded many more times on Surgery than in Internal Medicine.

There's other advantages to Internal Medicine too, like caps on patients and consults. One day on Surgery I had to see 12 consults, since there's no caps. On Medicine, the most number of patients they'll make you pick up is capped at 5. Our progress notes are capped at 5. On either rotation, I spent an average of about 1 hour working up a new patient.
 
Last edited:
I'm doing a Transitional Year so I've done Surgery and Medicine.

I think you totally missed the point of my posting. I was trying to say that there isn't much difference between a medicine internship and a surgical internship in terms of the things you have to learn to do. Except that in surgery you get to do some cases and you don't have to deal with annoying things like rounding until noon.

By the end of my intern year, I could go toe to toe with any medicine resident in terms of taking care of sick patients. Sure, there would be stylistic differences but physiology is physiology. Do the right thing and the patient gets better.

In fact, at my program, we have a combined med/surg ICU where second year surgery and medicine residents supervise medicine interns. For the most part, morning rounds on my post call days pretty much always went smoothly -- no glaring problems with patient management overnight. I can't say the same for some for some of the medicine PGY2s I was on with.

The bottom line, to address the original poster's question, is that you'll learn all the medicine you need in a good surgery program. A well trained general surgeon, as someone so aptly put, is the last remaining jack of all trades in the modern hospital.

I would argue that if all the general internists went on strike for a week, general surgeons could hold down the fort.
 
My program involves a medicine rotation and, sponch, you're right in that you could go toe-to-toe with any medical resident (even their PGY3s) with regard to caring for sick patients. Heck, it wouldn't even be a contest. But what they know how to do and we aren't as good at is taking care of patients who aren't sick yet, or who are done being sick. Once we get out of flash pulmonary edema, which I'm better at getting someone out of, I'm not very good at make sure they are on all the right chronic meds, setting up follow up appointments, blah blah blah. And the reason I'm not good at it? Because I haven't been doing it for the last eight months. I've been learning to take care of sick patients. And guess what? I'm GLAD there are medical people who are interested in this kind of stuff, because I'm really not. I think the big point is that a surgical residency leaves you prepared to do surgery. A medical residency leaves you prepared to do a fellowship, or do primary care.

Best,
Anka
 
You don't call your own consults? So you let the unit clerk or the nurse call another physician and hope that they can figure out what they want the consultant to do with your patient?

I was thinking the same thing. Its odd if a resident doesn't call his own consults.

Its a MAJOR mistake to let the unit clerk, a nurse, the medical student or even the intern (who probably doesn't understand) call the consult. I find it particularly frustrating now in practice when I get these phone calls because the above know nothing and I have no choice but to come in now and see the patient because you can't trust the messenger.
 
Our hospitals have started a BIG push with physicians to get them to call their consultants personally. There will soon be some sort of discipline to physicians who do not call consultants, especially after hours. There are a couple of groups of physicians who will REFUSE a consult without physician to physician communication and the Medical Executive Committee is backing them up.
 
this is a very true and profound quote.

do NOT do a medicine year just to be "better" A surgical internship will teach you more about medicine than an entire 3 yr residency in medicine.

However, I do know several people who have done medical internships prior to gen surg residency. They were DO's who had to fulful the rotating internship requirement to be licensed in certain states.

Well, I happen to agree.

In my experience the medicine intern learns how to write a note and consult.

Renal failure- Consult nephrology
CHF- Consult cardiology
Constipation-Consult surgery😱
diabetes-consult endocrine
Leukocytosis-consult ID

I haven't seen a medicine team actually manage anything in several years. What I have seen them do is admit a patient and consult every service possible, and they never actually call the consults. They leave that to the unit secretary (because they don't want to have to answer for the inappropriate consults for constipation etc).

While the surgical service doesn't consult unless it is a complex case (DM that is difficult to control etc).

They at least attempt to do something before they consult. They may not have the best long term plan (but many times they do), but they can fix the patient while they are in house and get them back to their PCP who presumably can come up with a good long term plan.
 
Well, if they don't do anything then why do you keep consulting them?

We usually get 1-2 consults for "medical management" from Orthopedic surgery and to a lesser extent General surgery each day. These consults are absolute garbage. It's a pure money racket between one group that gets paid a flat fee for just doing the operation and flat out doesn't give a damn about doing one second of work more than that, and another group that pockets $200 for doing almost zero work. Rising healthcare costs be damned.

I think we were maybe 2 weeks into residency before we figured out that actually doing an H&P with a proper assessment on these patients was a complete waste of time. In fact now we spend about 15 minutes on them tops. You pick up the chart. You go in the room and read back the surgeon's history which was written by the PA or NP to the delirious post-surgical patient. You put the stethoscope here and there. Then you go back out and dictate the PA/NP's history into the phone. :laugh: Afterwards, you open up the EHR and go "click, click, click" on the home medications. Many days we don't even bother to round on these patients because it's such a waste of time. 😴

So is it any wonder that they don't respect you or even your consult business, and are happy just to call in more consults on your patients? I don't think so. And if you know as much about medicine as they do, then why do you keep asking them to do your "medical management" (i.e. restarting home meds)?
 
Last edited:
Well, if they don't do anything then why do you keep consulting them?

We usually get 1-2 consults for "medical management" from Orthopedic surgery and to a lesser extent General surgery each day. These consults are absolute garbage. It's a pure money racket between one group that gets paid a flat fee for just doing the operation and flat out doesn't give a damn about doing one second of work more than that, and another group that pockets $200 for doing almost zero work. Rising healthcare costs be damned.

I think we were maybe 2 weeks into residency before we figured out that actually doing an H&P with a proper assessment on these patients was a complete waste of time. In fact now we spend about 15 minutes on them tops. You pick up the chart. You go in the room and read back the surgeon's history which was written by the PA or NP to the delirious post-surgical patient. You put the stethoscope here and there. Then you go back out and dictate the PA/NP's history into the phone. :laugh: Afterwards, you open up the EHR and go "click, click, click" on the home medications. Many days we don't even bother to round on these patients because it's such a waste of time. 😴

So is it any wonder that they don't respect you or even your consult business, and are happy just to call in more consults on your patients? I don't think so. And if you know as much about medicine as they do, then why do you keep asking them to do your "medical management" (i.e. restarting home meds)?

Well, I don't know that you can really justify a half-@ssed workup, regardless of how little you care, or how trivial it seems. You may get away with your crappy doctoring 99 times out of 100, but on the 100th time, your patient will die.....then you can just blame it on the surgeon.

I think that Orthopaedic surgery is way more guilty of this behavior than general surgery. If the General surgeons are doing it too, and there's a residency program associated with it, please let us know where you are training, so we can dissuade future surgery residents from training there.

I have to make a few points here. First of all, I think that there are bad apples in all specialties, and we can all come up with examples about an incompetent IM doc, or a clueless surgeon. If you don't want to end up as one of those bad apples, you have to be thorough in your work, and avoid the above-mentioned shortcuts.

Secondly, you are still training, so I don't know that you necessarily possess all of the required faculty to say a consult is "absolute garbage." The worst attitude you can bring into the clinical arena when facing a problem is "It's probably nothing."

Lastly, while it may be frustrating to manage simple problems for the orthopods, remember how silly they find some of your bone-specific consults. And also remember that the majority of them gleefully announce their ignorance to other areas of medicine. I personally don't want them even trying to manage diabetes, etc, because they can make some big mistakes, which you would then have to clean up.

-----an endnote regarding the last paragraph, which extends to all specialties crying about consults: If you are going to complain about their workup or patient care, then you can't complain when they ask you to do it. This happens all the time when IM docs joke about the surgeon struggling with HTN, or the surgeons joke about the ER doc's workup of abdominal pain.....
 
Well, if they don't do anything then why do you keep consulting them?

We usually get 1-2 consults for "medical management" from Orthopedic surgery and to a lesser extent General surgery each day. These consults are absolute garbage. It's a pure money racket between one group that gets paid a flat fee for just doing the operation and flat out doesn't give a damn about doing one second of work more than that, and another group that pockets $200 for doing almost zero work. Rising healthcare costs be damned.

I think we were maybe 2 weeks into residency before we figured out that actually doing an H&P with a proper assessment on these patients was a complete waste of time. In fact now we spend about 15 minutes on them tops. You pick up the chart. You go in the room and read back the surgeon's history which was written by the PA or NP to the delirious post-surgical patient. You put the stethoscope here and there. Then you go back out and dictate the PA/NP's history into the phone. :laugh: Afterwards, you open up the EHR and go "click, click, click" on the home medications. Many days we don't even bother to round on these patients because it's such a waste of time. 😴

So is it any wonder that they don't respect you or even your consult business, and are happy just to call in more consults on your patients? I don't think so. And if you know as much about medicine as they do, then why do you keep asking them to do your "medical management" (i.e. restarting home meds)?

Um you would have to consult them first, which we DON'T (general surgery here) so your first question is invalid.

Usually if we consult someone it is nephrology/cardiology/endocrine becasue it is complex and medicine would just consult them anyway without providing valuable input. It is extremely rare for us to consult medicine.

It's not a matter of them "respecting us", they just don't do anything except consult, and they don't even call those, they don't call ortho, cardiology, or anybody else either. We speculate it's becasue they don't want to answer the question of "it's constipation, exactly why do you think it's surgical?" They just want to dictate an H&P and move on to the next one on their list. I have been the 5th consult on the list and the first one to actually lay hands on the patient. Matter of fact it is a pretty common thing for the surgical consultant to be the first person to actually examine the patient. The consult orders are placed before they actually see the patient.

We provide the "medical management" you speak of, with very rare exception our requests for consults are for specialists due to it being a complex issue that we had difficulty managing.
 
Last edited:
In my experience the medicine intern learns how to write a note and consult.

Renal failure- Consult nephrology
CHF- Consult cardiology
Constipation-Consult surgery😱
diabetes-consult endocrine
Leukocytosis-consult ID

Wow...I have never seen these type of notes from Medicine Residents/Interns at academic hospitals. These must be private community hospitals with private attendings... This type of management would be completely unacceptable at academic medical centers (at least the ones in Southern California, of which I've worked at several). If this is happening at an academic residency program, shut down that program immediately.

I have seen something similar to what you describe at a private hospital, where it was private Internists who would see 50 patients a day with their PA in tow, write 3 line Assessment/Plans and consult out anything remotely out of the ordinary. However, everyone was happy with this arrangement, because the specialists would get a ton of easy consults and just make more money.

The Medicine residents at every academic program I've seen will come up with their own management (intern coming up with initial plan, then going over it with the senior) and will do their own procedures (central lines, paras, thoras, LPs, etc) Only if a patient is getting worse and a specialized procedure is needed, are consults ever called. (Pulm for bronchoalveolar lavage, Renal for urgent dialysis etc) And it is always the intern or resident who would call the consult; the idea of a Nurse calling is mind-boggling to me.

The hospitals I've been at Medicine does get a ton of consults; in fact, they will often times be the Primary team for many surgery patients, especially for patients admitted for hip/femur fractures if they're over 60 or have a medical problem, with Ortho being the consulting service. I guess it just goes to show how much the culture varies from hospital to hospital.
 
twizzlers' post has it right.

It always amazes me how those in Surgery have no real clue as to what those in Medicine do and what their responsibilities actually are.
 
twizzler's comment is half-right...Ortho is well known, as noted above, to consult medicine for almost anything. Please do not lump general surgeons into the group "surgeons" when you are including subspecialists who pride themselves on not knowing any medicine. Any self-respecting general surgeon or surgery resident would not consult medicine. It does not mean we don't respect what they do, but in most cases we feel it isn't necessary except in the most complex situations.

It is true that general surgeons in private practice will often consult out the wazoo, largely a reflection, IMHO, of referral based consulting, but in academic hospitals? Never seen it except for very complex problems. I used to be embarassed when moonlighting at a community hospital to call some of the consults the attendings wanted me to call for routine vent management, diabetes, HTN.
 
.........................
 
Last edited:
That's the point Dr. Cox is trying to make.
At both main hospitals in my program, gen surg only consults "general medicine" if the patient has no primary care doctor and needs to establish one (i.e. the patient is going home in the next day or two, but wants us to find them someone to follow them as an outpt), or if we are looking to transfer the patient off our service and back to the pt's original admitting medical service since the surgical issues are resolved. ((I should probably mention that one of the hospitals I am at is a county hospital where a patient with no PCP waits 4 months for the 'system' to get them an appt--hence, if a pt needs primary care f/u and shouldn't wait that long to establish care (on coumadin, newly diagnosed DM, etc.) so we consult medicine to get them in the system.)).

As a surgeon, do I know how to treat HTN and DM? Of course. Do I want to be the one tweaking their Toprol dose and increasing their home insulin doses? NO. I do it in the acute setting. Long term management of these things is best done by a primary care physician.

Now, ortho is a completely different beast from general surgery (as are ENT/GU/Gynes..not all surgical specialties are the same). They will consult for every single little thing, because they just want to operate and getting pages from nurses about blood sugars and BPs of 190/100 annoy them. And frankly, this culture has perpetuated itself to the point that they don't want to try and learn how to deal with "non-skeletal" things. Which, IMO, makes me GLAD they consult people who WILL take care of it and will help the patient.
 
these semantics are basically reflections of how the referral system works at particular places. i've worked at community hospitals where it is the norm to consult. in fact most of the general medicine hospitalists greatly prefer to be consulted for a specific medical issue or issues on surgical patients rather than to have the patient just transferred to their service straight out of the PACU, which is often what super busy surgical services do.

part of the issue is that surgeons do not get any additional reimbursement for rounding and writing notes on their own post-op patients. its all covered in their operating fee. whereas a gen med consultant on that patient will get paid daily per note. another contributor is that by letting the hospitalists involved in the care of their patients opens up their referral bases. if you're feeding a hospitalist steady work and allowing him or his partners to build outpatients, they will refer more of their patients to you etc.

the issue with transferring services is that often post-op patients get transferred to a medicine primary, ie an outpatient will have a procedure, and be admitted under the medicine service instead of the surgeons. sometimes these patients get dropped by the surgeon, and that shouldn't be. good surgeons never drop post-op cases. though patients are now on medicine service, things like managing incisions, drains, bleeding hematomas, advancing diet, etc are better managed by the surgeons. but the patient is still in the hospital and the surgeon can "sign off" basically the way a consultant would. gen surg hardly ever does this but ortho on the other hand is another story.
 
Last edited:
Just another med student chiming in here, but here's my .02:



Really? Maybe I'm biased (and I admittedly have a small sample size), but it seems like the upper level surgery residents are a lot more comfortable developing a treatment plan and executing it than upper level medicine residents, who seem to rely heavily on their attendings for every detail of the plan.




I think those would all be phenomenally helpful...if you were a medicine resident. You will get plenty of ID in the form of managing post-op infections and managing surgical conditions in immunocompromised patients. You will get plenty of endocrine surgery exposure, and plenty of renal surgery exposure. And you'll probably spend more time than you'd like on SICU and trauma ICU.




I think the big thing is this - as a med student, you (and I) aren't in a good position to judge what is or isn't needed in our future training. It would be like a pre-med telling the med school administration that what they really need to do is add another semester of biochem to the curriculum.

In your original post, you mentioned how to explain this to a PD - I don't know how you could because what you're basically saying is "I don't think the training that you provide residents is good enough, so I took it upon myself to fix that"

Well,

May I just say wow! :laugh: I am a PGY-3 in (gasp!!) medicine sitting next to my best friend who is PGY-3 in gen surgery (she is why I am in this forum). I just couldn't help myself but to reply.

First of all, almost every PGY-3 I know in medicine has just as many opinions as the attending, but sometimes, their word is law.

Also, you will get everything you need in a well-structured surgery residency. You will be very capable of handling just about everything that comes your way. An extra year is not necessary for you to become a star in surgery.

Besides, the rounds will kill you....

Good luck!
 
Top