I don't like to plug myself, but I talk about some of these issues in my latest blog entry. I think the blog post that started this is correct. Most of the things the op's link talks about, at least that I have gotten to yet, have happened to me, despite my best efforts to the contrary. I think the culture of debt indentured servitude as medical training needs to end, but I doubt it will any time soon. So you should keep your eyes wide open and know what you're getting into. I managed to avoid feeling trapped because I don't have debt. I could walk away from medicine now, make easily over 100k/year, and not care. That sort of freedom is empowering, and I know without it I would be really pissed off.
I've been widely criticized as being very negative myself. After being on SDN for all these years, I feel vindicated by watching bright-eyed pre-meds become far more cynical than I was ever portrayed to be, as people I advised on how to get into med school are now residents and I'm still in medical school. But they stop posting. They internalize it all and begin to hate the bright-eyed pre-med they once were. It's a strange metamorphasis.
But I don't think I'm bitter. I'm just reporting how I see things. I took a windy path because that's my personality and I feel like I need variety and challenge in life to be happy. You will not have the same luxuries.
Most of my time was billable and none of it, absolutely none of it, was devoted to "compliance," "defensive engineering," or "Futile Engineering." Any other industry would collapse if subjected to one tenth of the inefficiencies and sheer disregard for common sense that is the norm in medicine. I could tell stories of money and time wasted that would chill your blood.
This is the part of basic/translational biomoedical research I really grew to hate. That combined with difficulties obtaining research funding and the resulting career instability are the primary reasons why I have serious doubts about an academic research career for myself, despite being previously gung-ho about it.
My PhD wasn't in engineering, but that's basically what I did in a closely related field. The inefficiency and beuracracy involved there is extreme to the point where I spent half of my time dealing with beauracracy and half of my time doing experiments. The clinical world is nowhere near as bad in this regard.
The part I'm talking about is academic research, as opposed to clinical academics, which are completely different animals. It almost drives me nuts anymore when someone says "academics" because it means so many different things to so many different people.
oldbearprofessor said:
Fortunately, in over 20 years as a board-certified specialist I've never ever had an MBA or any hospital administrator tell me that I couldn't perform a diagnostic test on a child who needed it.
I just wanted to point out it does happen, even in academics. At my home institution you couldn't go on the transplant list unless you could show you could pay for it. The surgeon told my father point blank he wasn't getting a transplant without $250,000 and would die within a year. I was 7 years old. He even did have insurance, but they declined to cover the then "experimental" surgery that would last 15 years of mostly quality living. It makes me wonder about uninsured alpha-1-antitrypsin babies. But, you're not going to transplant them from the NICU so it's not really an issue for you. Another example is the simple fact that adults aren't getting an MRI unless they have insurance. A CT will just have to do.