- Joined
- Jan 1, 2014
- Messages
- 857
- Reaction score
- 646
In the light of medical school, do ADCOMs look differently upon a student's publication depending on what level the research is? I have worked with a PGY-2 family med resident over the past year on a clinical trial dealing with CVD interventions. I will be listed as co-author when the study is published later this year in American Family Physician.
Personally, I am very proud of this research because of the nuances I contributed to the study but will ADCOMS have mixed feelings about this experience because it is not bench research?
I am currently a sophomore and AM looking to get involved with cell biology research this semester, along with a summer research program, so hopefully I can make a meaningful impact with this kind of research before I apply in 2015.
I am shooting for top 25 schools when I apply. What do y'all think about the significance of publishing and conducting research with clinical vs. bench? I feel like a co-author on either project would portray the same accomplishments: original research, testing hypotheses... the only difference I can think of would be that I haven't conducted lab experiments..
Personally, I am very proud of this research because of the nuances I contributed to the study but will ADCOMS have mixed feelings about this experience because it is not bench research?
I am currently a sophomore and AM looking to get involved with cell biology research this semester, along with a summer research program, so hopefully I can make a meaningful impact with this kind of research before I apply in 2015.
I am shooting for top 25 schools when I apply. What do y'all think about the significance of publishing and conducting research with clinical vs. bench? I feel like a co-author on either project would portray the same accomplishments: original research, testing hypotheses... the only difference I can think of would be that I haven't conducted lab experiments..