We must stop arguing over nothing.

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
OK, one more thing and then I will leave you alone, I promise. But your research is legit, so maybe you can answer this for me (my PI was really confused by my question, and didn't have a real answer -- it could also be because this is a stupid question):

Isn't it weird that the accumulation of so many random mutations results in the same step-wise trajectory of benign-to-malignant (i.e. proliferation -> vascularization -> ability to chew up the EC matrix -> no need to adhere for survival)?

I mean, what are the odds... it's like rolling hundreds of dice hundreds of times, counting the dots each time, and still every time ending up with the same cumulative number. And then having that number equal a metastasis.

(I'm drooling)

You may be gone, or not, but maybe you will read this....

It isn't weird because it doesn't work exactly as you state. Yes, in every instance where it works that way, it works that way. However, you are discounting all of the times when the trajectory flows another way. So many random mutations result in benign tumors that never attract attention, or that are cleared / corrected by the immune system, or that fail to vascularize adequately and fizzle out, or.. or.. or.. Everyone is always having neoplastic events. The ones that develop into cancer are the outliers.

Using your analogy above, of rolling dice... if you roll a pair of dice 100 times and add up the numbers, probability suggests that you are going to have a number between 600-800. Sometimes the dice rolled 6s and 7s, sometimes a mutation like 2 or 12 popped up, but probability averaged those out. Let's call that normal. If you repeat that experiment 100 times, almost all of the time, the numbers will be in the normal range. Sometimes, they might be between 400-600 or between 800-1000. Those represent low grade neoplasms, that we can easily treat, if they don't spontaneously resolve.

If you keep rolling the dice, sooner or later, you will have a set that comes up between 200-400 or 1000-1200. Let that represent the malignant changes you describe above. It is rare, and it took a lot of aberrant events to develop. But every time it happens, it is because that is how the dice rolls happened to work out. Those are the ones that you notice, that get attention. An emergent order from randomness triggers your pattern matching brain to focus in, and confirmation bias is born.

You flounced out decrying the quality of the conversation here... but I suggest that hold yourself responsible for the quality of the conversations that you start and participate in. If you want the great minds of SDN to join you in intellectual stimulation, you gotta carry your share. You asked an interesting question and got a thorough and thoughtful answer.... in a thread that you started by poking a stick at the way other people choose to use the forum. I am trying to impart to you that SDN, like medical school, and every other thing in your life, is exactly no more or less than what you make of it. Please think on that. If you run around trying to find everything where you want it to be, you will be looking for a long time. Try focusing more on how you can make what you are seeking, right where you are, in each moment. You will have a much more successful and fulfilling experience of life.

Also, there is a great book you should read. You Are Not So Smart. Don't be offended by the title, please. It isn't a passive aggressive insult... it is a book that helps you think about thinking and about the unexamined cognitive biases that get in everyone's way: Amazon product ASIN 1592406599
And thanks to you, I just learned about the sequel: You Are Now Less Dumb. I will go buy it now.
 
However, you are discounting all of the times when the trajectory flows another way.

I cannot tell you how much I appreciate your honest reply to this, because this thought is something that perplexed me for some time... You make EXCELLENT points. The PI I did research with would love you.
 
Here's a GOOD ONE: what's with the correlation between omega-6 intake and homicidal behavior? lolz seriously though.
 
What about the gaming console vs. PC master race debate? I haven't seen much on that.

used to be a PC guy but then realized its way more cost effective to just buy a console for like $350 bucks that lasts you 5+ years. It's like 1/4 the cost for 98 % of the experience.
 
Wait, in regards to the OP: Getting accepted to medical school = "genius level intellect"?

That's hilarious.
 
What about the gaming console vs. PC master race debate? I haven't seen much on that.

I had an XBox 360 that I liked before it got stolen when my apartment got burglarized. Haven't felt the need to get another console since. I've got a 3DS that I play on every once and a while, but I otherwise play on a computer or not at all.
 
used to be a PC guy but then realized its way more cost effective to just buy a console for like $350 bucks that lasts you 5+ years. It's like 1/4 the cost for 98 % of the experience.
I hope you're being sarcastic.
 
tp_diag01.gif

Discuss.

See, I think it's all about roll height. If the roll is lower than waist level, I prefer the paper facing away. If it's higher than waist level, I prefer the paper over. Why? Because it's easier to tear toilet paper when you can get a good vector on it. If you're pulling it from the same spot that it's unrolling (as in, the "over," or paper facing you) but it is lower than where you are pulling from, you just end up spinning the roll and pulling way too much because you're pulling directly at it's point of origin. Without a shear force, you've got no tearing happening, and your bathroom ends up looking like this:
hqdefault.jpg
=^-.-^=
 
I hope you're being sarcastic.

no. I look at PC gaming as like the pinnacle of gaming, however it just takes too much effort/money/time

console gaming is a great compromise
 
What about the gaming console vs. PC master race debate? I haven't seen much on that.

Because it isn't a debate.

PC MASTER RACE

photo.jpg


Also, to OP (to remain on topic) - YOU'RE the one who created the last thread (which you now call stupid)! I don't get it lol. SDN is rarely the place to discuss such highbrow matters; instead, we discuss all the stuff under the surface that may be questionable or, god-forbid, "unprofessional" to discuss out in public.

Make a separate thread about the oncogene/research stuff if you really want. In a different forum though. This one is for medical students. You might get some replies but it's not going to be a super robust thread. Sitting on your high horse and telling us off for blowing off steam on the internet isn't going to help your case.
 
Last edited:
Because it isn't a debate.

PC MASTER RACE

photo.jpg


Also, to OP (to remain on topic) - YOU'RE the one who created the last thread (which you now call stupid)! I don't get it lol. SDN is rarely the place to discuss such highbrow matters; instead, we discuss all the stuff under the surface that may be questionable or, god-forbid, "unprofessional" to discuss out in public.

Make a separate thread about the oncogene/research stuff if you really want. In a different forum though. This one is for medical students. You might get some replies but it's not going to be a super robust thread. Sitting on your high horse and telling us off for blowing off steam on the internet isn't going to help your case.
I thought console peasants were filthy, not dirty. Now I'm confused.
 
I thought console peasants were filthy, not dirty. Now I'm confused.

First place I saw this was on Zero Punctuation (unsure if it's truly the first use of the term), and that is what I will refer back to for my future powerpoint presentations about PC Master Race.
 
First place I saw this was on Zero Punctuation (unsure if it's truly the first use of the term), and that is what I will refer back to for my future powerpoint presentations about PC Master Race.
I started watching freshman year of college
Sooo funny
 
Top