- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 303
- Reaction score
- 41
Not quite grasping this. Why does "positive" ventilation pressure lead to hypotension? Per my instructor (and book) the positive pressure of ventilation leads to compression of the vena cava. I'm cool with the idea of increased thoracic pressure and vena cava compression (assuming that is what they are getting at), but how does that differ from a normal, deep, inspiration on a non-ventilated person (negative pressure)?
It seems to me that it is all about thoracic volume. Less thoracic volume (from expanded lungs - either by ventilation or normal inspiration) increases thoracic pressure. I don't see the relevance of whether the lungs expand via negative pressure (normal inspiration) or positive pressure (mechanical ventilation).
The example I would give is a balloon with a tube to the atmosphere inside a sealed glass box. Whether that balloon is pumped with air (positive pressure) or filled with air via vacuum (negative pressure), it has the same effect on the partial pressure of gas inside the box. How the balloon increases its volume (via negative or positive pressure) is irrelevant. How am I wrong here?
It seems to me that it is all about thoracic volume. Less thoracic volume (from expanded lungs - either by ventilation or normal inspiration) increases thoracic pressure. I don't see the relevance of whether the lungs expand via negative pressure (normal inspiration) or positive pressure (mechanical ventilation).
The example I would give is a balloon with a tube to the atmosphere inside a sealed glass box. Whether that balloon is pumped with air (positive pressure) or filled with air via vacuum (negative pressure), it has the same effect on the partial pressure of gas inside the box. How the balloon increases its volume (via negative or positive pressure) is irrelevant. How am I wrong here?