- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
- Messages
- 207
- Reaction score
- 316
Is an abstract/poster accepted for presentation at a conference worthy of an update during COVID?:
In October, an abstract I wrote was accepted for publication in the SUPPLEMENT to a journal and for a poster presentation at a national conference. The corresponding poster was also presented virtually (no live presentation--it was literally just my poster in a gallery of posters on an online gallery lol). Also, this poster was not super basic-sciency/and in my opinion was not a particularly impressive demonstration of scientific inquiry. All I did was describe my objective wrt addressing a problem, intervention, and the effects of that intervention via surveying patients and reviewing some data.
What should I include in a letter of continued interest?
One school I have interviewed at has explicitly said that they welcome letters of continued interest post-interview. What should I even talk about in a letter like this? Should I include updates like the one mentioned above?
Who should I send letters of continued interest to (if they have not indicated any stance towards LOCI's)?
I interviewed at a school at the end of October, and they didn't really give us a clear answer on when we could expect to hear back. I know they interview a LOT of people (40-50 on my interview day alone), so I don't want to bother them with extra materials that won't help them make a decision. Should I send a letter of continued interest?
There is also one school that has not invited me to interview that I strongly consider as one of my top choices, especially because I have a history and connections to the school, and I feel very convinced that I would enjoy being at that school based on my experiences. Should I be sending them a letter of continued interest? One of my friends who is a current MS1 there actually was rejected pre-II, but was eventually interviewed and accepted after she wrote a short emailing appealing for reconsideration. This makes me think they are more open to correspondence, but there's hardly any transparency about communication standards for most schools during this whole process 🙁.
In October, an abstract I wrote was accepted for publication in the SUPPLEMENT to a journal and for a poster presentation at a national conference. The corresponding poster was also presented virtually (no live presentation--it was literally just my poster in a gallery of posters on an online gallery lol). Also, this poster was not super basic-sciency/and in my opinion was not a particularly impressive demonstration of scientific inquiry. All I did was describe my objective wrt addressing a problem, intervention, and the effects of that intervention via surveying patients and reviewing some data.
What should I include in a letter of continued interest?
One school I have interviewed at has explicitly said that they welcome letters of continued interest post-interview. What should I even talk about in a letter like this? Should I include updates like the one mentioned above?
Who should I send letters of continued interest to (if they have not indicated any stance towards LOCI's)?
I interviewed at a school at the end of October, and they didn't really give us a clear answer on when we could expect to hear back. I know they interview a LOT of people (40-50 on my interview day alone), so I don't want to bother them with extra materials that won't help them make a decision. Should I send a letter of continued interest?
There is also one school that has not invited me to interview that I strongly consider as one of my top choices, especially because I have a history and connections to the school, and I feel very convinced that I would enjoy being at that school based on my experiences. Should I be sending them a letter of continued interest? One of my friends who is a current MS1 there actually was rejected pre-II, but was eventually interviewed and accepted after she wrote a short emailing appealing for reconsideration. This makes me think they are more open to correspondence, but there's hardly any transparency about communication standards for most schools during this whole process 🙁.