D
deleted696582
Most exciting thing about starting dental school: new Tinder swiping area.The new tinder
Most exciting thing about starting dental school: new Tinder swiping area.The new tinder
Good old pop psych. It's entertaining at the least...
I definitely thought it was interesting how it was accurate, but like the Neuropsychologist @WisNeuro on this thread mentioned, it's all just worded in certain ways to make it sound like it speaks to you. Psychologists don't recommend using that test to measure differences between people.Pop psych or not, if you identify with it and feel it accurately describes you, doesn't it have some value to yourself and others?
Meyer Briggs is not the test I would use, as it is not specific enough. I was thinking of using a profile used in the professional forum, and partnering with the division of mental health at my university/hospital to get a more in depth picture of applicants. Since many large corporations and government agencies already do this, I have put the question out on this forum because it is a metric which could be useful in putting together a class that was not only academically qualified, but also best for working together and providing quality healthcare. Any further thoughts? This is not a new idea, as it has been done in other countries and is well reported. We just do not do it here on a large scale in healthcare.
Since it has been done in other countries and is well reported, and you are looking to use a more specific personality measure than MBTI, I wouldn't be opposed. I would hope any method used would be well researched though.Meyer Briggs is not the test I would use, as it is not specific enough. I was thinking of using a profile used in the professional forum, and partnering with the division of mental health at my university/hospital to get a more in depth picture of applicants. Since many large corporations and government agencies already do this, I have put the question out on this forum because it is a metric which could be useful in putting together a class that was not only academically qualified, but also best for working together and providing quality healthcare. Any further thoughts? This is not a new idea, as it has been done in other countries and is well reported. We just do not do it here on a large scale in healthcare.
Meyer Briggs is not the test I would use, as it is not specific enough. I was thinking of using a profile used in the professional forum, and partnering with the division of mental health at my university/hospital to get a more in depth picture of applicants. Since many large corporations and government agencies already do this, I have put the question out on this forum because it is a metric which could be useful in putting together a class that was not only academically qualified, but also best for working together and providing quality healthcare. Any further thoughts? This is not a new idea, as it has been done in other countries and is well reported. We just do not do it here on a large scale in healthcare.
I wouldn't like it. I don't think personality has much to do with the ability to know when to be a team player ,when to lead, and how to interact with people. You can learn to appreciate your classmates because you are all stuck doing something tough together full time for four years. Everyone is at the same level, working hard. The classes where I find a sense of community with my fellow classmates have always been my hard classes. We all are stuck in the same boat. I think everyone learn to love their class, and learn how to work together after being stuck with them for 40+ hours for years... you'll probably see classmates more than family and loved ones.
Furthermore, I think tests like this would discriminate against introverts unnecessarily. People always bag on introverts, but introvert =/= socially awkward and/ or social anxiety. It just means that they feel exhausted after socializing for long hours. I think that interviewers already analyze how a person communicates with the people around them, and this would be something I think is unnecessary.
Everyone always says they value diversity, so why not value diverse thoughts and individuals? Diversity is not just appearance.
I think you are extrapolating too much. In fact, this may be the best way of including people who are different, as I am not sure that a class full of extroverts is in any way considered ideal. Too much assumption on your part. On the other hand, this may be a way to not only get a baseline for incoming classes, but monitor them in the future for problems....problems that may be caused by sources other than the patients (like faculty). In service to faculty on stress reduction and other important interpersonal communication skills may go a long way, both in D school and in post grad training. I for one am always looking inward when a student under performs. What did I or the faculty not give them/teach them/etc. Once this avenue is exhausted, I will look at the student.
As I have said numerous times before, dental education needs reform/advancement/interdisciplinary education. The universities have lots of experts outside of the D school. Let's work together.