- Joined
- Dec 2, 2016
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 3
Hello all! I have been accepted to all four of these schools and was hoping for suggestions about pros/cons of each school and which school I should attend next fall. I want to attend a school that will give me a great education but also allow me to balance a social life.
Let me know your thoughts please. Thanks so much!!
*I have received a military HPSP 4 year scholarship so cost is not an issue
*Also, I am from Los Angeles, CA so I am familiar with life and weather in SF and LA so those two schools will be easier to adjust to; on the other hand, the two east coast schools will be good opportunity to experience other cities
My thoughts so far:
UCLA
Pros
-Good for specializing (I'll most likely do military specialty not civilian if I end up specializing)
-Great weather/location
-On main undergrad campus
Cons
-H/P/F (hard to differentiate yourself, Colonel told me they like ranks or at least GPA)
-Seems cutthroat academically from talking to some students
-Facilities seem old
-Clinic skills
UCSF
Pros
-Very chill academic environment IMO
-I like that the gym is across the street (good for balance between school and gym)
-Ok location/weather is colder than LA
-Clinic skills
Cons
-P/F (again hard to differentiate)
-Reputation is not overall as well-known
Columbia
Pros
-Great academic education
-Research
-NYC (however its actual location not so much pro)
Cons
-Mainly the intense curriculum (combined with med)
-Clinical skills
-Ranking by thirds (if I end up bottom or middle third)
Penn
Pros
-Great balance clinic/academics, same as UCSF imo
-On the undergrad campus like UCLA
-Dont rank past top 10; also I heard about grade inflation (avg student is 3.7-8ish, which is decent)
-Updating main clinic
Cons
-City of Philly not as great of other 3
-Class size is bigger than the other 3
Let me know your thoughts please. Thanks so much!!
*I have received a military HPSP 4 year scholarship so cost is not an issue
*Also, I am from Los Angeles, CA so I am familiar with life and weather in SF and LA so those two schools will be easier to adjust to; on the other hand, the two east coast schools will be good opportunity to experience other cities
My thoughts so far:
UCLA
Pros
-Good for specializing (I'll most likely do military specialty not civilian if I end up specializing)
-Great weather/location
-On main undergrad campus
Cons
-H/P/F (hard to differentiate yourself, Colonel told me they like ranks or at least GPA)
-Seems cutthroat academically from talking to some students
-Facilities seem old
-Clinic skills
UCSF
Pros
-Very chill academic environment IMO
-I like that the gym is across the street (good for balance between school and gym)
-Ok location/weather is colder than LA
-Clinic skills
Cons
-P/F (again hard to differentiate)
-Reputation is not overall as well-known
Columbia
Pros
-Great academic education
-Research
-NYC (however its actual location not so much pro)
Cons
-Mainly the intense curriculum (combined with med)
-Clinical skills
-Ranking by thirds (if I end up bottom or middle third)
Penn
Pros
-Great balance clinic/academics, same as UCSF imo
-On the undergrad campus like UCLA
-Dont rank past top 10; also I heard about grade inflation (avg student is 3.7-8ish, which is decent)
-Updating main clinic
Cons
-City of Philly not as great of other 3
-Class size is bigger than the other 3
Last edited: