- Joined
- Mar 5, 2011
- Messages
- 824
- Reaction score
- 202
Last edited:
I finally have an entry for this!!!
=================================
Interviewer: Ok, so your qualifications and resume are looking good. I'm just going to need you to sign this form here authorizing a background check. It's just to make sure you're not a serial killer or anything.
Me: Maybe I am
Interviewer:.......silence for 10 seconds
=================================
Doesn't AMCAS do that?
The school might also conduct their own 3rd party check.
Plus, that is totally not actual CPR protocol! Supposed to call 911, and then begin CPR 😀
Even before that you're supposed to make sure the surroundings are controlled/safe for yourself and the victim. Then check for consciousness and any other signs of life (pulse, breathing by either sight or sound). But now we're just getting nit-picky.
Even before that you're supposed to make sure the surroundings are controlled/safe for yourself and the victim. Then check for consciousness and any other signs of life (pulse, breathing by either sight or sound). But now we're just getting nit-picky.
Yeah, and if there are bystanders we are supposed to have the first person call 911, and the second person to get the AED 🙂
Sadly, didn't quite make up for the fact that I totally put my foot in my mouth during my first interview with a student. She was asking about my shadowing an oncologist and asked me what surprised me the most. My honest answer was that some of the patients were just so, and here's the foot insertion into oral cavity, stupid. I tried to recover by saying that what i meant was misinformed. That I had seen this woman who had been diagnosed with stage 2 breast cancer not seek treatment for 5 years (!) because she was convinced god would heal her. Comes in because you can literally see the tumor growing under her skin. I kept trying to recover by saying everyone's entitled to their beliefs but that she really should've gotten help sooner etc etc.
I couldn't pull the foot out of my mouth 😛
Result: waitlisted (to be fair, everyone from my interview date and later was WL so it's possible had it been earlier in the year, I may have gotten an acceptence. Who knows)
Interesting thought, but the difference is that StephBee's initial statement (that patients could be stupid [over their beliefs]) was offensive at best, and condescending at worst. When I read those first lines, I was pretty put off. I don't expect anyone to think positive thoughts about patients all of the time, but for that to be the one thing that was most surprising? The clarification made me think that the initial use of the word "stupid" was used more out of frustration (how could people not try to do more for their health?) than out of arrogance (how can people believe this garbage?).Maybe trying to correct yourself was the unnecessary part. A lot of the people that would have supported the woman's decision would not have tried to be politically correct about it either, why should you?
I agree with that. I wasn't trying to say whether it made a difference in the school's decision over StephBee, I was just remarking on that little bit from the interview.^ I agree with your analysis, but we are making the grand assumption that of all the factors that lead to a decision this one student interview was the deal-breaker, which IMO is a pretty bold assumption.
I agree with that. I wasn't trying to say whether it made a difference in the school's decision over StephBee, I was just remarking on that little bit from the interview.
^ I agree with your analysis, but we are making the grand assumption that of all the factors that lead to a decision this one student interview was the deal-breaker, which IMO is a pretty bold assumption.
Is it not safe to assume that if you were invited for an interview that your application is at very least on the fence of either being rejected or accepted, or do schools actually bother inviting people that were predetermined to be rejected? I mean, if anything the interview seems like is your last moment to shine and really sway the decision in your favor.
But the thing is that I'm sure most people interview well
You'd be quite surprised.
A M4 mentioned this article that I'm about to post. So I looked it up.
Interesting read and relevant to this thread.
New format for interviews at 8 medical schools and may spread to more with times. Kinda like speed dating, its speed interviewing across 9 mini interview sessions.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/11/health/policy/11docs.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&sq=student doctor network&st=cse&scp=3
MMI is hardly new. Most Canadian med schools and some US schools had them for a long time.
Really? Well I'm sure not everyone totally botches the interview at least...
PS: I look forward to being on the other side of the interview as a medical student 😀. M1s and M2s conduct interviews at my school.
Do you guys ask if they are members of SDN and formulate a dis/favorable predetermined opinion?
Oh, definitely, most people don't botch the interview - I didn't mean to give that impression. But plenty of people aren't stellar interviewees, either. The people who make it to the interview portion generally all have great stats on paper and have very interesting, if not unique, stories - so the interview becomes even more important to help differentiate them from one another. Passion and genuine excitement are worth a lot more at this stage than I think many applicants realize.
Being a student interviewer is a ton of fun, and also incredibly insightful. I enjoyed doing it during M1 and M2, and I feel like it gave me knowledge that will be very valuable come residency interview time. I definitely recommend doing it!
I never got asked anything about this website. If anyone brought it up it was the other interviewees. Not the interviewers. SDN has nothing to do with our file so I'm sure no one is going to ask about such unless u list being a mod as an activity or something like that or yourself bring it up.
A M4 mentioned this article that I'm about to post. So I looked it up.
Interesting read and relevant to this thread.
New format for interviews at 8 medical schools and may spread to more with times. Kinda like speed dating, its speed interviewing across 9 mini interview sessions.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/11/health/policy/11docs.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&sq=student doctor network&st=cse&scp=3
I would turn around and blackmail said interviewer, muwahaha!
I don't think your boss would want to see some of the stuff you wrote publicly about them on this message board. Why not just push that acceptance through and pretend this never happened.
![]()
I wonder if anyone from SDN has actually done this. Listed being a mod here as an activity and got questioned about it.
You'd be quite surprised.
Really? Well I'm sure not everyone totally botches the interview at least...
PS: I look forward to being on the other side of the interview as a medical student 😀. M1s and M2s conduct interviews at my school.
Oh, interesting... I guess I assumed from talking to other people at my interviews that most people had good interviews (or most people seemed like they would be good interviewees).
I had a lot of fun during my student interview. It was much more relaxed and conversational, in fact it didn't feel like an interview at all. And I agree that being an interviewer can definitely give you some perspective. I had to interview people for research positions in my lab, and it was then I realized just how important it is to ask questions during an interview (nothing's worse than seeing thiswhen you ask, "Do you have any questions for me?"). I used what I learned for my med school interviews. I'll definitely try to be a student interviewer, if my schedule permits! 🙂
Question: What would you say a weakness of yours is?
Answer: Sometimes I don't speak what's on my mind.....like....when I'm cold....and I want the AC turned off.
*Blank faces from the interviewers*
heard the following story from someone who does interviews for a medical school we will leave unnamed
interviewer: where do you see yourself in 20 years?
interviewee: exactly 20 years?
interviewer: yes
interviewee: to the minute?
interviewer: i guess, why not
interviewee: well it is about 11:00 so on the golf course
student accepted.
This was the 3rd one hour long interview at the school. I was tired from the first two and was trying very hard to stay as enthusiastic as possible:
I: So I see you do Archery!
Me: Oh Yes, It definately random, but Yes I have been doing archery for sometime now. ALTHOUGH, I really wanna go Big Game Hunting, because there is no better feeling than KILLING your own food, you know? (then I realized what I said, me thinking to my self "HOLY SH&T what did I just say, Did I just say I like killing my food! I don't even wanna go big game hunting why would I even say that crap!!!! OMG OMG OMG OMG).
I: (LONGEST PAUSE EVER!!!!), I usually go hunting with my shotgun but I would be very interested in trying out bow hunting!
Me: (thinking: OMG, thank god he goes hunting, OMG OMG thank youuuuu), Excellent, maybe I'll be able to go hunting with you next.
I: You never know!
its only been a week since the interview so I guess we'll see!
update: I was accepted, haha
How'd that interview turn out?
PI: You will need to work with rodents at this position! What animal experience do you have?
Me: Well. What do you mean?
PI: Just anything with animals.
Me: Uhhh I guess I have some....
PI: Like what?
Me: I have a dog..... And, uh, used to have a cat. And a hamster... those are kind of like rats, right? Oh and I had two birds. But yeah, mostly the dog.
PI: ... That's not really what I meant.
At the end of the interview, though, she said, "Well, I like you, so I think I'll hire you. So if you wanna work here this summer, that's cool."
It was a really strange / awkward interview, especially since I'd never been in a real lab setting before and had pretty much no idea what I was doing.. and I don't know how on earth she could have justified hiring me after I babbled about my pets like an idiot. But! Whatever! Not gonna argue with a good thing 😀