before I begin: Harvard.
So, what does a "hispanic" student from LA choosing Harvard over Stanford mean? Or Berkeley or UCLA? So if people go to Harvard for the reputation, do you mean, the reputation for being the "best?" Right? They are not choosing it for location, but reputation. (btw, how are you an expert on Hispanic students?) Can't just a "student" from LA choose Harvard over Stanford? I think you're getting way over your head with this statement, just edit it. Before you reply, think about PM if you're going to say something about another race.
So Harvard can choose from ppl from all over the world, because they have the reputation of being the best, but their demographics doesn't reflect Boston's demographics, i'm confused again by your point..... I believe DMU can be Harvard if it chooses to, and therefore doesn't have to reflect its surrounding. Assumptions, luck, class size, region, weather has more control than administrators, then how does "DMU rejects more students"?.... doesn't it have more control on who it rejects??.....
Since when did this become an attack on DMU? I read my old posts again, and Yeah i said DMU is a great school. I said if it was the "best" school, then it would get EVEN MORE applicants to choose from. Also, because Minorities aren't the only ones to reject DMU, that's why I tried to change your opinion that "most students" and not "most minority students" who reject DMU. Because it's not just minorites who reject DMU, dude. ppl can reject DMU for a lot of reasons (whether they are caucasian or not), but that doesn't mean it's not a great school. it works both ways, schools can reject and students can reject.
(BTW how is rejecting the most students something to brag about? How is that a good thing? Does that mean a school has a large applicant pool or a large pool of poor applicants?? Rejecting students hasn't been a successful bragging point for any alumni to boast about, i don't think it's common for Harvard to stand on it's merits of #1 in rejections as it's reason for being the best school in the nation (actually, I don't think Harvard is #1 in rejections, but anyways). I don't understand this point about rejections.)
If you know ppl who choose Harvard because of "Boston", would it be that hard to assume (minority or non-minority) people don't choose DMU because it's in Iowa? So how does DMU overcome that? I said "DMU is a great school, but it needs to offer more" because it needs to be the BEST school. The idea of "reputation" that you mentioned with "harvard" should be the tipping point. Reputation of being the best, if DMU strives for this, will overcome these negative notions about Iowa. The best will come because they want to go to the best, and even more will come for DMU to choose from. If ppl are uncomfortable with DMU because of it's lack of diversity, by lifting the bar in Education and standards, DMU can overcome this by improving an already high standard of education. Is this fair? No, but it'll help in bringing more minorities to the door and help overlook/outweigh the lack of diversity until it does become diverse. (btw, how does Creighton or ND get in the conversation with Harvard? Princeton, Stanford, yeah, but ppl choosing Harvard over CT or ND really isn't hard to see.....I mean seriously, choosing Harvard over CT and ND is like choosing #1 over.... what are CT and ND ranked??)
"I guess I misunderstood your ignorant statement" - haha. dude, read this again. it's funny cause you're claiming ignorance over an ignorant statement. but this is a side-point.
Clinton? haha. Dude, politics, it's getting slippery for you man. I think someone posted something about Romney in Iowa a while ago, man, that really fired up a lot of passion, haha.
"Classification system"... really stupid thing to say about ppl. It just is man. It's something you have to watch out, but you can take it back (simple edit function on SDN). I said, be careful, and I also said, "I believe you don't mean this." Btw the analogy of "forest and trees" is good, so step back, take a breathe, and look at what you wrote. I said, I know you didn't mean any of that in the way it's written, but it can be misconstrued.... it's on my old post dude... seriously.
Schools can change their racial make up as they have for years. Harvard, MIT (not MTI), Stanford weren't always diverse. Scholl wasn't either. But they didn't start accepting more from the surrounding areas, they got more applicants from around the nation (even though it's tuition is one of the highest). Scholl used their "advantages" over the other schools, advantages like Chicago, great alumni, mentoring, etc. Because DMU doesn't have Chicago, it's gotta find that other "advantage", and for DMU, my answer for them is to be the BEST in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery education in the country. That's how DMU can get diverse.
Lastly, I know of a great Chiropractic college in Iowa. It's in small town of Davenport. It attracts international students and has probably a great diverse student body. It claims to be the best and most Chiropractors (at least from Chicago) say it is the best. I don't know how it compares to other Chiro colleges, but by being the best, DMU can also overcome it's "in the middle of nowhere" stereotype (i'm exaggerating, but that's the point).