Why is amide a poor leaving group (is less reactive compared to other carboxylic acid derivatives)?
Why is amide a poor leaving group (is less reactive compared to other carboxylic acid derivatives)?
Because he works in finance and was laid off, and still recovering from the depression.Why is amide a poor leaving group (is less reactive compared to other carboxylic acid derivatives)?
If you really mean NH2- as a leaving group, then you can rationalize this by noting that NH2- is somewhat basic (not super weak). Thus, they are somewhat reactive and make poor leaving groups.
@Teleologist
When people say an "amide" leaving group, does that mean like a CONH2 as a leaving group or does that mean like NH2-?
You seem to imply that NH2- is an amide?
Originally, I thought the OP was asking why CONH2 would make a poor leaving group.
@Teleologist
This may be a stupid question but:
1) Why is NH2- called an amide when it lacks a carbonyl group? It seems like it should be an amine like NH2 (at least to me lol)
2) If someone talks about an "amide" in general, do you need to rely on context to determine whether it is talking about a NH2- or a CONH2?