- Joined
- Jul 4, 2005
- Messages
- 43
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello,
Often times I read here that CRNAs are lesser providers than MDAs, and that there are differences in outcome or scope of practice for the two professions. I'll cite some examples so you know what I'm talking about.
I'm a future nursing student with the goal of becoming a CRNA. I won't pretend for a second that I'll ever have the knowledge or training that an MDA has went through, but my question is in a practical sense, does this really matter? What is the benefit of an MDA performing a case rather than a CRNA? I hope my question doesn't provoke any heated responses because this is a genuine question, I really don't understand the difference between the two professions as they seem to both do their jobs equally well.
So again, if someone could educate me about the practical differences between a CRNA and MDA I'd appreciate it.
Thanks
Often times I read here that CRNAs are lesser providers than MDAs, and that there are differences in outcome or scope of practice for the two professions. I'll cite some examples so you know what I'm talking about.
If CEOs and the public feel that CRNAs can do the same job as an anesthesiologist (which is what the AANA does through its publications about similar outcomes by CRNAs and anesthesiologists) then it benefits them to go the 'cheaper' route.
Take for example wikipedia. Look up CRNA...you will see amongst other things a link to "No Significant Differences in Anesthesia Outcome by Provider"...with no debate no discussion, no counterpoint. OK, it's an article about CRNA's probably written by CRNA's....
Then look up "anesthesiology" in wikipedia. The same article, "No Significant Differences in Anesthesia Outcome by Provider" is also cited in the links, under the subheading "patient information". Again, no discussion, no counterpoint, no clarification.
I'm a future nursing student with the goal of becoming a CRNA. I won't pretend for a second that I'll ever have the knowledge or training that an MDA has went through, but my question is in a practical sense, does this really matter? What is the benefit of an MDA performing a case rather than a CRNA? I hope my question doesn't provoke any heated responses because this is a genuine question, I really don't understand the difference between the two professions as they seem to both do their jobs equally well.
So again, if someone could educate me about the practical differences between a CRNA and MDA I'd appreciate it.
Thanks