Currently, im doing a double major in bio and chem. I have heard soo many stories of people getting into dental school with a Kinesiology degree which is much less extensive than a typical bio degree. What do you guys think?

Currently, im doing a double major in bio and chem. I have heard soo many stories of people getting into dental school with a Kinesiology degree which is much less extensive than a typical bio degree. What do you guys think?
Currently, im doing a double major in bio and chem. I have heard soo many stories of people getting into dental school with a Kinesiology degree which is much less extensive than a typical bio degree. What do you guys think?
Not all Kinesiology degrees are "easy" as you imply. At some Canadian universities it is purely science-based with courses ranging from anatomy, physiology, psychology, human growth and development, biomechanics, musculoskeletal anatomy, functional anatomy, rehab science, cardiac physiology, muscle physiology etc. I could go on and on (of course for people who want to go into the sport and wellness side of it they can take sport psych, coaching, nutrition etc.) I did a Kin degree and feel like I have a solid grasp of human biology and a diverse background of courses taken. I wouldn't say it is less extensive - I have many friends who did Biology or Life Sciences who did not get to take anatomy (w cadavers as Kin did) or took plant bios and ecology... Since as a pre-dent you have to take the intro bio, chem, orgo, physics anyway these are Kin degree ELECTIVES.
Not sure how it is in the states and if it still a physical education/fitness concentration there... but I would not generalize...
Yea, i go to York and you need to take i think about 8 PKINE courses which are basically exercise courses like soccer, basketball, gymnastics, swimming etc.
What do I think?
I think if you feel like you need to justify your intelligence or academic ability by taking "hard" majors and, in turn, debase other applicants based on the virtue of their "easy" majors for your own self-assurance, then good luck in dental school when the "easy majors" all of a sudden start outperforming you.
It's extremely ignorant to think there is any significant correlation between an individual's academic ability and the perceived rigor of their degree; people choose majors for hundreds of reasons, and I pity individuals who waste 4 years on a degree they don't enjoy but choose simply b/c they feel they needed to "impress" some adcoms. Some majors don't need to be "difficult" to effectively communicate practical information. Why make it hard if it doesn't need to be?
As far as Bio/Chem goes in relation to dental school, it'll definitely help you in the basic science courses. But to think you'll do better than someone without that background is simply ignorant. The girl at the top of her class at our state school this year graduated with a public health degree, and was only magna cum laude. My friend who worked her butt off to graduate with a 4.00 in Biology from the same school? She'll be reapplying next cycle.
I really want to know what school you went to. Public health at least where im at is considered "easy" and Kine is considered a "jock major."
I went to a top-20 public university on the East Coast (I don't think we even offer kinesiology). Sure, my Health Science major was pretty easy. But I want to work in public health, so why would I major in anything else? Plus, it opened up my schedule to do a TON of extracurricular, service, and leadership activities. I also made better numerical averages in my science classes (bio, chem, ochem, physics, a&p) than I did in health classes. So while the science classes were definitely more rigorous, making an A was actually slightly more difficult, to me, in my "easy" major.
I also only studied for the DAT for three weeks and scored a higher academic average and total science than anyone I know at my school, despite having a much weaker science background than most. I still secured first-round interviews to every school to which I applied, and admission to Harvard (which I am not attending), among others. Like I said, the former Health Science major at our state dental school is currently first in her class, and she only had a 3.7 or so undergrad GPA.
The point is that the difficulty of one's major isn't a predictor of future success. There will be people at the top of dental classes from "easy" undergrad majors, just like there will be people at the bottom from "difficult" undergrad majors. I think anybody can get a good DAT score if you just study the right prep materials, so I think majoring in a hard science just to help you out for the DAT is a complete waste of 4 years when you could major in something that interests you/is a safe fallback option.
If what you are saying is true, you are not the typical dental school applicant.