where would i be able to get the abstract published- do you just mean on a poster? and do you think getting accepted to a national conference can be just as hard as a journal? for one conference i saw that they accepted over 1,000 submissions.
my concern about submitting to my university research conference is that no one here is really studying this topic (clinical issue i worked on while abroad, we don't have a med school or health program). it would be better to submit to a conference/journal with more of a focus on this or related topics. and yes i plan to apply to grad schools and if possible i'd like to have a publication for my CV, but i know it's not absolutely necessary
thanks for the responses
Getting your abstract published in a book for a conference is easy. All you have to do is attend the meeting, and as long as you can read/write in English it will be accepted (of course there needs to be SOME validity to your work but not much). This is because abstracts can be for works that are underway, and there can be little/no data presented. The point is that you did work and have something to show for it.
It doesn't really matter where you have your abstract published. It's nice to attend conferences, but if you presented your research at a school symposium there should be an abstract book associated with it. That's really enough. No one is going to care where your work was presented. In interviews they will ask you all about your research, and you will get a chance to go over it.
For a peer- reviewed journal publication you need not just good data, but months of writing and preparation time. The process works as follows:
1. You do a bunch of great work and have significant data. You think it should be published
2. You write a rough draft of your paper. You submit this to your mentor/advisor.
3. Your advisor completely re-writes your paper for you, and tells you to make the necessary changes.
4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 about 6 times.
5. You submit the manuscript to a journal. If it is rejected, you have to rewirte the paper to fit another journal and address why it was not accepted (start over).
6. If it is sent for review, expect to wait about 2-3 months on average before you hear back. If it is summertime or December, add an additional 2-3months.
7. The reviews will likely ask you to do several more experiments to tie up loose ends/prove your assertions. It may also be rejected at this point, meaning you lose this much more time. You typically have 1 month to address the reviwers concerns.
8. Re-submit the paper with every comment addressed. Wait some more time (1-2 months) for the reviewers to re-read your responses. They can then ask for further changes or accept the paper.
9. Once accepted... you still have to wait for the paper to go into press. This can take from 1-6 months, depending on the journal of course.
10. Before your paper is published, you will get galley proofs of your paper. You typically have 24 hrs to make sure your name is spelled right and that the editors didn't mis-interpret anything.
11. Congrats- your paper is accepted! This took you between 3-12 months!
For clinical papers this may be shorter, but this is not guaranteed.
Good luck!