- Joined
- Dec 31, 2007
- Messages
- 1,373
- Reaction score
- 25
They should have used an MRI. That would have solved the problem of removing the round
PS: Seriously people, it's just a bullet. Jeez. They treated it like it was a bomb.
PPS: How would a round get into someone's head with the shell anyway?
They should have used an MRI. That would have solved the problem of removing the round
PS: Seriously people, it's just a bullet. Jeez. They treated it like it was a bomb.
PPS: How would a round get into someone's head with the shell anyway?
I'm just astounded to hear they even train for that sort of stuff
Um, it was a bomb. Explosive round.
They said, the way these things are set up, this type of round has an impact detonator on the front of the charge, Dr. Bini said. They just said, Dont drop it.
the NYT article is much better at explaining it. Its not a question of the round "going off" and ricocheting, its an explosive round, like... go boom.
Edit: I hope the "live" vs "alive" post above was a poor attempt at sad cheesy humor.
It was a 14.5 mm highly explosive round. Here's another angle:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/10/world/asia/10military.html?hpw
Its like something out of a TV medical drama (I believe it was grey's). Luckily the surgeon who took it out had simulated training on how to not drop live rounds. I'd imagine it would have been more freaky for the bomb tech to carry it out the room and dismantle it...