- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 47
- Reaction score
- 2
Hey everyone, tried looking this up, but I couldn't find a satisfactory answer so I figured I'd ask this directly.
I'm an IMG. My issue is I'll be applying for the match this year and I was wondering if it would be better for my application to use an LOR from a relatively unknown, small county hospital clinical elective, or a research LOR from a big name program, like UCSF? (not an elective, just happened to know a guy that got me in so I was able to work in the lab for a while.) For the sake of this scenario, lets just say the content of the letters is roughly the same, basically want to know if name brand supersedes the type of work you did.
What would program directors prefer to see? Appreciate any advice anyone can give.
Thank you.
I'm an IMG. My issue is I'll be applying for the match this year and I was wondering if it would be better for my application to use an LOR from a relatively unknown, small county hospital clinical elective, or a research LOR from a big name program, like UCSF? (not an elective, just happened to know a guy that got me in so I was able to work in the lab for a while.) For the sake of this scenario, lets just say the content of the letters is roughly the same, basically want to know if name brand supersedes the type of work you did.
What would program directors prefer to see? Appreciate any advice anyone can give.
Thank you.