Originally posted by hockebob
two things you seemed to have overlooked Insert:
according to your lists, NYCOM had 155 residency placements compared to mayo's 39 (four times fewer students)... that's a substantial difference when you start looking at numbers for specific residencies... especially, for example, the 26 anesthesiology placements (66% of mayo's overall class size). if mayo placed 26 anesthesiology residents, that would not be ideal. so let's look at percentages... 26/155 = 16.8% and 5/39 = 12.8%. thus, maybe mayo is "under-performing" in its ability to crank out anesthesiology residents or maybe, just maybe, since people have free will and the class size is so small there is too much potential for statistical variation to draw any firm conclusions. for example, if only two more mayo grads had decided to do anesthesiology then (7/39 = 17.9%) it would have had a higher percentage than NYCOM. can you see how useless this kind of comparison can be?
also, according to the lists, nearly half of mayo grads do their residences at mayo... which is one of the best all-around hospitals in the country (although i'm a little biased because i'm from MN and my sister works at mayo, but still...).
now, this takes nothing away from the point i think you were trying to make (which is that DOs can, in general, do just as well in residency placements as most MDs). however, just stating random "facts" in defense of that conclusion without any analysis is dangerous.
one final thought, i'm sure that mayo's rating from residency directors is higher than most DO schools, which, perhaps, is a much more telling barometer of the quality of residency placements than numbers or percentages.
aaron