- Joined
- Jan 23, 2013
- Messages
- 1,608
- Reaction score
- 501
I don't disagree with your main points, but a couple of thoughts:
1) My understanding is that LizzyM is an ADCOM at a highly ranked, research-focused medical school on the East Coast. Her opinion matters, but it can hardly be extrapolated to every medical school in the country. What impresses a random, physician ADCOM member at the University of Oklahoma School of Medicine might not impress a non-physician ADCOM member at Yale, Harvard, or Johns Hopkins. That's the nature of every aspect of the application, and this one is no different.
2) If schools really feel this way about mission trips and global health, they should stop being such damn hypocrites. Every school I applied to this year has the opportunity to do international electives and at least half of them have some variation of a "global health track." These are certainly different from an alternative spring break trip to Peru, which I agree is almost always a waste of money and resources, but these schools also recognize that the vast majority of students who participate in international electives will not continue doing meaningful global health work during residency or beyond. Residency schedules, loan payments, and personal obligations make doing so extremely difficult and unlikely for all but the most passionate and dedicated. Yet schools still offer these opportunities and publish breathless press releases on the SoM website, complete with pictures of MS-4s flanked by a group of grinning dark-skinned children. Schools use these opportunities as recruiting tools, often giving them more space on their admissions websites than domestic research opportunities. My point is that if medical schools actually think short-term international health work is useless, disingenuous, or unimportant, then it should not be advertised as part of the medical school curriculum.
On the contrary, I think most people agree that global health work, when done right, is extremely beneficial to the host community. Learning about health disparities and how to practice in international healthcare environments should be part of the medical school curriculum for those who are interested, but that does not automatically mean that it should be excluded from the pre-medical curriculum.
1) My understanding is that LizzyM is an ADCOM at a highly ranked, research-focused medical school on the East Coast. Her opinion matters, but it can hardly be extrapolated to every medical school in the country. What impresses a random, physician ADCOM member at the University of Oklahoma School of Medicine might not impress a non-physician ADCOM member at Yale, Harvard, or Johns Hopkins. That's the nature of every aspect of the application, and this one is no different.
2) If schools really feel this way about mission trips and global health, they should stop being such damn hypocrites. Every school I applied to this year has the opportunity to do international electives and at least half of them have some variation of a "global health track." These are certainly different from an alternative spring break trip to Peru, which I agree is almost always a waste of money and resources, but these schools also recognize that the vast majority of students who participate in international electives will not continue doing meaningful global health work during residency or beyond. Residency schedules, loan payments, and personal obligations make doing so extremely difficult and unlikely for all but the most passionate and dedicated. Yet schools still offer these opportunities and publish breathless press releases on the SoM website, complete with pictures of MS-4s flanked by a group of grinning dark-skinned children. Schools use these opportunities as recruiting tools, often giving them more space on their admissions websites than domestic research opportunities. My point is that if medical schools actually think short-term international health work is useless, disingenuous, or unimportant, then it should not be advertised as part of the medical school curriculum.
On the contrary, I think most people agree that global health work, when done right, is extremely beneficial to the host community. Learning about health disparities and how to practice in international healthcare environments should be part of the medical school curriculum for those who are interested, but that does not automatically mean that it should be excluded from the pre-medical curriculum.
Last edited: