Hello all! I'm preparing for DO interviews and wanted to use this example of why I like the principles of osteopathic medicine, but wanted some opinions. I'd start off by talking a little bit about the history, and then what I specifically really resonate with is viewing an individual as a whole. We are not all one homogenous species, and while we're 99.9% genetically similar, we have so many factors that distinguish us from one another and these all play a role in disease. For example, a patient presents to the clinic (i.e. DKA) and you bring them to baseline, but you wouldn't necessarily prescribe them a medication that doesn't fit with their SES because they'll be right back in the clinic 2 weeks later. Instead, we take an approach of looking at changes we can make to their lifestyle so that we don't see them in the clinic any time soon. And of course, this isn't to say that MDs don't take this approach, but I really resonate with the fact that DO schools emphasize things like this in their philosophy.
Sound okay? I'm in an SMP in a DO school so it's not like I don't know anything about osteopathy, but I'm trying to think about how to adequately explain why DO. I'd also mention in my answer that I'm not a DO nor a DO student, so I recognize that don't know everything there is to know about osteopathy, but this is my understanding from my research and from my time as a student at a DO school.
Sound okay? I'm in an SMP in a DO school so it's not like I don't know anything about osteopathy, but I'm trying to think about how to adequately explain why DO. I'd also mention in my answer that I'm not a DO nor a DO student, so I recognize that don't know everything there is to know about osteopathy, but this is my understanding from my research and from my time as a student at a DO school.
Last edited: