- Joined
- Dec 1, 2005
- Messages
- 89
- Reaction score
- 0
I was going to read misteriosostupid's post, but it's just too much work.
That's definitely not what I'm about 🙄
That's definitely not what I'm about 🙄
jetproppilot said:What I shouldve said instead is, I'm sure Mil's comments arent racially motivated. Rather, they are motivated by the fact that he thinks youre a punk.
militarymd said:Search and read my posts..... Boy.
Misterioso said:The fact he used an uppercase B is a giveaway to his motivation.
jetproppilot said:Huh?
I dont get it.
Misterioso said:The fact he used an uppercase B is a giveaway to his motivation.
miamidc said:Loser. That must have been what your name was and is for most of your life. Got any friends, Homey. Doubt it 👎 👎 👎
Danger Man said:Maestro, I can't thank you enough for providing the intellectual horsepower to help us anesthesia-types ("lazy") decipher blatantly racist comments like that made by mil. Along the same lines, if an attending surgeon/walk-on-water resident uses the term "a ss" or "A ss" to describe a junior medical student, I know that you will be there to elucidate the "difference" for all those other, less intelligent (or "lazy") people who may not pick up on the subtle, yet drastic, difference between the two terms.
Misterioso said:You backpeddling for Mil isn't going to rationalize it. You'd be much better informed if you read up on some history and the connotations of that word.
Danger Man said:Dude, I know the connotations of that word and I have no reason to think that Mil used it in that context. You are just upset because Mil (and others) have been calling you on your clueless, arrogant, and obnoxious (do I dare say?) contributions to this thread. To me, you are just searching for a way to criticize, what seem to be, very nice people on this and other threads.
Misterioso said:Actually I've never gotten upset in our discussions, rather it has been other people, including mil, who have attacked me because they didn't agree with what I had to say.
Andy15430 said:Yes indeed, you are a very skilled internet troll...I will give you that.
Misterioso said:Calling someone a troll and placing all your focus on them instead of the discussion has so far been your way of dealing with the fact that you haven't been able to hold a rational point in any of the discussions.
jetproppilot said:So Mil hasnt chimed in as of now, but I'm sure he will. He's not intimidated by anything/anyone , so I'm sure he'll elucidate the true meaning of his post.
I've identified your short stature and concominant Napoleanic complex despite your denial (cummon dude...it's TOO convenient that you're trolling on an anesthesia forum and coincidentally, the chick you "stole" was an anesthesia resident's girlfriend....I was born AT NIGHT but not LAST NIGHT).
If I meet a threat in real life, I'm gonna quell it Matt Hughes style.
I'm ready, willing, and able to quell your aspirations.
bullard said:That's issuing a physical threat.
jetproppilot said:I'm ready, willing, and able to quell your aspirations.
VentdependenT said:Lazy folks and whiners get ostracized real fast. I can't hang with these peeps and don't wish to be anywhere near them when, inevitably, old man chaos takes hold of a situation. You can't whine your ass or run away as fast as you can from that.
Non sequitur: Just the other day I learned the friggen real real hard way not to use even small doses of etomidate, or anything for that matter, on these sympathetic dependent respiratory distress people. First code in the am it worked like a charm, the 3rd one in the unit. Well....that sucked. Guys ok now but I digress. Cardiac stable my ass. You guys warned me and I low balled the hell out of the drug but fer cryen out loud....
I dont understand the I-need-to-take-an-awake-look-philosophy-when-outside-the-OR commonly conveyed to anesthesia residents...my chairman was against giving paralytics for non-OR intubations. Its B.S.
Misterioso said:Pure talent and ability will always rise to the top. You can't fake that stuff. People can, and do, fake to create good impressions.
If a group doesn't want you because of what others are saying about you then you shouldn't want to go there anyway. Never compromise yourself to fit in.
Venture out on your own. Work locum. Be your own independent contracting physician. Be your own man, answer to no one.
Danger Man said:Jet, what was his logic for not liking paralytics in these situations?
stephend7799 said:i
I echo above.. Be your own man. contract on your own. work locum .. you have skills.. no need to listen to fat cats in charge of groups to tell you how to behave when youve reached as far as you have.
stephend7799 said:I echo above.. Be your own man. contract on your own. work locum .. you have skills.. no need to listen to fat cats in charge of groups to tell you how to behave when youve reached as far as you have.
UTSouthwestern said:After having wasted an evening reviewing candidates to hire, I want to again emphasize to current and future residents that the easiest way to submarine your chances at a good job (and waste people's time reviewing your CV and interviewing you) is by being lazy, arrogant, and self-centered.
I had thought my group had found a great candidate from a great program on the east coast, only to have comments like "lazy, interested in only what's best for him, not a team player, arrogant, thinks he knows everything," etc. show up when speaking to his faculty.
YOU CANNOT JUST WORK HARD PART OF THE TIME. It will come out at some point and you will just screw your chances of getting a good position.
jetproppilot said:Yeah, til now, you were amusing.
Now I recognize you must be short in stature...probably 5'9" or less....160 lbs...definitely has an inability to score chicks...and you see surgery as the "manly" thing to do, to replete your diminutive self esteem caused by your Napoleanic body habitus.
Its not too late, Slim.
Even short dudes can make good anesthesiologists.
Misterioso said:👍
Some people live their entire lives being lead instead of leading.
LanceArmstrong said:Harsh, really harsh...I wonder if its better if your references dont remember who you are rather than this...
are you serious?militarymd said:Leading by doing Locums???? Where many poorly qualified anesthesiologists spend their life? I know because I'm using a lot of Locums right now, and the leave a lot to be desired.
ThinkFast007 said:are you serious?
Reason I asked was I thought Locums seemed like a pretty cool idea. From what I understand, if i wanted ot say just work for like 2 months straight in an area I could work there and get paid,etc. The locums job I thought paid for malpractice, etc. Granted from what I hear you will dumped upon w/ all the crap work. But it seems like it pays really well, and you have no real responsibilties. Basically, after you are done you can pack up and leave.
I guess teh downsides are you get dumped on, you have no 'home base'. I thought especially, if ppl had an interest in something 'outside' of medicine, like doing adminstrative work or small business, this could be a real 'quick' way to mk some easy $$.
Does this sound correct or am i just completely oblvious?
yesThinkFast007 said:are you serious?
Reason I asked was I thought Locums seemed like a pretty cool idea. From what I understand, if i wanted ot say just work for like 2 months straight in an area I could work there and get paid,etc. The locums job I thought paid for malpractice, etc. Granted from what I hear you will dumped upon w/ all the crap work. But it seems like it pays really well, and you have no real responsibilties. Basically, after you are done you can pack up and leave.
I guess teh downsides are you get dumped on, you have no 'home base'. I thought especially, if ppl had an interest in something 'outside' of medicine, like doing adminstrative work or small business, this could be a real 'quick' way to mk some easy $$.
Does this sound correct or am i just completely oblvious?
Noyac said:We currently use some select locums which are fine for us right now, as we move into a new hospital, and one of them we would consider highering but your comment about making more $$ as locums is not entirely accurate. I was speaking with our locums Doc today and she said that I made more $$ and had much better benefits. Locums in my opinion is fine for a short period of time when you are struggling with a place to live and type of job/group that you want to join. But I wouldn't consider it for long term (>1yr) unless I was looking to retire soon. Just my $.02.
The Sensei said:I have heard of it. If you want to locum and make the big bucks, anesthesia is the way to go. I just finished a 1 month gig and made $46k NET. 1 month my friend!
Misterioso said:supah,
Some of these so called "experts" that are advising you don't know what they're talking about. Check out this from a thread about locums:
jetproppilot said:If they are "at all" with it when you get there, Ventmeister, midazolam 2mg will usually buzz-em-out. If not, give a little more, until you see that they're buzzed. Still breathing, yes...amnestic and apathetic, also yes.
Then, sux 40-60 mg (if not contraindicated by prolonged-immobility, burns, hyperkalemia, etc).
I dont understand the I-need-to-take-an-awake-look-philosophy-when-outside-the-OR commonly conveyed to anesthesia residents...my chairman was against giving paralytics for non-OR intubations. Its B.S.
Assuming theres not a contraindication, sux is your friend, especially in difficult, foreign intubating environments (like on the med-surg floor).
Preoxygenate, allowing FRC to be (as much as possible) nitrogen-displaced, give an appropriate sux dose (just a little) and it'll allow you to intubate a motionless airway. And if things go awry, sux pharmacokinetic redistribution will have the patient moving/breathing in no time.
I dont understand all the hype for awake looks.
After having wasted an evening reviewing candidates to hire, I want to again emphasize to current and future residents that the easiest way to submarine your chances at a good job (and waste people's time reviewing your CV and interviewing you) is by being lazy, arrogant, and self-centered.
I had thought my group had found a great candidate from a great program on the east coast, only to have comments like "lazy, interested in only what's best for him, not a team player, arrogant, thinks he knows everything," etc. show up when speaking to his faculty.
YOU CANNOT JUST WORK HARD PART OF THE TIME. It will come out at some point and you will just screw your chances of getting a good position.
supah,
Some of these so called "experts" that are advising you don't know what they're talking about. Check out this from a thread about locums:
We see where your idiotic rantings got you Misterioso. Flippin' burgers?
Man, that was a quality flamewar from back in the day....I like the display of solidarity from the forum regulars.
I'm curious... how would you feel about a candidate who works really hard but wants to work part time?
.BINGO....this is why our specialty is turning into a laughing stock....
Being a physician is a FULL TIME committment...if you want to get pregnant and have kids then do THAT....don't become a doctor....at least NOT an anesthesiologist.
Go and become a GP, occupational health, or something like that...don't f uck up our specialty anymore than it is....
Wouldn't it be ideal to have enough trained physicians that every one of them can work 40 hours/week like the normal person? I understand the concern of continuity of care... But perhaps what we can fix is how we share information with the next physician. It seems to me that our society is moving towards creating a bunch of workaholics and drones... And I wonder if we will look back at age 100 (if we get there with the way we treat our bodies as physicians) and have serious regrets.
You are not serious are you?I think a lot of my classmates share the idea of working a normal work-week... But I think most of us realize we won't be making the same kind of bucks if we do. Who cares about money though... To me it's about having a satisfying life and job... and being healthy about both.
The reason why we're not on equal-footing with CRNAs is because we should be able to take care of complicated cases and bail them out when things go wrong... The way I see anesthesia in 10 years is CRNAs running all the bread and butter cases, and anesthesiologists overviewing them as well as doing specialty work (cardio, regional)... Why not give the easy part to nurses... Why should we waste our training with something others can do.
We should start by demanding from the ASA to clearly state that no anesthetic should be administered without the supervision of an Anesthesiologist, not any physician as they say now, but specifically an anesthesiologist and anything else should be considered substandard.
If the ASA is able to say that you should not give anesthesia without EKG monitor then they should be able to say you can't give anesthesia without an anesthesiologist.
If the ASA can not or will not establish this basic standard of care then they don't deserve our money.
This is the future we should be fighting for not giving away our identity to become something else that fits the agenda of the AANA.
You are not serious are you?
Anyone who tells you it's not about the money is lying to you.
It is definitely about the money, no question about it.
Those replies did not address my original point about the number of hours not making our job special (which was my main point).
Regardless, I was saying *I* don't care about money... hence why I said "to me... blabla"... I realize money is important to a lot of people... most people, probably.
With respect to the nurses... Everything in medicine is about patient care, and we are supposed to be practicing evidence-based medicine. If having a fully-trained anesthesiologist for basic OR cases is best, then so be it... But if having a crna with supervision is good enough, what is the problem? Defending our profession just for the sake of defending it is selfish. Society will (or should) eventually mold to what is ideal, and our role will likely shift.
Those replies did not address my original point about the number of hours not making our job special (which was my main point).
Regardless, I was saying *I* don't care about money... hence why I said "to me... blabla"... I realize money is important to a lot of people... most people, probably.
With respect to the nurses... Everything in medicine is about patient care, and we are supposed to be practicing evidence-based medicine. If having a fully-trained anesthesiologist for basic OR cases is best, then so be it... But if having a crna with supervision is good enough, what is the problem? Defending our profession just for the sake of defending it is selfish. Society will (or should) eventually mold to what is ideal, and our role will likely shift.
I have a strong feeling that you are really young, high school maybe??