- Joined
- Mar 19, 2008
- Messages
- 39
- Reaction score
- 1
Just out of curiousity, how far down your rank list/what position on your rank list did you have to go to on match day?
I cannot vote because you do not have an option for "did not match."
Can anyone give some insight on why they or someone they knew matched at there 4th or greater choice? Were the top schools on your list extremely competitive?
I matched at my 5th spot (out of twelve) a number of years ago. The top spots on my rank list were more competitive, but I don't think that was the main issue.
In hindsight, now having been involved with resident admissions at two locations, it is clear to me why I didn't do as well: I didn't play the game. Yes, you want good scores, good grades, good letters, etc. But you have to, unlike me, understand the politics and the game.
I attended a med school that had no EM residency, and I didn't have great guidance on how it all worked. SLORs are key. If you don't have them, it will be questioned. If you have weird alternative letters, it will be questioned. (I had a psych letter because I did really well on that rotation, and thought it would demonstrate uniqueness; it was probably questioned.)
If you do an away rotation, and don't get a letter, it will be questioned. I did an away at a prestigious academic center, not to get a letter or because I wanted to attend there (wasn't interested geographically), but because I thought it would be good educationally. Unfortunately, I stupidly did not hide these facts. I did end up learning a ton there and loving the rotation, but a got a lukewarm eval because the PD was put off for the reasons above.
You will be judged on your apparent intentions. Obviously you should not lie, but if you demonstrate enthusiasm and a desire to be in academics, you will be more heavily favored (especially at academic heavy programs). Despite most of us going to the community, the residencies are run by academics, and they want people to go into academics.
It's interesting to be involved in discussions about applicants, and then seeing their performance as residents. If there's a correlation between match list rank and resident ability, I think it's weak at best. I think it's incredibly hard to sense how somebody will perform as a resident, but of course we do the best we can to figure that out. I'm reminded a bit by that scene early in Moneyball, when all the scouts are discussing the intangibles about the players, and who will succeed and who won't -- in reality it probably doesn't matter very much.
All that said, I'm very happy about where I went to residency, and felt my training was superb. It's my humble opinion that I excelled despite whatever reservations other programs had with my application. Emergency medicine is awesome, and in the end, I'm simply grateful I matched at all and get to do this job.
I matched at my 5th spot (out of twelve) a number of years ago. The top spots on my rank list were more competitive, but I don't think that was the main issue.
In hindsight, now having been involved with resident admissions at two locations, it is clear to me why I didn't do as well: I didn't play the game. Yes, you want good scores, good grades, good letters, etc. But you have to, unlike me, understand the politics and the game.
I attended a med school that had no EM residency, and I didn't have great guidance on how it all worked. SLORs are key. If you don't have them, it will be questioned. If you have weird alternative letters, it will be questioned. (I had a psych letter because I did really well on that rotation, and thought it would demonstrate uniqueness; it was probably questioned.)
If you do an away rotation, and don't get a letter, it will be questioned. I did an away at a prestigious academic center, not to get a letter or because I wanted to attend there (wasn't interested geographically), but because I thought it would be good educationally. Unfortunately, I stupidly did not hide these facts. I did end up learning a ton there and loving the rotation, but a got a lukewarm eval because the PD was put off for the reasons above.
You will be judged on your apparent intentions. Obviously you should not lie, but if you demonstrate enthusiasm and a desire to be in academics, you will be more heavily favored (especially at academic heavy programs). Despite most of us going to the community, the residencies are run by academics, and they want people to go into academics.
It's interesting to be involved in discussions about applicants, and then seeing their performance as residents. If there's a correlation between match list rank and resident ability, I think it's weak at best. I think it's incredibly hard to sense how somebody will perform as a resident, but of course we do the best we can to figure that out. I'm reminded a bit by that scene early in Moneyball, when all the scouts are discussing the intangibles about the players, and who will succeed and who won't -- in reality it probably doesn't matter very much.
All that said, I'm very happy about where I went to residency, and felt my training was superb. It's my humble opinion that I excelled despite whatever reservations other programs had with my application. Emergency medicine is awesome, and in the end, I'm simply grateful I matched at all and get to do this job.
I matched at my 5th spot (out of twelve) a number of years ago. The top spots on my rank list were more competitive, but I don't think that was the main issue.
In hindsight, now having been involved with resident admissions at two locations, it is clear to me why I didn't do as well: I didn't play the game. Yes, you want good scores, good grades, good letters, etc. But you have to, unlike me, understand the politics and the game.
I attended a med school that had no EM residency, and I didn't have great guidance on how it all worked. SLORs are key. If you don't have them, it will be questioned. If you have weird alternative letters, it will be questioned. (I had a psych letter because I did really well on that rotation, and thought it would demonstrate uniqueness; it was probably questioned.)
If you do an away rotation, and don't get a letter, it will be questioned. I did an away at a prestigious academic center, not to get a letter or because I wanted to attend there (wasn't interested geographically), but because I thought it would be good educationally. Unfortunately, I stupidly did not hide these facts. I did end up learning a ton there and loving the rotation, but a got a lukewarm eval because the PD was put off for the reasons above.
You will be judged on your apparent intentions. Obviously you should not lie, but if you demonstrate enthusiasm and a desire to be in academics, you will be more heavily favored (especially at academic heavy programs). Despite most of us going to the community, the residencies are run by academics, and they want people to go into academics.
It's interesting to be involved in discussions about applicants, and then seeing their performance as residents. If there's a correlation between match list rank and resident ability, I think it's weak at best. I think it's incredibly hard to sense how somebody will perform as a resident, but of course we do the best we can to figure that out. I'm reminded a bit by that scene early in Moneyball, when all the scouts are discussing the intangibles about the players, and who will succeed and who won't -- in reality it probably doesn't matter very much.
All that said, I'm very happy about where I went to residency, and felt my training was superb. It's my humble opinion that I excelled despite whatever reservations other programs had with my application. Emergency medicine is awesome, and in the end, I'm simply grateful I matched at all and get to do this job.
I appreciate the insight, and that was a great scene in Moneyball.
I'd be interested in anything else you've got to say about the process from an insider's perspective...
Bougiecric, one more question. What things are discussed about applicants? What things tend to move someone up or down the list post-interview?
Thanks!
I matched at my 5th spot (out of twelve) a number of years ago. The top spots on my rank list were more competitive, but I don't think that was the main issue.
In hindsight, now having been involved with resident admissions at two locations, it is clear to me why I didn't do as well: I didn't play the game. Yes, you want good scores, good grades, good letters, etc. But you have to, unlike me, understand the politics and the game.
I attended a med school that had no EM residency, and I didn't have great guidance on how it all worked. SLORs are key. If you don't have them, it will be questioned. If you have weird alternative letters, it will be questioned. (I had a psych letter because I did really well on that rotation, and thought it would demonstrate uniqueness; it was probably questioned.)
If you do an away rotation, and don't get a letter, it will be questioned. I did an away at a prestigious academic center, not to get a letter or because I wanted to attend there (wasn't interested geographically), but because I thought it would be good educationally. Unfortunately, I stupidly did not hide these facts. I did end up learning a ton there and loving the rotation, but a got a lukewarm eval because the PD was put off for the reasons above.
You will be judged on your apparent intentions. Obviously you should not lie, but if you demonstrate enthusiasm and a desire to be in academics, you will be more heavily favored (especially at academic heavy programs). Despite most of us going to the community, the residencies are run by academics, and they want people to go into academics.
It's interesting to be involved in discussions about applicants, and then seeing their performance as residents. If there's a correlation between match list rank and resident ability, I think it's weak at best. I think it's incredibly hard to sense how somebody will perform as a resident, but of course we do the best we can to figure that out. I'm reminded a bit by that scene early in Moneyball, when all the scouts are discussing the intangibles about the players, and who will succeed and who won't -- in reality it probably doesn't matter very much.
All that said, I'm very happy about where I went to residency, and felt my training was superb. It's my humble opinion that I excelled despite whatever reservations other programs had with my application. Emergency medicine is awesome, and in the end, I'm simply grateful I matched at all and get to do this job.
I'm not going to give too much info about being on the other side and having participated in interviews and the ranking process that happens after the interview.
What I know is that programs do not like to take risks on an applicant. If there is a red flag or two.... you're pretty much low or out of the rank list.
A red flag would be something similar to:
- Gap years that are unexplained
- Failing a rotation (even if it's not EM)
- NOT getting an SLOR from an EM rotation (big red flag)
Those red flags will negate even a 240-260 board score on Step 1. Be very careful.
Hey Pinipig523
I go to a DO school and rotated at one of my home program's sites for EM. I asked for a SLOR and was told that I would be getting a SLOR from the site coordinator who is an MD. Low and behold, once the letter came in it was not a SLOR. They supposedly never write SLORs. I do have two other EM rotations at programs and got SLORs. Plus have an OB letter that was good. Since one of my EM letters is not a SLOR is that a big red flag, or did you mean if you can get a SLOR and you didn't you are in trouble? Also I told interviewers where I rotated at and they had the letters in their hand during my interviews, but I have not really explained why I don't have a SLOR from my home rotation because I have not been asked (even at your program). Should I send an email out to places explaining that? I don't want to look paranoid, but a big red flag can't be a good thing. Thanks
Usually your rank order has been (pretty much) determined prior to the end of your interview day. I personally do not know how much an email will affect your rank order.
I will say that LOR are not looked at the same as an SLOR. But you should've gotten an SLOR out of every rotation in EM. Lacking one *may* be a minor issue but if you explained it during the interviews, it's likely not a red flag. Maybe it's because you rotated at a DO program and it is not standard for them. You have to take it at face value and assume that DO programs don't all participate in SLOR.
If your LOR was great, I don't think anyone would care if it wasn't in SLOR format. It just won't be as convincing as an SLOR that says "this candidate is in the top 10% of all who rotate here this year".
A red flag would be if you didn't have a LOR at all.
Since one of my EM letters is not a SLOR is that a big red flag, or did you mean if you can get a SLOR and you didn't you are in trouble? Also I told interviewers where I rotated at and they had the letters in their hand during my interviews, but I have not really explained why I don't have a SLOR from my home rotation because I have not been asked (even at your program). Should I send an email out to places explaining that? I don't want to look paranoid, but a big red flag can't be a good thing. Thanks
I will say that LOR are not looked at the same as an SLOR. But you should've gotten an SLOR out of every rotation in EM. Lacking one *may* be a minor issue but if you explained it during the interviews, it's likely not a red flag. Maybe it's because you rotated at a DO program and it is not standard for them. You have to take it at face value and assume that DO programs don't all participate in SLOR.
Did you create MDapps?
Standardized Letter of Recommendation. They're pretty routine among EM LOR these days.Please forgive my ignorance, but what's an SLOR? I see the term thrown around but can't seem to find a definition.
Please forgive my ignorance, but what's an SLOR? I see the term thrown around but can't seem to find a definition.
http://www.google.com/search?q=slor&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari Google. It is your friend, young padowan...Please forgive my ignorance, but what's an SLOR? I see the term thrown around but can't seem to find a definition.
I matched at my 5th spot (out of twelve) a number of years ago. The top spots on my rank list were more competitive, but I don't think that was the main issue.
In hindsight, now having been involved with resident admissions at two locations, it is clear to me why I didn't do as well: I didn't play the game. Yes, you want good scores, good grades, good letters, etc. But you have to, unlike me, understand the politics and the game.
I attended a med school that had no EM residency, and I didn't have great guidance on how it all worked. SLORs are key. If you don't have them, it will be questioned. If you have weird alternative letters, it will be questioned. (I had a psych letter because I did really well on that rotation, and thought it would demonstrate uniqueness; it was probably questioned.)
If you do an away rotation, and don't get a letter, it will be questioned. I did an away at a prestigious academic center, not to get a letter or because I wanted to attend there (wasn't interested geographically), but because I thought it would be good educationally. Unfortunately, I stupidly did not hide these facts. I did end up learning a ton there and loving the rotation, but a got a lukewarm eval because the PD was put off for the reasons above.
You will be judged on your apparent intentions. Obviously you should not lie, but if you demonstrate enthusiasm and a desire to be in academics, you will be more heavily favored (especially at academic heavy programs). Despite most of us going to the community, the residencies are run by academics, and they want people to go into academics.
It's interesting to be involved in discussions about applicants, and then seeing their performance as residents. If there's a correlation between match list rank and resident ability, I think it's weak at best. I think it's incredibly hard to sense how somebody will perform as a resident, but of course we do the best we can to figure that out. I'm reminded a bit by that scene early in Moneyball, when all the scouts are discussing the intangibles about the players, and who will succeed and who won't -- in reality it probably doesn't matter very much.
All that said, I'm very happy about where I went to residency, and felt my training was superb. It's my humble opinion that I excelled despite whatever reservations other programs had with my application. Emergency medicine is awesome, and in the end, I'm simply grateful I matched at all and get to do this job.