Some of the programs have both categorical and advanced slots, including I know Indiana and Ohio State at least. The OP from the general residency forum used a computer program to pull this together, but for the programs with both tracks the "other" line-item at the same program is filled (I assume the "filled" line is for the advanced slots). When I interviewed at places with both options, they always emphasized ranking both tracks and some even noted that if the categorical slots didn't fill they would shift those slots to the advanced list. My question is: would the unfilled list reflect this? For example, Ohio state had 6 slots total, 3 in each track. I wonder if in fact they matched 6 residents, all in the advanced track, but since their original ERAS # corresponding to the advanced track matched no-one, it says 0/3. I apologize if this makes no sense! (as if the NRMP ever does
) A trivial point maybe, but at the same time programs that don't fill often get stigmatized, especially on these forums, and I would hate for that to happen for a place that actually filled just because people might not have liked the packaged prelim medicine year.
All that said, i also interviewed at Schwab (and they have only advanced positions - so them not filling is real i think). Sort of an awkward day (lots of travel time between sites, wait time between interviews, etc.) but seemed decent overall, REALLY liked the PD Dr. Gittler and certainly no evidence of major malignancy. However, i must share that in the morning while we were waiting for the resident tour-guides in the work room a mouse literally jumped out from behind a radiator and ran across the room
Would hate to incriminate a whole program due to something like this, but still - hard to not have a bad impression, especially after interviewing at RIC the day before