People need to stop with the Black thing because honestly Obama is whiter than I am.
Are you like 75 percent black or something and it would be nice if people would stop with the black thing aka "Arab" but this is America. I am hoping that those people with that racist beliefs are just a small fragment of the population and wouldn't influence the vote either way.
I would rather have McCain win b/c people thought his goals and plans were better than McCain and not b/c he is white or b/c someone can't stand the idea of having a black person or any other minority in office.
Also, people need to stop making McCain seem ancient. Yes, I understand that he is in his 70s but so was Ronald Reagan and he did just fine. People, look at the issues and be an informed voter. That's all I ask. I enjoy discussing the issues and lets leave the nonsense out of it.
A pet peeve that I have is when people say Obama will bring the nation together. Ok then what? Do we really have 2 Americas like John Edwards claims?
Would you rather say that he was going to tear this nation apart?
What do you mean Ok...then what? What would you like to happen? Do you still want Rove culture still reign in Washington?
Obama promoting the idea of one America...regardless of income and political beliefs. I don't know why you are bringing up the Edwards when he isn't the democrat nominee.
Obama is good and so is McCain but totally different perspectives. I have nothing against Obama, since I'm a McCain supporter, but I just don't agree with redistribution of wealth. People are entitled to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness ... not money and healthcare.
I'm sure many of you out there, like myself, get upset with your COM when they mandate certain things and don't really listen to you. Is that how you want your gov't to act?
Let's possibly discuss Obamas health care plan. He says that if you're happy with your current employer insurance keep it, your private insurance keep it ... but if you don't have insurance the gov't with give/subsidize it for you. Now if you were an employer what would you do? I know that I wouldn't give my employees insurance if I know they can get it. Now we funnel millions in the "single-payer" system. Doesn't sound to good for physicians. Albeit everyone thinks you need to be altruistic to be a physician, it's certainly not something that's applicable in real life. People, especially physicians, need to take care of themselves first before they can help others.
If you can't cover your practices expenses how will you take care of your patients? This is a serious issue to think about.
Most physicians today can't afford health insurance for their employees just b/c of the rise in premiums and therefore they have to past the cost onto the worker. Most workers can't afford the premiums so many choose to go without which in my opinion is very dangerous...and what we have now and what McCain is offering in my opinion will not work.
I believe that the economy will straighten out and energy independance will create work and boost the economy. So the next big ticket issue is healthcare.
We already have gov't subsidized insurance....for those in congress, senate, military, senior citizens, and minors under the age of 18...the gov't could atleast provide the basic coverage for everyone and than people can choose or not to choose to get private insurance for the extra stuff. Which I think would be Ideal.
http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2008/03/a-detailed-anal.html
This article eloquent parts everything out...
Obama's key components here include:
* Establishing a new public program that would look a lot like Medicare for those under age-65 that would be available to those who do not have access to an employer plan or qualify for existing government programs like Medicaid or SCHIP. This would also be open to small employers who do not offer a private plan.
* Creating a "National Health Insurance Exchange." This would be a government-run marketing organization that would sell insurance plans directly to those who did not have an employer plan or public coverage.
* An employer "pay or play" provision that would require an employer to either provide health insurance or contribute toward the cost of a public plan.
* Mandating that families cover all children through either a private or public health insurance plan.
* Expanding eligibility for government programs, like Medicaid and SCHIP.
* Allow flexibility in embracing state health reform initiatives.
Democrats, like Obama and Clinton, tend to make an Americanized attempt at health care solidarity by crafting a structure that ensures everyone will be covered, not by a single government-run plan but by guaranteeing access to a mix of government and private plans. Clinton and Obama both understand that the vast majority of Americans are not ready to give up their private health insurance plans and that creates a political imperative to continue making private health insurance a part of any "unique American solution."
Costs drive down trips to doctor More people self-diagnose or do without in tough times
Prescription drug sales are slowing, and hospitals and doctors' offices are reporting more openings in their schedules.
Doctors say decisions to avoid visits to family physicians not only put people's health at risk, they also could lead to higher costs to the consumer.
When patients forgo or delay primary medical care, they risk getting sicker, increasing the chance of an emergency room visit or admission to a hospital, where medical care can be the most expensive, often costing several thousand dollars a day.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-fri-soaring-health-costs-oct17,0,4587869.story
This is a problem....and market based insurance won't correct b/c if it did than how we wouldn't have any problems now.
Assuming you support McCain shouldn't you be worried about the fact that he wants to cut employee based insurance ...which will cause more problems since this group insurance are available to many people who have pre-existing conditions unlike those where you have to buy it individual. He says that he will give huge tax breaks...but with the rising inflation (rising cost of food and energy) and sluggish growth in income...it won't be enough. HOnestly, it is better to deal with the insurance companies as a group as opposed as an individual...strength in numbers.
For example...My Dad had a heart 3 years ago...and the only reason who is able to get an insurance was b/c it was provided through his employer...now if he was to try to get one on his own my dad would not be able to afford it b/c of the high premiums if any insurance companies decided to cover him at all.
How would the McCain $5,000 tax cuts support those who have to pay $12,000 a year? What about those who are older than 65 years old...how will his tax cuts support those people.
You can't honestly say that you think McCain plain is even a viable plan.
California healthcare costs surge five times faster than earnings
http://www.latimesblogs.la
times.com/booster_shots/2008/10/
california-heal.html - 60k -
Plus with the rising health cost...you still are getting less and less coverage....so many people are basically paying more for nothing. How is this beneficial for the American economy and the health of her citizens.
The healthcare insurance watchdog group released its
analysis Wednesday of private healthcare insurance costs in California -- the latest in its state-by-state tally of how much Americans are paying for their healthcare insurance. It found that while the median earnings of California workers rose by just under $5,000 -- to $30,702 -- between 2000 and 2008, the average cost of an employer-sponsored family health insurance policy almost doubled, from $6,227 to $12,194.
And while employers shouldered the bulk of those increasing costs -- by all accounts a significant drag on businesses -- workers' contributions to their healthcare premiums actually grew faster, rising from $1,544 to $3,256 in that eight-year timeframe, according to Families USA.
The result: For an employed individual carrying a family policy with her employer, premiums have risen five time faster than earnings. And that rise has claimed much of California workers' meager pay hikes since 2000.
http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081016/A_NEWS/810160345/-1/A_BIZ
For family health coverage provided through the workplace, annual health-insurance premiums rose from $6,227 in 2000 to $12,194 in 2007 - an increase of $5,967, or 95.8 percent.
» From 2000 to 2007, median earnings for workers increased from $25,740 to $30,702 - up just $4,962, or 19.3 percent.
What would you do to solve this situation b/c many Americans simple can't afford insurance anymore and if they do get insurance they are not getting the same coverage/benefits that they would have gotten at the same price 5 years ago.