- Joined
- Sep 30, 2003
- Messages
- 7,684
- Reaction score
- 6
smugass said:which specialty if the DUMPING GROUND of all specialties?
Path
smugass said:which specialty if the DUMPING GROUND of all specialties?
Paws said:Octo dude, look at all them smiley faces you got there ...
The worst specialties. Hmm. I don't think any specialty is really bad, actually. They all have their place, and have their share of dedicated people trying to help people.
Although...
I don't want to be feeding and watering gomers all day. So IM is out.
While the thought of dealing with weird diseases is cool, I don't want to spend half my day writing scrips for HIV cocktails, and the other half cleaning up surgical infections. ID is out.
I want to be able to rely on my knowledge and brainpower to solve cases, not hammers and saws. Ortho is out.
I don't want to be locked away from the patients, looking at studies for other doctors. Path and rads are out.
I don't want to deal with kids because kids are icky and gross... therefore, peds and FP are out.
I don't want to be in a service where most of your job is thinking up new ways of telling your patients "You're gonna die." Heme/onc is out.
I don't want to be spending the rest of my life taking gall bladders out of fat people. GS is out.
I don't want to be Pimple-Popper, M.D. Derm is out.
I also don't want to be putting in silicone boobs all day and call that "medicine." Plastics is out.
I want to actually have some idea on what's wrong with the patients. Psych is out.
I don't want to be a glorified triage nurse. EM is out.
As tempting as looking at diseased genitalia all day might be, I'm going to have to pass. OB/GYN and uro are out.
Same thing with the other perineal triangle. GI and colorectal are out.
Therefore, upon reflection, I'm going to be a lawyer.
Here's a fun thread - if you had to make a list, which specialty would you most want to avoid? Which do you think is the worst in general and/ or the worst for you, and why?
This could turn ugly... or be funny
nice bump of an 8 year old thread. I was a senior in high school when this thread was last discussed.ha ha haha i was going down your list thinking "so what's left"....and then i read your last sentence. XD
10 year old. and I'm ashamed to admit I'm still here following this threadnice bump of an 8 year old thread. I was a senior in high school when this thread was last discussed.
worst and most boring are two very different things, IMO
It's "Preventive", not "preventative" /peevesGeriatrics---I don't like old people
Peds---or kids.
Medical genetics---Welcome to Dullsville. Population: you
Preventative Medicine---Wear a condom if you want to prevent the spread of disease.
Ob/Gyn---Gross
Family Medicine---Why not become a real specialist?
Derm, urology, and optho---I don't see how you have to graduate at the top of your class to be in these specialties.
I can't count no goods tonight10 year old. and I'm ashamed to admit I'm still here following this thread
I'm even more ashamed now that I see I posted on page 1.I can't count no goods tonight
I'm even more ashamed now that I see I posted on page 1.
I haven't updated yet, and yes.If you were a med student 10 years ago, how are you still in residency? PhD?
And zoos.Zebras live in herds, by the way.
I wonder how many of them still participate in clinical medicine.I wonder how many of the 2006 folks still have the same opinions?
Just don't say anything like this at your residency interviewsI am honestly energized by interacting with suicidal crying teenagers.
Just don't say anything like this at your residency interviews
It's probably okay to say you're energized by them, but don't mention drinking their tears to increase your vitality...Just don't say anything like this at your residency interviews
Love the thread topic, for once the necrobump yields something worthwhile. As for worst/most boring fields...
Most boring:
Rads: The idea of sitting in a room trying to figure out whether I actually see something on film or not would drive me crazy. IR might be more bearable, but still sounds pretty awful.
Path: Love reading about path and learning about zebras, but I need to interact with people if I want to stay awake.
Heme/Onc: The basic science and molecular aspect of it is awful. Probably the only field that I would rather quit medicine than actually have to go into.
Gas: Getting paid to play games of my phone or do crosswords sounds like a sweet gig, but I'd rather actually do something.
Worst:
Peds: Some patients are fine, but the idea of having to see screaming kids, or worse, their parents, makes me want to scream. Also, anti-vaxxers.
EM: At a Level 1 trauma center or a location where you mostly get actual emergencies it would be pretty cool, but some of the places I've worked and volunteered where 90+% of the patients are either uninsured and use the ER as primary care, parents who bring in Little Timmy because he coughed once and was "running a fever of 99" for 5 minutes last night, or the frequent flyer who is back for the 4th time this week because their finger is twitches every couple of hours is its own special kind of hell.
Just don't say anything like this at your residency interviews
This post makes me question if you have any clinical experience whatsoever
This post makes me question if you have any clinical experience whatsoever
I guess to each his own, but I pretty much disagreed with every opinion in that post.
And I guess I forgot that emergency departments only see mis, strokes, dka, aaas, gi bleeds, elderly abdominal pain, sepsis, drug overdose, ectopic pregnancy, sbp, pes, and mvas at level 1 trauma centers.
I'll admit my clinical experience in anesthesia is limited to my contact with them through working/shadowing other fields (aka time in the OR), and I have no clinical experience in path. I've worked a decent amount in rads and EM departments which were exactly as I described.
I'm not saying those only happen at level 1 centers, but the level 2 trauma center I worked at for years averaged about 5% actual emergencies and was 95% not. Of that 95% that wasn't, I'd say 60-70% of those patients had no business coming to the ER as I described above. Of the things in your list, we'd be lucky to see 10 patients in a week that needed to be examined for any of the conditions you listed above. Most of our patients were like the kid I described, uninsured people coming in for a check-up, or elderly pts who came in with SOB that turned out to be nothing (yes, they should be coming in, but they were mostly boring cases).
As I said, the patients ERs see vary a lot from hospital to hospital. My point was that at least with a Level 1 center you're guaranteed to see a good number of patients you actually want to see instead of the bs that most EM docs complain about.
I'll admit my clinical experience in anesthesia is limited to my contact with them through working/shadowing other fields (aka time in the OR), and I have no clinical experience in path. I've worked a decent amount in rads and EM departments which were exactly as I described.
I'm not saying those only happen at level 1 centers, but the level 2 trauma center I worked at for years averaged about 5% actual emergencies and was 95% not. Of that 95% that wasn't, I'd say 60-70% of those patients had no business coming to the ER as I described above. Of the things in your list, we'd be lucky to see 10 patients in a week that needed to be examined for any of the conditions you listed above. Most of our patients were like the kid I described, uninsured people coming in for a check-up, or elderly pts who came in with SOB that turned out to be nothing (yes, they should be coming in, but they were mostly boring cases).
As I said, the patients ERs see vary a lot from hospital to hospital. My point was that at least with a Level 1 center you're guaranteed to see a good number of patients you actually want to see instead of the bs that most EM docs complain about.
Don't worry. It's just butt hurt EM hopefuls that will eventually come to realization that EM isn't that great. 90% is a hyperbole, but at least 50-60% of the patients should have gone to a FP doc. The next 20% are probably drug seekers, homeless people, alcoholics, chronic pain, etc. The next 10-15% is your run of the mill pathological abdominal pain, chest pain, infections, and fracture. About 1-5% is actual critical care.
~4 years in 5 hospitals, two different systems, from the very rich to the very poor. Includes a LOT center.
Don't worry. It's just butt hurt EM hopefuls that will eventually come to realization that EM isn't that great. 90% is a hyperbole, but at least 50-60% of the patients should have gone to a FP doc. The next 20% are probably drug seekers, homeless people, alcoholics, chronic pain, etc. The next 10-15% is your run of the mill pathological abdominal pain, chest pain, infections, and fracture. About 1-5% is actual critical care.
~4 years in 5 hospitals, two different systems, from the very rich to the very poor. Includes a LOT center.
It's definitely true there's a lot of variation between sites, but I would point out that even 5% actual emergencies means there's a patient on almost every shift who needs you. The lower proportion of positives makes it as challenging or more so to provide good care to those people, which can be pretty interesting. To each his own though.
My no thanks would be outpatient peds. Healthy patients aren't really my thing, and parents are definitely not my thing
I'll admit my clinical experience in anesthesia is limited to my contact with them through working/shadowing other fields (aka time in the OR), and I have no clinical experience in path. I've worked a decent amount in rads and EM departments which were exactly as I described....
Boring. If you were a specialty I'd put you in this thread.It makes me sad that medical students are able to get through school with these kinds of impressions of various fields that their colleagues will be practicing.
You've worked as a diagnostic radiologist?
My specialty is the best. Everyone else is stupid.
Most Boring - dermatology , peddling cosmetics to most patients is not worth 12 years of training