Unethical Behavior of Programs during the interview trail...

Started by Whiteman
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Whiteman

Junior Member
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Can anyone comment any bad experiences they had during the interview or post-interview. I heard that in some places they asked whether a person was single or married. Also, I heard stories that the reason some program went into the scramble is because they didn't rank like 30-40% of the applicants interviewed. Did anyone else have any other shocking experiences 😱

Please comment
 
Whiteman said:
Can anyone comment any bad experiences they had during the interview or post-interview. I heard that in some places they asked whether a person was single or married. Also, I heard stories that the reason some program went into the scramble is because they didn't rank like 30-40% of the applicants interviewed. Did anyone else have any other shocking experiences 😱

Please comment
Well I don't know about this not ranking 30-40% of interviewees comment. I think it would be *a lot less likely* to find high quality PM&R applicants through the scramble. Different programs interview different numbers of applicants and each program knows how many applicants it generally has to rank to fill. I recall hearing the RIC interviewed about 200 this year. They have 12 spots. I believe Mayo said they interviewed about 45, rank them all, and go to about 20 on their list. I think they have 6 or 8 spots.
 
Yep. I had some illegal questions on the interview trail including, but not limited to: are you married, do you have a boyfriend, what's your ethnicity, etc. It's my understanding that interviewers are "not allowed" to ask these questions unless you volunteer the information. Personally, I don't think its a big deal and I wasn't about to respond with, "Excuse me, but that's an illegal question."

As far as ranking, I don't think it's all that uncommon for programs to not rank all their interviewees. This seemed like common practice in medicine during my prelim interviews. One PM&R program even showed us their interviewer evals and one of the options was "Do not rank".