- Joined
- Sep 21, 2006
- Messages
- 1,723
- Reaction score
- 2
FYI,
UNLV ranks all their applicants according to the following formula to get an objective score
Part 1 stats:
(sGpa + cGpa)/8 x (RC DAT)/30 x (BIO ORG QR DAT)/90 x 75= __________
Part 2 is based on interviews:
(interview #1 score 1-5)+(int #2 1-5)/10 x 25=___________
So as you can see the perfect applicant would score 100.
How do you feel about this approach? Obviously if you get invited for an interview, your part 1 score is great. Is it fair?
UNLV ranks all their applicants according to the following formula to get an objective score
Part 1 stats:
(sGpa + cGpa)/8 x (RC DAT)/30 x (BIO ORG QR DAT)/90 x 75= __________
Part 2 is based on interviews:
(interview #1 score 1-5)+(int #2 1-5)/10 x 25=___________
So as you can see the perfect applicant would score 100.
How do you feel about this approach? Obviously if you get invited for an interview, your part 1 score is great. Is it fair?