Perkinjeboy
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2018
- Messages
- 61
- Reaction score
- 89
Are post-interview update letters / letters of interest necessary? I am specifically talking about PRE decision (acceptance/rejection/waitlist).
There is a small subset of med schools that actively encourage frequent updates. For all others, pre-decision update letters are not required. That is not to say, however, that such letters might not affect decision-making, where a decision might be on a cusp. While some schools discourage them, and others ignore them, there are those remaining that take them into account. The problem is, you don't always know which schools lie in the latter category.Are post-interview update letters / letters of interest necessary? I am specifically talking about PRE decision (acceptance/rejection/waitlist).
Read this:Are post-interview update letters / letters of interest necessary? I am specifically talking about PRE decision (acceptance/rejection/waitlist).
Read this:
How would you interpret a nonbinding promise from a desperate applicant?
Here’s one Adcom member’s thoughts on the matter:
“We only invite amazing students to interview. It is quite unlikely that further good deeds or achievements will have an effect since only the students who have already wowed us are interviewed.”
“One serious thought for a moment. You want to become a physician, a profession that highly values ethical behavior. Yet even before you start training for this profession, you want take the unethical act of making promises to two different schools that you will attend over any other school?” -gonnif
From the wise Med Ed: [What med schools…] accept and desire are two different things. My institution, for instance, will accept practically anything a given applicant wants to forward along, but only rarely do we consider it a worthwhile addition to the package.
And yes, some of us have gotten a little jaded about LOI's. I could fill a barrel with all the post-interview correspondence I have received that has not translated into a single matriculant. This has all gotten mighty complicated and burdensome for what is essentially a zero sum game.
It's generally not burdensome for an applicant to upload something to the portal, and once in a great while it does tip us off with some useful info. I can think of one individual who had a stellar application, like Harvard/Yale/Stanford-worthy, and a superb interview, who sent us several updates and a LOI. We were somewhat perplexed by this person's tenacious interest in our program. Turns out there were family/geographical reasons behind the whole thing, the applicant just never felt comfortable directly playing that card.
When it comes down to waitlist time I will scan through what folks have uploaded post-interview. The vast majority of times it has no impact. Occasionally I have seen it hurt people's chances. Come to think of it, in my experience this is probably more likely, than such correspondence having a positive impact.
See the following for classic examples of why most Admissions deans treat these as lies.
https://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/loi-and-interviews.1252832/#post-18849958
I told a school I'd go if accepted, now not so sure
And if you still don’t believe me, read these:
HomeSkool's Guide to Letters of Intent
Second letter of intent? Help!
Nope. They'll be as useful as any guy saying to a hot chick "I'll still respect you in the morning!" That's because words are easy, doing is harder.Do you think there is more of a place for letters of interest after the rule changes? I was thinking of using them if I get waitlisted at a couple schools high on my list.
There is a small subset of med schools that actively encourage frequent updates. For all others, pre-decision update letters are not required. That is not to say, however, that such letters might not affect decision-making, where a decision might be on a cusp. While some schools discourage them, and others ignore them, there are those remaining that take them into account. The problem is, you don't always know which schools lie in the latter category.
Are a semester's worth of grades worth updating schools for (assuming the grades are good, of course)?
I think so! What classes?
Yup. One of the few good reasons for updates.Are a semester's worth of grades worth updating schools for (assuming the grades are good, of course)?
Are a semester's worth of grades worth updating schools for (assuming the grades are good, of course)?
I agree with @Goro . This would also be the time to add significant activity updates.Yup. One of the few good reasons for updates.
Yes. A show of continued excellence is always good.If one already has straight A's would it even be worth updating on previous semester grades?
I will add one other type that is rarely used any more, the Reconsideration Letter: This is an applicant rejected pre-interview who has a large anomaly in their academic background that can be viewed through mitigating circumstances and asks to be reconsidered. With the non-screened/minimally pre-screened secondaries, there are plenty of opportunities for an applicant to express these circumstances.
I think for most schools, you can just tell them your grades in writing. They get your official transcript by matriculation anyways so they can just check thenI finally graduated... dumb question but can I update schools with an unofficial transcript or should I purchase an official transcript?