UCSF high priority

[SeventhSon]

---

Members do not see this ad.

Same interview day as me...and I got my "high priority" letter last weekend. I actually will be up in the SF area next week, maybe I'll stop by and do some face-to-face begging. I'm kidding, if its meant to be then it will happen.

oh yeah, i do remember someone saying they were from PB on my interview day. I don't remember anything else about you.

 

[paradisedoc]

Good detective work MM!!! What you say makes a lot of sense. We are still many of us "high priority" but it does iseem to increase our statistical chances a bit.

 

[WhiteRussian]

Just got the "high priority" letter today (interviewed in December). But I'll be withrdawing before they get a chance to put me on a real waitlist. Hope that helps you guys. Good luck! 😉

 

[yellowpersuazio]

I posted this on 3/25 in the UCSF...I'm in...page

Well, I got the letter today... I'm on the high priority boat... and I have a sinking feeling

Has anyone been rejected post-interview??????

if we look at the us news stats... 532 interviewed, 248 accepted, 141 enrolled.... so 248-141=107 (people off of the waiting list that get accepted)
So, lets say that they have 141 people now... 532-141=391 (of us left in high priority limbo). 107/391x100=27%... the letter said that between 20-30% get in off of the "high priority" list.... everyone interviewed (and not yet accepted) are high priority.... 😱

SOOOOOOOO, what do you guys think.... I haven't heard of anyone being rejected post-interview.... someone said they had... but do any of you know anyone (for-sure)?

Wait, how did you get these statistics?

From what I understand, those who are "accepted" are those that get an acceptance, whether it be from after interviews, after being high-priority, or after being waitlisted. The number "enrolled" refers to how many people actually attend the school come fall. So, if you subtract those who are enrolled from those who are accepted, you get the number of people who turned down their acceptance, not the number of people who get accepted after being waitlisted. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

 

[basfan2000]

Wait, how did you get these statistics?

From what I understand, those who are "accepted" are those that get an acceptance, whether it be from after interviews, after being high-priority, or after being waitlisted. The number "enrolled" refers to how many people actually attend the school come fall. So, if you subtract those who are enrolled from those who are accepted, you get the number of people who turned down their acceptance, not the number of people who get accepted after being waitlisted. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

If you assume that the number of initial acceptances is equal to the number of spots, then the # people who turn down acceptances = # people off waitlist that get accepted. If the number of initial acceptances is greater than the number of spots (to account for customary loss to other schools), then the # people who turn down acceptances > # people off waitlist that get accepted, by an amount equal to the overcompensation. I'm not sure under which one of these UCSF falls. Does somebody know? I apologize if I missed it in a previous thread/post.

 

[Rebs]

If you assume that the number of initial acceptances is equal to the number of spots, then the # people who turn down acceptances = # people off waitlist that get accepted. If the number of initial acceptances is greater than the number of spots (to account for customary loss to other schools), then the # people who turn down acceptances > # people off waitlist that get accepted, by an amount equal to the overcompensation. I'm not sure under which one of these UCSF falls. Does somebody know? I apologize if I missed it in a previous thread/post.

I remember the dean saying that they would be accepting more than the allotted spots for the Fall class, since it is inevitable that not everyone will choose to go there. In that case the number of people who turn down acceptances > number of people off waitlist that get accepted. Now that you've reminded me of this, my dreams of UCSF are looking not as hot.

 

[Rebs]

I didn't feel comfortable posting in the "UCSF I'm INNNNN!!!!!" thread since my heart drops every time I see it.

But does anyone know the chain of events that take place once May 15 rolls around. In other words are most of us going to hear something by this date or is it going to be UCSF calling people up in August?

 

[paradisedoc]

I read on SDN (not from anyone official) that on or about May 15th, te high priority list will be divided into accepted, waitlisted, and too far down on the list, so rejected. This also makes sense and I hope it is what they do. Clearly they have put soooo many of us on the high priority category that it is not fair to keep so many of us hopeful when there is no realistic hope. I remember that the letter did not even ask for a response like most wait lists do, it is really just a holding pattern.

 

[discus]

I read on SDN (not from anyone official) that on or about May 15th, te high priority list will be divided into accepted, waitlisted, and too far down on the list, so rejected. This also makes sense and I hope it is what they do. Clearly they have put soooo many of us on the high priority category that it is not fair to keep so many of us hopeful when there is no realistic hope. I remember that the letter did not even ask for a response like most wait lists do, it is really just a holding pattern.

Yes, you're right. They said they like to 'limit' the # of people who get on the waitlist, so there's this other thing called the hold, which essentially guarantees you nothing.

 

[discus]

I read on SDN (not from anyone official) that on or about May 15th, te high priority list will be divided into accepted, waitlisted, and too far down on the list, so rejected. This also makes sense and I hope it is what they do. Clearly they have put soooo many of us on the high priority category that it is not fair to keep so many of us hopeful when there is no realistic hope. I remember that the letter did not even ask for a response like most wait lists do, it is really just a holding pattern.

Yes, you're right. They said they like to 'limit' the # of people who get on the waitlist, so there's this other thing called the hold, which essentially guarantees you nothing. 🙁 🙁 🙁

 

[Rebs]

Thought I'd revive this thread for all of us still in limbo. My question is if any of you know when the committee will be meeting to rank us? In other words do you think we'll hear a decision before the May 15th deadline?

 

[2010MD]

Thought I'd revive this thread for all of us still in limbo. My question is if any of you know when the committee will be meeting to rank us? In other words do you think we'll hear a decision before the May 15th deadline?

I don't have any specific information, but I did meet a Penn M1 at the Penn second look who was accepted off the UCSF "waitlist" (I assume he was referring to the HP list) before May 15 last year. Hope that helps a little.

 

[kirexhana]

Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme Inlemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In

 

[Rebs]

Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme Inlemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In

ditto

 

[browniegirl86]

Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme Inlemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In Lemme In

Yeah, let him in. Do it. Do it.

 

[alpenglow]

spoke with 3 people who withdrew today - good luck!

 

[MNsocsci]

So are there any other people on the high priority list who haven't heard yet? It seems like most people have gotten alternate status/rejection by now. I'm developing a love-hate relationship with my mailbox. I really want to hear from UCSF, but I imagine it's a rejection/bottom half letter at this point. Anyone else still waiting to hear too???

 

[DoctorC]

So are there any other people on the high priority list who haven't heard yet? It seems like most people have gotten alternate status/rejection by now. I'm developing a love-hate relationship with my mailbox. I really want to hear from UCSF, but I imagine it's a rejection/bottom half letter at this point. Anyone else still waiting to hear too???

Just to let people know, they are still accepting from the High Priority List. I just found out today!!!

 

[MNsocsci]

Just to let people know, they are still accepting from the High Priority List. I just found out today!!!

Wow--congratulations! That's so exciting! Are you going to UCSF then? A few questions: did you apply MD only (not MSTP)? In what region of the country do you live? Thanks for giving the rest of us hope!

 

[DoctorC]

Wow--congratulations! That's so exciting! Are you going to UCSF then? A few questions: did you apply MD only (not MSTP)? In what region of the country do you live? Thanks for giving the rest of us hope!

I live in so-cal, I applied for the MD program.

 

[J'kwan]

I live in so-cal, I applied for the MD program.

Great news. Congratulations.