.........on my personal statement, that i just like to sit on my ass all day and have minimal patient contact?
i doubt people would believe me if i just said "i like to make people feel at ease with no pain."
btw, i'm not trolling. I'm just trying to figure out if i should tell the truth or not on my PS.
dude, I think you meant to post that on radiology or pathology.
so I'm not saying they are lazy. it just seems impersonal and almost non-altruistic. You don't go into anes to develop relationships with pts.
so what else is left.........
ayayay! again, go yell at rads or path. btw, what do u think the motivation for derm is...or plastics for that matter?
Not that I need to justify this or any other specialty to you but...
physician = scientist + clinician in different combinations
path = 99.9% scientist + 0.1% clinician or something close to that
rad onc = 90% scientist/research-nerd + 10% clinician
radiology = 10% scientist + 0% clinician + 90% recluse/hermitt
anesthesiology = 70% scientist (specifically
chemist) + 30% clinician
Internal med = 30% pure scientist + still 100% clinician
I could go on and on
it all depends on what your inclinations are as an individual.
If you spent more of your undergrad career pre-med school TA-ing chemistry/physical chemistry labs, writing papers in chemistry etc, anesthesiology may be a natural fit for you.
For physics majors out there, rad-onc seems to be a big draw. If you were on the college swim/football/ whatever else team and you were occasioned to have a few arthroscopic procedures by the time you got to med school, you probably had early enough exposure to want to choose Ortho and will find like-minded people there as well.
Most people fall somewhere in between, spread across the specialities.
So before you rush to frown upon anyone's motives for going into any specialty, you should probably consider that there are several more factors that go into such a gargantuan decision than just profit-making motives.