- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 51
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm sure we can all agree that this whole process is such a crapshoot. Most of us have pretty good GPA's and MCAT scores, as well as, strong LOR's. As far as EC's are concerned, just about everybody has the volunteering, shadowing, research, etc. A lot of people have publications. Also, I'm sure many have good personal statements. It seems like everyone has followed the "formula" of what makes a good applicant. I realize that some people have extraordinary things on their apps and I understand why they stand out, but I'd say they're a minority. A majority of applicants have about the same stats/activities. I really don't see how the adcoms make their decisions. What makes person B better than person A if they basically have the same qualifications? How come one will be selected for an interview while the other will get rejected? I'm just wondering what is that extra something they're seeing in some applicants. Anyway, it sucks...ok, end of rant!