Can anyone tell me anything about UPMC's anesthesia residency program? I heard it was "malignant" but the person who said that did not elaborate. Anyone else hear anything similar?
Can anyone tell me anything about UPMC's anesthesia residency program? I heard it was "malignant" but the person who said that did not elaborate. Anyone else hear anything similar?
Can anyone tell me anything about UPMC's anesthesia residency program? I heard it was "malignant" but the person who said that did not elaborate. Anyone else hear anything similar?
Graduating from residency at UPMC as well, I let out a little chuckle when I read the OP's post. UPMC was probably one of the most non-malignant programs out there. Wide variety of cases, plenty of time for reading, decent didactics, residents get good fellowship positions.
And Pittsburgh is underrated as a place to live, especially if you like to eat. The foodie scene has been on the rise for a few years....👍
UPMC goes toe to toe with any program in the country.
No significant weaknesses, and you can tailor your training to meet whatever niche (+/-) fellowship you would like.
Pittsburgh is a great city, with a great cost of living, and most residents can easily buy a home in a good school district if they choose to do so.
One would really be missing out if they did not take a strong look.
IMHO, if UPMC were in Northern Cali, or had a "pedigree" it would be extremely difficult to land a spot.
But to answer the initial question, it might be one of the most resident friendly programs out there.
Sorry I'm late to this party.
I graduated with sethco, and one year behind LushMD. I echo their thoughts. I spent A LOT of time at the recruitment dinners last year, and was a huge cheerleader for the program. I actually thought the program was too soft if anything (overnight call is 3p-7a, and if it's not an "educational case", you can sleep while CRNA sits in the room, broken out 2-3x/wk EVERY WEEK for lectures, etc) never in my mind did I think it was malignant. Most importantly, the Program Director & Associate Director are very interested in resident education, and guide the program accordingly.
I think you're making a poor choice if you skip applying to Pittsburgh based on a single, random comment.
UPMC goes toe to toe with any program in the country.
Point being, there are only a handful of programs that have very few, if any real weaknesses, and consistently produce well trained anesthesiologists who could walk into private practice or academia.
I don't know about that. I could probably name 30-50 programs that fit such criteria.
50 programs? so basically half the programs that exist have no weaknesses? Seems unlikely haha.
Thanks for not actually reading anything and jumping in with a half-cocked reply.
I said 30-50 programs have few weaknesses and regularly produce residents that can walk straight into private practice or academia. Do you disagree?
Geographically and off the top of my head...
Maine
BWH
MGH
Columbia
Penn
Penn State
Pitt
Hopkins
UVA
UNC
Duke
MUSC
Emory
Florida
Miami
UAB
Baylor
UTSW
Vandy
Michigan
Northwestern
Wisconsin
Iowa
Washington
UCSF
Stanford
UCLA
That's just about 60 seconds off the top of my head and 27 names. I'm sure I could think of another 10+ that slipped my mind if you'd like.
Do you disagree in any way?
Yes, actually I did read. He said programs with very few weaknesses; having interviewed at a bunch of programs on your list in the last couple of years, there are a bunch on that list that have significant weaknesses in various areas. Some of them barely have residents meeting minimum case requirements. Agree or disagree, that is my impression. UPMC was an extremely well rounded program. Thats all.
When I interviewed at St Lukes the program director said Pitt had about 10-12 regional fellows, so good luck actually doing a block solo. I know all the cheerleaders post on here, but one of my friends matched there, he likes the cost of living in the city but says the program is only so-so. Complains about not having much exposure/responsibility due to the academia, too many fellows and large class size/no attending knows you. My take when I interviewed at Penn and UPMC was that PA programs are overrated. Take this with a grain of salt though, as all opinion should be
I interviewed at UPMC but ended up at one of the other Pittsburgh programs. From what I heard and saw regarding their residency, it truly is one of the most resident friendly programs in the country. In fact, I have several friends from there who had a step DOWN in quality of life after starting a real job!
Regarding the city if Pittsburgh, I can say that it was pretty awful. The weather is really lousy (most cloudy days in the country), traffic sucks due to all of rivers/tunnels/bridges, people are NOT friendly, dirty city, the steelers suck, etc. And housing is cheap because nothing has been built since 1960 or earlier. Expect to pay at LEAST 3% property taxes and you get to pay 3% of your income to the corrupt city government. Did I mention that the Steelers suck?
That said, UPMC seems like a good enough program to put up with all that is ****sburg.
Voted.... By who exactly? If you found it in an internet article then it MUST be true!And yet the City gets voted, year after year, as the most livable city in the Country....thank your for your opinion though.