- Joined
- Sep 5, 2006
- Messages
- 1,696
- Reaction score
- 9
Oops. I got the magazine, year, AND data wrong haha. It's been a while so I must have gotten my stats mixed up with something else, except I got Harvard right for some reason. Anyway, the article is here, published sometime in 2003:
http://www.mc.vanderbilt.edu/vumcpub/index.html?pubID=10&articleID=202
Vandy competes the best with WUSTL and Baylor, but only gets 4 of 23 with Hopkins and 4 of 33 with Duke. Like I said before, 1 out of 9 for Harvard too. Since this was 4 years ago, these stats are probably different now because it looks like scholarship funds have gone up. Sorry for the confusion ...I read the last 3 years of the Reporter when I was trying to make my decision, as I wanted to get the "real" info about the school and not the glamorized version that every Second Look has. That's probably why I jumbled everything up in my mind.
Spatula, what year did you graduate from Duke? I'm a senior right now. I had the same complaints (and praises) as you when I was considering Duke. I felt I'd do better in a curriculum like Vandy's and I didn't want to stay in Durham another 4 years, so I basically removed Duke from my list pretty easily (I think rankings can only tell you so much, especially when USNEWS' methodology is suspicious, so it didn't matter to me that Duke was top 10 and vandy was top 20--not really all that big of a difference to start out with anyway. What's good about both schools though is that they aren't stagnant--they're continuously growing and getting better, making sure to take an active stance to improve themselves. Just look at how much their NIH funding has gone up in the past decade and how many new facilities they have. Having seen the same thing on Duke's undergrad campus, there's a certain amount of positive energy that results throughout campus when you see the administration taking an active stance against deficiencies. It makes the future and present a lot more exciting and the climate a lot more supportive.).
Honestly, since USNEWS has a monopoly on the public's idea of "rankings" (and if they keep the same methodology)... school's like duke will be ranked even higher in the future just because they have room to grow (make more buildings, etc). School's like Columbia that are stuck in a big city likely won't be able to attract more net NIH funding b/c they don't have space to make more labs, etc.
I graudated last year from Duke.... I really don't want to stay in Durham. It'll be hard to turn down Duke since its Duke... but sheez, if Vandy dropped me some dough that would be so much easier.