Weaker Programs

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

mickey1t

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
85
Reaction score
10
Hey, long time reader, first time poster....im not the strongest candidate, 210 on both STEP 1 and 2 and Passes on all my clinical rotations. I was curious if we could compiled a list of weaker programs, IMG friendly programs for us "normal" people to apply to....

Thanks
 
just apply to a bunch of programs. 210 isn't bad. You'll be fine. You'll get a spot somewhere. Just be a good person with a good attitude and you'll find a program that wants you. apply to at least 30 programs, maybe 40. work your contacts from your home program. you'll be fine.
 
Hey, long time reader, first time poster....im not the strongest candidate, 210 on both STEP 1 and 2 and Passes on all my clinical rotations. I was curious if we could compiled a list of weaker programs, IMG friendly programs for us "normal" people to apply to....

Thanks

Following programs are per reputation from friends who are there/interviewed with low low scores:

NY progs outside of Roch, Columbia, NYU, Cornell, Mt Sinai. NJ progs. WVU. MCG. SLU. Case Western/Metro. MCV. Maine Medical Center. UK Witchita. I'm sure people can add more.
 
Surfer...I dont think am a bad applicant, i have great letters and an MBA, but i just want to increase my total number of interviews, increasing my chances of matching.

Coastie...thanks, this is exactly what i was looking for...hoepfully other members can help and add to the list
 
Suffice it to say that there are about 25 programs that are uber competitive.

There are about 25 programs that you absolutely do not want to go to.

The other 82 are a coin toss.

No need to name names. Part of becoming an excellent detective, which is a large part of what medical training serves to accomplish, is figuring out who's who.

-copro
 
You also might want to apply to Beaumont Hospital's program in Michigan. It's brand-spanking new. They may be a little more... ahem... "flexible" as to who they accept their first year, and may prove to be a great program that gets more competitive as time goes on. But, as new kid on the block, they are an unknown entity.

-copro
 
copro, thanks for the insight....do any of the programs listed above fall under the "malignant" program category?
 
copro, thanks for the insight....do any of the programs listed above fall under the "malignant" program category?

All residency programs are "malignant". 🙁

-copro
 
You also might want to apply to Beaumont Hospital's program in Michigan. It's brand-spanking new. They may be a little more... ahem... "flexible" as to who they accept their first year, and may prove to be a great program that gets more competitive as time goes on. But, as new kid on the block, they are an unknown entity.

-copro

So it looks like Beaumont has had a long-standing fairly well-ranked CRNA training program (since 1991), how does a hospital manage having CRNA students and anesthesiology residents at the same time? Are there struggles for cases or are these things pretty well parceled out?
 
So it looks like Beaumont has had a long-standing fairly well-ranked CRNA training program (since 1991), how does a hospital manage having CRNA students and anesthesiology residents at the same time? Are there struggles for cases or are these things pretty well parceled out?

I have no clue.

I finished my training. We had CRNAs. We occasionally fought for good cases. A lot of people complained. Nothing was done about it. I still had more than ample numbers at the end of residency, though, and took care of tons of sick patients. And, so far, the feedback I've gotten from my PP colleagues is that I was very well-trained.

-copro
 
So it looks like Beaumont has had a long-standing fairly well-ranked CRNA training program (since 1991), how does a hospital manage having CRNA students and anesthesiology residents at the same time? Are there struggles for cases or are these things pretty well parceled out?

Wayne State has both CRNA and Anesthesiology training programs. Generally, things work out quite well from what I understand. Hearts are down at Wayne State, so they do have to fight for heart cases, though like Copro stated, they still easily get their numbers.

My thoughts are that it'll be a bit of a rough road going into Beaumont right off the bat, but I'm not going to let that stop me necessarily. They have huge surgical volumes and I wouldn't be as worried about finding enough cases as I would of the perhaps not so nice relationships between the MD/DO's and CRNAs..(from what I've heard)

cf
 
Wayne State has both CRNA and Anesthesiology training programs. Generally, things work out quite well from what I understand. Hearts are down at Wayne State, so they do have to fight for heart cases, though like Copro stated, they still easily get their numbers.

My thoughts are that it'll be a bit of a rough road going into Beaumont right off the bat, but I'm not going to let that stop me necessarily. They have huge surgical volumes and I wouldn't be as worried about finding enough cases as I would of the perhaps not so nice relationships between the MD/DO's and CRNAs..(from what I've heard)

cf


Fight for cases?

No resident should have to fight CRNAs for any case.

Don't let the CRNAs do hearts..let the residents do them. If I was a potential resident, I'd never go to a place where I have to "fight" CRNAs for cases. Give me a break...
 
If I was a potential resident, I'd never go to a place where I have to "fight" CRNAs for cases. Give me a break...

That's the way it goes, my friend. Even with a boatload of residents, there were still some cases that CRNAs got - the senior, seasoned ones - who, in all honesty, were more "trusted" than some of the residents.

That, and the politics of keeping them "happy" so they'd stick around and not go somewhere else to work.

You have to realize that there is such a tremendous shortage of resources out there still, and this will be that way for at least a few more years. There still just isn't enough people to do all the work. While this situation persists, CRNAs will exist at teaching hospitals with residents... and will occasionally get thrown a bone or two.

-copro
 
If your program gives up cases you want and need to student nurses, then your program sucks.
If CRNAs do some good cases for staffing and hours issues then fine, but there should be no question about who gets dibs on the good cases in the morning.
 
If your program gives up cases you want and need to student nurses, then your program sucks.
If CRNAs do some good cases for staffing and hours issues then fine, but there should be no question about who gets dibs on the good cases in the morning.

I wish it had been that straightforward. 🙁

-copro
 
If your program gives up cases you want and need to student nurses, then your program sucks.
If CRNAs do some good cases for staffing and hours issues then fine, but there should be no question about who gets dibs on the good cases in the morning.

Agreed. This is a HUGE red flag that interviewees should look out for. This is wrong on SO MANY different levels. For major teaching hospitals out there who do this, think how many surgery residents see this and think, "anesthesiologists think it's safe for CRNAs to do the biggest cases." This is probably the only exposure the surgery residents will have to the practice of anesthesiology until they're in the community. At some point, some of these surgeons are going to be on hospital committes, with major input on hiring models.

Hopefully the anesthesia attendings at these programs are making frequent visits to these ORs, so the surgeons know who's making the decisions.
 
Agreed. This is a HUGE red flag that interviewees should look out for. This is wrong on SO MANY different levels. For major teaching hospitals out there who do this, think how many surgery residents see this and think, "anesthesiologists think it's safe for CRNAs to do the biggest cases." This is probably the only exposure the surgery residents will have to the practice of anesthesiology until they're in the community. At some point, some of these surgeons are going to be on hospital committes, with major input on hiring models.

Hopefully the anesthesia attendings at these programs are making frequent visits to these ORs, so the surgeons know who's making the decisions.

Interesting perspective.

I was having a discussion recently with one of our vascular surgeons about this very subject. His take is a little different than yours.

He's 100% on the side of having an Anesthesiologist - all the time and exclusively - doing his cases. And, he always gets one.

Here's why...

He's been practicing for roughly 25 years, and tells me he's seen it all. He told me about a case about 15 years ago (or so) that convinced him only to have an anesthesiologist.

He was doing an awake carotid endarterectomy on a patient. The patient had been blocked, touched-up, and fully localized during the case. Everything went smoothly, as do the vast majority of his cases, until the very end of the case. He'd thrown the last couple of sutures in, and broke scrub. They moved the stretcher into the room and were getting ready to move the patient over to the bed when the patient suddenly couldn't move the entire right side of his body. The surgeon asked the patient if he felt okay. Aphasic.

He looked at the nurse anesthetist and said, "Put him to sleep. NOW! I've gotta go back in."

The nurse anesthetist got (according to him) a panicked, deer-in-the-headlights look and said back to him, "Ummm... we don't normally do this for these cases. I'm not sure that I should put him to sleep. Hang on a second."

The surgeon said, "Look, I don't care what you normally do. I'm not asking you for your opinion. This guy's brain is in trouble. I'm going to re-scrub, put the patient to sleep now. Put him on 100% oxygen. Paralyze him. Get everything else ready."

Again, the nurse anesthetist says back to him, "Hang on a second." She then goes to the back of the room, picks up the phone, and starts to call someone.

Well, as you can imagine, this is when he goes completely ballistic. He walks over and - as he tells me - literally rips the phone out of the wall and throws it on the ground.

"GET OFF THE F**KING PHONE AND PUT THE F**KING PATIENT TO SLEEP RIGHT NOW OR YOU'RE NEVER WORKING IN THIS HOSPITAL AGAIN!"

About that time, the circulator put out an "Anesthesia STAT to OR 'X'" on the overhead. An anesthesiologist shows up, and within about 2 minutes from his arrival the patient is asleep, intubated, and on the ventilator.

Now, as you can probably imagine, this surgeon got into deep doo-doo for the outburst. But, everyone in the room got the message. And, he tells me, he's never since worked with a CRNA. No one will even dare to schedule one in his room.

So, Pooh & Annie, I agree that we are conditioned to believe what is normal and acceptable by our own observations and empirical experiences. But, ultimately, I guess it all depends on who you ask.

(And, yes, boys-and-girls, that is a 100% true story told to me by a 57-year-old vascular surgeon who's seen everything under the sun. You just can't make this stuff up.)

-copro
 
Last edited:
Just so it's clear... we could (I suppose) debate the management of this case ex-post facto... the block was adequate to re-open... maybe... the patient may have showered emboli and was having a stroke that re-opening couldn't fix... maybe... intubating and paralyzing the patient would remove the ability to monitor the progress of the surgery, which is why you do an awake CEA anyway...

That's not the point. The point, at least to this surgeon, was that he needed to go "off the script". And, he needed to do it urgently. His likely clinical suspicion was vasospasm and/or some kind of clot in the artery (graft had torn loose, etc.).

There was no room for debate or clarification or "not knowing what to do". Time = brain cells. Nothing else but immediate exploration, and possible clot removal or papavarine (etc.), was going to help at that point. Stick a tube in. Get them on 100%. Open up. Take a look. Wake up later and assess neuro and do scans or whatever else later.

At that point, you don't pick up the phone and ask for clarification. You act quickly and decisively to facilitate the surgical needs of the patient.

This incident (among the additive effect of others, I'm sure) was the straw that finally broke this camel's back for this particular surgeon.

Bottom line, you'll never be able to quantify such occurrences in a "Silber" or "Pine" type study. When the **** hits the fan, the training and knowledge of what the implications of inaction or incorrect action can do clearly makes a difference.

-copro
 
Suffice it to say that there are about 25 programs that are uber competitive.

There are about 25 programs that you absolutely do not want to go to.

The other 82 are a coin toss.

No need to name names. Part of becoming an excellent detective, which is a large part of what medical training serves to accomplish, is figuring out who's who.

-copro

Care to share with a little more detail on how to do research on these programs? It seems fairly straight forward with medicine and surgery, but I'm having a hard time choosing where and where not to apply for 2010 match (in anesthesia). Websites like scutwork seem to be very polarizing (not just for anesthesia but for all fields).
 
vök;8708809 said:
Care to share with a little more detail on how to do research on these programs? It seems fairly straight forward with medicine and surgery, but I'm having a hard time choosing where and where not to apply for 2010 match (in anesthesia). Websites like scutwork seem to be very polarizing (not just for anesthesia but for all fields).

Get the list from frieda. Knock out areas of the country you're not living in. Knock out programs that you know, in your heart of hearts, that you couldn't stand. (The rival sports team, the place your ex went, ect.) Take away the ones that are either too above or too below your level. (And there's really nothing too low, play it safe.) Then research the remaining.

Departmental websites. E-mailing current residents. Talking to friends, or that dude from high school who now lives in that city. Whatever those programs put out there for you to see. But if you do your own legwork, you'll get the info to make your own decision, rather than everyone else's runoff biased knowledge.
 
Get the list from frieda. Knock out areas of the country you're not living in. Knock out programs that you know, in your heart of hearts, that you couldn't stand. (The rival sports team, the place your ex went, ect.) Take away the ones that are either too above or too below your level. (And there's really nothing too low, play it safe.) Then research the remaining.

Departmental websites. E-mailing current residents. Talking to friends, or that dude from high school who now lives in that city. Whatever those programs put out there for you to see. But if you do your own legwork, you'll get the info to make your own decision, rather than everyone else's runoff biased knowledge.

Thanks, that gives me a better idea how to go about things. I wasn't looking for opinions on particular programs, just a push in the right direction on how to start my research 🙂
 
Top