Good eye- I am a Blue Devil 🙂
It wasn't an actual interview, but it was the first time I met my Ortho advisor.
Her: "Okay, so I understand why you want to do surgery from your personal statement, but why Ortho instead of, say, General Surg?
Me: "Well, I love power tools. I like the emphasis on restoring function in Ortho. And I really hated all the scopes you have to use in General Surg. For me, using a scope is the most boring thing in the world."
Her: "Oh . . . well . . . actually, I'm primarily an arthoroscopist . . . "
Oops. She suggested I change that part of my answer. 😀
Was this at DMU? We have an interviewer who asks that question and wants to hear smoking as the answer...
OK so this was at my second interview and I prepared beforehand for this question after researching information about it. The interview was early this season, so I feel it has been a long enough time for me to mention it and tell all of you about it. Note to the interviewer: if for some reason you are wandering these forums and recognize me from the answer below, I just want to say that I had word vomit. apologies.
Before this question came up, the interviewer and I got along amazingly well. We complained about healthcare and obesity and public health, etc. Then, this question was asked.
I blame TV shows (like House) for making me answer this way. House, this is all your fault.
Interviewer: (had already asked me two other ethics questions, and this was the third) What would you do if you had an older male patient with gangrene of the foot, and he refused to have it amputated? Note, this patient is competent.
Me: ... well since, as a doctor, it's my responsibility to ensure the health and safety of my patients. Gangrene is deadly if not treated and will kill him. Therefore, I would obtain a court order to have it removed.
Her: .... O_O <-- literally, her face
Me: (trying to save myself) um... I read that hospitals have judges on call to help obtain them.
Her: ... I didn't know that .... *skeptical*
Me: ...
Her: ...
(we changed topics after that)
Result: Accepted.
Interviewer: So, your school has a great sports programs.
Me: Yes
I: There must be a lot of athletes on campus. How do the other students view the athletes?
Me: (Thinks: WTF?) Well, they're generally pretty well liked, except for the few that don't care about classes (what am I saying?). Actually, my roommate is a golfer!
I: How were things after that big scandal in (a sport)?
Me: I mean that was a few years ago.. (mentally trying to figure out how this relates to medicine?)
He continued asking me sports questions for most of the interview. Then, he came back with this winner:
I: You wrote that you're interested in pediatrics
Me: Yes, I shadowed a neonatologist and (he breaks in)
I: Well what are you going to do when the government decides to pay pediatricians 10 dollars an hour? WHAT are you going to do then? (Glares at me)
Me: Well, money isn't everything?
That's a different case entirely, though. Under those circumstances, you have to consider whether the child is pressured to conform to the parents' religious views. A court order is appropriate. When you're dealing with a competent individual who isn't under another person's authority, however, it's a completely different deal.Actually that is not a bad answer at all and the correct answer. In my biomedical information class we have a module related to ethics of medicine and this is exactly what they suggest. In their case, they point you to the beliefs of christian science and ask what you would do if parents are not letting you treat a child due to religious beliefs and the child could die without it. You get the court order was their correct answer to this. So your answer was equally as such appropriate. If they thought it that horrible, I'm sure they wouldn't have accepted you.
That's a different case entirely, though. Under those circumstances, you have to consider whether the child is pressured to conform to the parents' religious views. A court order is appropriate. When you're dealing with a competent individual who isn't under another person's authority, however, it's a completely different deal.
Steeler is actually right on this. The case you mention, about the child, is different since the child is not a competent adult.
What I was *supposed* to answer with was 'release him.' No, really. If the patient is competent and still doesn't want life saving treatment, you have to let him/her go. I told my student host what happened when I returned to her apt after the interview and she basically laughed and said the above.
I will never forget that interviewer's face lol O_O
Here is my worst interview moment:
Interview: What do you think the biggest health problem in the US is?
Me: Obesity, due to all the other diseases related to obesity.
(I then realize that the interviewer was an obese man...stupid rehearsed responses)
Rejected.
Two bad ones:
1) Interviewer: You have a lot of research experience. Why did you decide on medicine rather than going into research?
Me: Long-winded answer about how I really enjoy research, finding answers, etc, but ultimately realized I couldn't do it because it's so lonely in the lab and I need contact with people.
Interviewer: I'm a researcher.
*long pause*
wait. What ARE you supposed to say then when this happens? If you don't want to do research, then of course you must say why (i.e. the cons) . But if the interviewer does research, then you have to tell them why research is awesome. --- then why don't you want to do research?!
That's a big thing for me when approaching such questions. Maybe in some situations I know the law (like in the scenario with the child / religious beliefs) but I feel like these questions are more about backing up your argument logically. Anytime I'm not sure, I'll preface my answers with "I'd of course act within the law, but without knowing the details, I'd try this..." If what I say is illegal, so be it. They can teach me what's right to do for my next four years. Until then, showing good reasoning should be enough.We can educate you about the law as it relates to the practice of medicine.
That's a big thing for me when approaching such questions. Maybe in some situations I know the law (like in the scenario with the child / religious beliefs) but I feel like these questions are more about backing up your argument logically. Anytime I'm not sure, I'll preface my answers with "I'd of course act within the law, but without knowing the details, I'd try this..." If what I say is illegal, so be it. They can teach me what's right to do for my next four years. Until then, showing good reasoning should be enough.
Hey docbest did your bad interview experience happen at Carver Scool of Medicine? Sounds very familiar..like they ask you 4 questions and just stare at you and say absolutely nothing! LoL..please share!!!
one interviewer told me he looked my band up and listened to my music. I immediately facepalmed and said something to the effect of omg.
👎
Good eye- I am a Blue Devil 🙂
Interviewer: so what specialty are you interested in.
Me: well, assuming i get accepted into medical school, i would do a residency in internal medicine. If i still have steam left, i would like to get involved with
critical care/pulmonology.
be honest, how bad does it sound that i said assuming i get accepted,
that sounds arrogant.
i meant as in, this question is only relevant if i get into med school, so under that assumption internal med is my answer.
thanks for the reply "the poet sings"
i appreciate the feedback
My stupid, stupid error in my very first interview...
Interviewer: Well DOCnAbox, that about wraps everything up... Thank you for coming in.
Me: (Shakes hand) Thank you for taking the time to interview me Dr. Simpson.
Interviewer: Glare
Her name is Dr. Smith... I had an elementary school teacher that looked exactly like her named Ms. Simpson.
Result: Hold
Me at a recent interview in december:
Student interviewer: So if you could have 8 million dollars to do anything you wanted what would you do?
Me: " oh well, you know I would buy a big house for two million dollars, you know I cant deny that I want fancy things," wait did I actually say that? " and also invest in a research lab..."
Student interviewer: If you could be any flavor of ice cream what would you be and why?
Me: Oh I would like to be strawberry ice cream because its red
Honestly, I cant believe I answered like that-my nerves definitley got the best of me.
Rejected one month later, nevertheless, i didnt like the school and I think we all agreed it wasnt for me 🙂
Interviewer: So, what would you do if you were not accepted by our school? How would you improve your application to better your chances?
Me: Well, I would just go to XYZ school that accepted me.
Interviewer/Me: (quiet silence)
Later in the interview:
Interviewer: Would you attend our school if we accepted you instead of XYZ school?
Me: I'd have to think about it.
Interviewer: why are you here then?Interviewer: So, what would you do if you were not accepted by our school? How would you improve your application to better your chances?
Me: Well, I would just go to XYZ school that accepted me.
Interviewer/Me: (quiet silence)
Later in the interview:
Interviewer: Would you attend our school if we accepted you instead of XYZ school?
Me: I'd have to think about it.
Interviewer: So, what would you do if you were not accepted by our school? How would you improve your application to better your chances?
Me: Well, I would just go to XYZ school that accepted me.
Interviewer/Me: (quiet silence)
Later in the interview:
Interviewer: Would you attend our school if we accepted you instead of XYZ school?
Me: I'd have to think about it.
FWIW I also thought it was a neuron.
As for funny stories (this was an MD/PhD interview):
Me: My ideal career would be doing research on some neurological disease and practicing in neurology clinic.
I: So you shadowed a neurosurgeon, but not a neurologist. How do you know that you want to be a neurologist if you never shadowed one?
Me: (Crap! Backstory: shadowing doesn't matter as much for MD/PhD so almost all my clinical experience was as a spanish interpreter at a free clinic. I just asked my neurosurgeon neighbor if I could shadow him for a couple of days so that I could put down that I had hospital experience.) Umm...well, I don't really think that I could find an easy balance between a surgical lifestyle and running my own lab. It seems like it would be really hard to be good at both, considering that surgery would require a lot more time to keep your skills intact.
Of course, he was a surgeon who ran his own lab.
Result: Accepted. (!?!)
At one of my interviews the waiting room was really warm and my body was having a hard time staying cool. Then 5 minutes into my interview, I just started sweating perfusely after he asked me a easy, qeneric question, but before I could answer I wiped the sweat from my face with my suit coat and said "oh my god, I am so embarrased." To which he just laughed.
later...
Interviewer: "So what makes you a good leader"
Me: "I am very organized and can communicate effectively"
Interviewer: "Any examples"
Me: Mind blank..."I love spreadsheets"
Interviewer: Laughs, "I have never heard that before, definitely bringing that up in the adcom meeting."
again later...
Interviewer: "What is the best advice anyone of your family members has given you"
Me: "To know everything for tests"
Interviewer: Suprised/confused expression
I tried to make it sound not so over-achieving, but just rambled.
Suprisingly accepted after all this.
At one of my interviews the waiting room was really warm and my body was having a hard time staying cool. Then 5 minutes into my interview, I just started sweating perfusely after he asked me a easy, qeneric question, but before I could answer I wiped the sweat from my face with my suit coat and said "oh my god, I am so embarrased." To which he just laughed.
That is why I chose it. It just wasn't the most tactful choice in that situation.
Towards the end of the interview, I asked the same guy what he thought the biggest problem was. His reply was smoking.
Interviewer: The philosopher, why?
Me: No, the bald guy on Lost, you know the one who believes in the Island...I think he is evil now
Awkward silence
OK so this was at my second interview and I prepared beforehand for this question after researching information about it. The interview was early this season, so I feel it has been a long enough time for me to mention it and tell all of you about it. Note to the interviewer: if for some reason you are wandering these forums and recognize me from the answer below, I just want to say that I had word vomit. apologies.
Before this question came up, the interviewer and I got along amazingly well. We complained about healthcare and obesity and public health, etc. Then, this question was asked.
I blame TV shows (like House) for making me answer this way. House, this is all your fault.
Interviewer: (had already asked me two other ethics questions, and this was the third) What would you do if you had an older male patient with gangrene of the foot, and he refused to have it amputated? Note, this patient is competent.
Me: ... well since, as a doctor, it's my responsibility to ensure the health and safety of my patients. Gangrene is deadly if not treated and will kill him. Therefore, I would obtain a court order to have it removed.
Her: .... O_O <-- literally, her face
Me: (trying to save myself) um... I read that hospitals have judges on call to help obtain them.
Her: ... I didn't know that .... *skeptical*
Me: ...
Her: ...
(we changed topics after that)
Result: Accepted.
Holy crap, I think I had the SAME question at AMC... 3 tough bioethics questions. I actually stumbled through this question, because I was completely thrown off my rockers. I said, "Well, I would first make sure he's in the right state of mind (maybe then the interviewers stuck in the fact patient is mentally capable)... Well I would honor the patient's wishes after a loooong talk."...
Interviewer: Describe your best friend
Me: He is a great guy. I have known him for a long time. We have a lot in common. We grew up together, went to the same elementary, middle, high school and college. In college we were actually roommates. Currently we rent a house together.
Interviewer: Are you homosexual?
Interviewer: Describe your best friend
Me: He is a great guy. I have known him for a long time. We have a lot in common. We grew up together, went to the same elementary, middle, high school and college. In college we were actually roommates. Currently we rent a house together.
Interviewer: Are you homosexual?
I demand to know the end of this conversation.
Very Seinfeld moment there!The end wasn't pretty. My initial reaction was to laugh. As I was doing that my interviewer had a completely serious look on his face. So I thought to myself who knows maybe this guy is gay. So I said "no ofcourse not, not that anything is wrong with being gay though." He then changed the subject. The rest of the interview was a little awkward. I ended up getting waitlisted.