who actually got the benefit from taking "achiever" as a practice?

[atlanta213]

---

Members do not see this ad.

Who actually got the benefit from taking "achiever" as a practice?

I heard that achiever is way harder than real DAT.

I know it is good to go over hard exam, but I suddenly think that it could be worthless if the test material is out of scope in terms of difficulty (types of problems).

Any idea?

 

[futuredent22]

From what I've read Achiever is good because 1) it gets you used to the computerized testing format, and 2) it challenges you in the sciences.

I decided against using either Achiever for the reason you stated. I don't see a need to take a test that is way over the top in sciences and PAT and too easy in RC.

But others with very high scores attribute them partly to the Achiever and Topscore, so I could be wrong. It probably varies from person to person how much these tests help.

 

[hannah999]

I found mistakes in the achiever exams

 

[happyana]

are there any other practice exams out there?

 

[utdent20]

topscore is there and there is one free prac on the ada website. crack pat is also there.

 

[dent0317034490]

i thought achiever was pretty good my exam had like 2-3 questiosn that were mentioned from the achiever... the scores let u down but makes u study more so u're more prepared i thougth it was better than top score