- Joined
- Sep 24, 2010
- Messages
- 123
- Reaction score
- 0
Last edited:
no... SGU is not a better option... their board pass rates and match rates don't even touch DO schools. Even after the artificial inflation....Will DO's still have DO only residencies to "fall back" on if needed with the changes in the accreditation process?
If not, does this make SGU a better option than some newer DO schools with board pass rates of ~70%?
I do not mean any disrespect to ANYONE. Thanks in advance.
As far as I am aware, based on what the AOA president said at RVU to my class on Friday, MD's will have the option to apply at a DO residency. They are working out the details on how that will work as far as OMM... Please tell me which schools only have ~70% pass rates?
Short answer: NO.
Its complicated though. Although AOA residencies will be open to MD's, they MIGHT face the same bias osteopathic students do in the match when trying for these residency programs. I think the first couple of years will still show primarily osteopathic students in previously AOA programs. This is all just speculation though.
Also, dont go carib. If you think its getting tough for DO's, you havent seen anything until you have seen what the future will probably hold for carib students.
Will DO's still have DO only residencies to "fall back" on if needed with the changes in the accreditation process?
If not, does this make SGU a better option than some newer DO schools with board pass rates of ~70%?
I do not mean any disrespect to ANYONE. Thanks in advance.
no... SGU is not a better option... their board pass rates and match rates don't even touch DO schools. Even after the artificial inflation....
I think he meant USMLE pass rates. 70 is a little below the average, I believe (of those who attempt) but it isn't that far off from the pass rates a few years back and some schools may still hit this.
I was confused about this too. I could see some DO schools having that pass rate for USMLE.
OP, research osteo schools that have higher USMLE pass rates. There are a few that have 95-96% rates. Maybe look into those? Remember though that osteo students that actually take the USMLE are a self selecting group. Not everybody takes it.
have you ever heard of DO schools refusing to sponsor a student to take the USMLE based on COMLEX score or previous performance? Just curious. SGU does things like this in order to bolster their numbers. I don't think DO schools would care one way or the other about their USMLE pass rates but it is within the realm of possibility.
Let me clear something up, the OP is talking about WCU because they had like a 71% pass rate their first class. Is that bad? Honestly when you think about it's not terrible. DO schools that are just opening tend to have a little lower stats because they gamble on people that have 22-23 MCAT scores. I don't think mcat score has that much correlation to board scores but if you studied your ass off and only got a 22-23 there is a good chance youll have trouble with the boards, and im not saying this to be a douche. Also WCU's class size was only around 100 if i recall. But they also had like 4-5% attrition. Now let's compare that to a school like ross with 50% attrition or more and 90% pass rate. So only half of their class even goes on to take the boards and it's the better half; so you're either a good student or a bad one, no in between. The people that survive the boards are the people that survived jumping through all the hoops ross gave them so to them, boards arent so bad, lol. Would you rather go to a school with 4-5% attrition and a 71% pass rate or a school with 50%+ attrition and a 90% pass rate? hmmmmmm.
Will DO's still have DO only residencies to "fall back" on if needed with the changes in the accreditation process?
If not, does this make SGU a better option than some newer DO schools with board pass rates of ~70%?
I do not mean any disrespect to ANYONE. Thanks in advance.
Let me clear something up, the OP is talking about WCU because they had like a 71% pass rate their first class. Is that bad? Honestly when you think about it's not terrible. DO schools that are just opening tend to have a little lower stats because they gamble on people that have 22-23 MCAT scores. I don't think mcat score has that much correlation to board scores but if you studied your ass off and only got a 22-23 there is a good chance youll have trouble with the boards, and im not saying this to be a douche. Also WCU's class size was only around 100 if i recall. But they also had like 4-5% attrition. Now let's compare that to a school like ross with 50% attrition or more and 90% pass rate. So only half of their class even goes on to take the boards and it's the better half; so you're either a good student or a bad one, no in between. The people that survive the boards are the people that survived jumping through all the hoops ross gave them so to them, boards arent so bad, lol. Would you rather go to a school with 4-5% attrition and a 71% pass rate or a school with 50%+ attrition and a 90% pass rate? hmmmmmm.
This is a very good discussion.
Certain medical schools have board passing secrets that they only share with their medical students. This is why you should pick the medical school with the highest board passing rate.
Also, make sure you know what you want to go into prior to starting medical school. This way you can look at match lists to determine what medical school is best for you.
This is a very good discussion.
Certain medical schools have board passing secrets that they only share with their medical students. This is why you should pick the medical school with the highest board passing rate.
Also, make sure you know what you want to go into prior to starting medical school. This way you can look at match lists to determine what medical school is best for you.
for the record you choose the school that will give you the most tools for success and fits your personality the best, you dont go by the highest pass rates, lol.
Are you implying that passing and matching are dependent on the individual?
Hm...
Are you implying that passing and matching are dependent on the individual?
Hm...
are you implying that they aren't? Why don't you go ahead and give me more assurance on how I will be ok if I just work hard 🙄
Schools don't really impart boards testing secrets in order to get their students out there. In fact, most top schools leave boards largely up to the individual, provide a solid base of education, but insist they "do not teach for the boards". We have plenty of materials but it isn't like there is some deeper knowledge that makes students at my school match better than others or vice versa.
pretty much what he said, its your job to open up a book and review the material if you don't do it the right way then yeah it's probably your fault, lol.
I don't see how the comlex is becoming more difficult? And 70-75% is the average for first year DO schools, Paul. It's because at new schools you have a quarter that shouldnt be there that make it in because of their amazing ECs but can't cut it.
Just wanted to jump in and write a few things:
-70% pass rate, even for a new school, is bad. Even if its average, the school should feel bad. They have either taught poorly, or admitted too many unprepared/unmotivated individuals. Pass rates should be in the 90's% for any med school.
-Thant being said, its absolutely horrible advice to choose a school based on pass rates. This is nearly universally understood so its not really even a point of debate.
-Your ability to pass is fully on you...your school can enhance (and maybe, rarely, detract) your efforts to destroy your boards, but passing and performance is on you.
I assume they're going to write COMLEX differently (more like USMLE) with this new ACGME/AOA merger thing.
So you're saying that 70-75% isn't terrible because it's the norm for new DO schools? Yet you say that the high attrition rates at CaribMD are terrible even those that's their norm.
it's pretty clear which of those it is. A new school with regional bias is always going to have a decent amount of lower end stats. this happens with most new schools
Oh.
I wrote my last post taking into consideration the new ACGME changes. With all the MDs taking all of the former AOA ROADS residencies from us, I guess I was trying to say it was dependent on DO schools to get us into the residencies left over (i.e. primary care residencies at community based hospitals).
Basically, osteopathic schools get us family practice residencies, and it is up to the individual to get a specific family practice residency at a community hospital.
it's pretty clear which of those it is. A new school with regional bias is always going to have a decent amount of lower end stats. this happens with most new schools
it's pretty clear which of those it is. A new school with regional bias is always going to have a decent amount of lower end stats. this happens with most new schools
Oh.
I wrote my last post taking into consideration the new ACGME changes. With all the MDs taking all of the former AOA ROADS residencies from us, I guess I was trying to say it was dependent on DO schools to get us into the residencies left over (i.e. primary care residencies at community based hospitals).
Basically, osteopathic schools get us family practice residencies, and it is up to the individual to get a specific family practice residency at a community hospital.
I still refuse to believe you are this dumb.
You are a great troll, though...you play the part of ignorance well. Too well.![]()
I still refuse to believe you are this dumb.
You are a great troll, though...you play the part of ignorance well. Too well.![]()
yeah I dunno.... I don't get the point in people coming in and trolling with any level of complexity.
(this was my fancy way of calling this dude an buttgopher without being too direct...I've dismissed him so many times, I felt the need to be creative this time 😉 )
I still refuse to believe you are this dumb.
You are a great troll, though...you play the part of ignorance well. Too well.![]()
I can't tell where you sit on this, smalls... You seem to be agreeing with the guy who was disagreeing with you. Care to respond to my earlier post to you?
my point is, if a student does bad on the boards its their fault. new schools have lower pass rates because they accept a lot of students that wont prepare for the boards the right way. the school helps them the best they can, but ultimately it's the student's fault for faiing. I see what you're saying that it is kinda the schools fault for accepting but hey if they're taking a chance on you then you should be willing to up your game
Ignorant? Apparently you do not listen to the experts (users with more than 5,000 posts) at pre-allo enough.
flattery will get you everywhere 😍
You still never told me if I should go MD or DO!!!
Certain medical schools have board passing secrets that they only share with their medical students. This is why you should pick the medical school with the highest board passing rate.
Ignorant? Apparently you do not listen to the experts (users with more than 5,000 posts) at pre-allo enough.
my point is, if a student does bad on the boards its their fault. new schools have lower pass rates because they accept a lot of students that wont prepare for the boards the right way. the school helps them the best they can, but ultimately it's the student's fault for faiing. I see what you're saying that it is kinda the schools fault for accepting but hey if they're taking a chance on you then you should be willing to up your game
I told you, go Pod.
Again...I'm AWFUL with kids!
You may be right, Listic... no longer sure if this is a matter of too much free time or too little IQ.
You may be right, Listic... no longer sure if this is a matter of too much free time or too little IQ.
Yea, i've been following this thread with a touch of skepticism myself....now I see whats going on with him.
Definitely too much free time. I cannot believe I've racked up 100+ posts in only a couple of months! Maybe I should take some time off SDN, or go outside, or make a friend.
What do you think, Specter?