I recognize that this classification is meant to assist with holistic review, especially in identifying applicants with limited socioeconomic resources as they and their families grew up. However, this angst about being classified resembles the "ORM/URM", racial classification "debates" many applicants have, in that applicants whose parents have higher education degrees immigrated to the US will feel disadvantaged (see
ORM diaspora).
And understandably so. I would imagine the category was intended to help uplift families like mine, who have had generations piled on top of generations of individuals who never received
any formal education.
When my parents arrived to the US as teens, nobody knew what to do with tens of thousands of new students who did not have any English proficiency or organized experiences at a school. They just said "congratulations" and handed them a high school diploma, knowing that they would probably end up in local factories where speaking the language was unnecessary. And, of course, they did, because there was no other choice.
It's still embarrassing for me to admit that my parents do not speak either English or Spanish (our native language) particularly well. It's hard for me to look back at this juncture, entering medical school, and seeing that I surpassed my parents intellectually back in the third or fourth grade (I am being generous)... and had to leave them there, or risk stagnating like they did. It is so lonely, on top of the whispered fact that public education may be "free" to attend, but not necessarily to participate in. The missing opportunity is not just "having parents" as supporters and facilitators, but really the collapse of the entire educational framework we tend to take for granted in these conversations.
I realize it may come across bitter and juvenile to point out, but I find it offensive that even the nominal categories used to identify disadvantaged students can still find ways to be applied to students with university-educated, physician parents who are practicing in the US and have the gamut of Bourdieusian forms of capital we normally associate with professionals.
Unpopular opinion these days.