- Joined
- Dec 20, 2005
- Messages
- 429
- Reaction score
- 10
I understand the logic, but think in terms of practice - no one would say that. It reeks of a subtle attempt by a DO to try and pretend as though they're akin to MD. Whether they are or not isn't my point. In fact, if a doctor believed their equivalence, he wouldn't have bothered to mention both to some douche bag from a Saudi med school.
So here's something about PCOM...
The MD/PhD who is a buddy of my uncle's was a professor/scientist at UPenn at the time (now working with some pharm company or something). He told me that PCOM was as good as any of the med schools in Philly, including his. Hell, there are about a million PCOM DO's on staff at UPenn, including the director of cardiology: http://pennhealth.com/Wagform/MainPage.aspx?config=provider&P=PP&ID=5286
At PCOM-philly, you will rotate with students from Temple, Jeff, UPenn, and Drexel. The medical education doesn't get much better than what they've got going in Philly. If you land PCOM, take it and close up shop.
I am headed to their new one in Georgia, for specific reasons, and it looks like they will be carrying on the tradition. At least, I am hopeful.
Hey guys,
Please don't flame me for asking this question, because I truly believe MD=DO, but it IS harder to gain entry into a super-competitive allo specialty with a DO as opposed to MD.
This is NOT an MD vs. DO thread and I'm posting it here because I want opinions from those who are leaning towards the MD.
I was speaking to my physician and I mentioned that I am considering going to osteopathic school. After telling him about my personal statistics, he basically advised me to do an SMP and re-apply to MD schools because he thought I was a borderline candidate at this point and if I applied to schools after an SMP I would probably have a good chance to gain entry into an allo school.
Here's the thing: I graduated 1 year ago so taking an extra yr off would put me a little more behind. I really want to start my career but at the same time I really want a good shot at some of the more competitive specialties.
So do you think I should risk it with the SMP?
You make me water at the mouth, haha. Here's to next season and applying!So here's something about PCOM...
The MD/PhD who is a buddy of my uncle's was a professor/scientist at UPenn at the time (now working with some pharm company or something). He told me that PCOM was as good as any of the med schools in Philly, including his. Hell, there are about a million PCOM DO's on staff at UPenn, including the director of cardiology: http://pennhealth.com/Wagform/MainPage.aspx?config=provider&P=PP&ID=5286
At PCOM-philly, you will rotate with students from Temple, Jeff, UPenn, and Drexel. The medical education doesn't get much better than what they've got going in Philly. If you land PCOM, take it and close up shop.
I am headed to their new one in Georgia, for specific reasons, and it looks like they will be carrying on the tradition. At least, I am hopeful.
I work in a hospital just outside of the city, and I know of a bunch of DOs on staff that went to PCOM, at least one being family practice and we all love her (this is just off the top of my head, there are many more). While I know they say you often change your specialty after 3rd year rotations, I'm pretty sure Family Practice and Internal Medicine have more residency spots than they do residency applicants (not sure about Peds). If you're not set on an uber-competitive specialty, then take the DO acceptance.Yea, I heard really great things about PCOM also.
Congrats on your acceptance btw!
I think it's the school to go into if specializing is your goal, so I know I'd be lucky to get in. I am interviewing at PCOM-philly and I heard they have awesome rotations. Like I said I was excited about all my interviews before nit-picking my future and focusing on other peoples' opinions. My doc had nothing against DO's but seemed to be certain they were mostly primary care docs, maybe bc he was old school. It seems though that many other people have different experiences. And I know focusing on one person's opinion is a thing that I need to get over
Hey guys,
Please don't flame me for asking this question, because I truly believe MD=DO, but it IS harder to gain entry into a super-competitive allo specialty with a DO as opposed to MD.
This is NOT an MD vs. DO thread and I'm posting it here because I want opinions from those who are leaning towards the MD.
I was speaking to my physician and I mentioned that I am considering going to osteopathic school. After telling him about my personal statistics, he basically advised me to do an SMP and re-apply to MD schools because he thought I was a borderline candidate at this point and if I applied to schools after an SMP I would probably have a good chance to gain entry into an allo school.
Here's the thing: I graduated 1 year ago so taking an extra yr off would put me a little more behind. I really want to start my career but at the same time I really want a good shot at some of the more competitive specialties.
So do you think I should risk it with the SMP?
I'm a little confused, are you already accepted to any DO schools?
If so, I would go with that and get started. As long as you do well and get a high USMLE score you should be able to match into the specialty you desire. As others have said, PCOM has a good history of matching into all specialties. I'm a student in Philly and have lived here my whole life, I can tell you the school is well regarded. No way would I give up a spot, waste 2 more years, just to have a slightly better shot at getting an MD acceptance.
Does MD open a few more doors to some specialties? Maybe, but that can be debated. Is it better to go to Harvard then Podunk State? Probably, but I wouldn't waste a few years trying to build up my credentials to go to Harvard. In the end, no one is really going to care where you went to school or what the initials are after your name. It's more about what you accomplish on your own. Talk to some recent graduates from DO schools. See what they are doing now.
No I have 6 interviews, which is why I'm trying to decide before I get an acceptance (blatantly and probably tactlessly assuming that I will). I'm not sure if I will attend most of these interviews due to cost as well.
I also want to be fair to the schools and other DO applicants. Like I said when I applied I was all gung-ho about MD and DO schools; its just my recent discussions that have made me question things.
Hungarian, huh.
My mother is an MD and she encouraged me to apply DO. Sorry your family has no clue.
There are 100+ DO only dermatology spots.
I counted 99, although these are the ones approved by the American Osteopathic College of Dermatology.
Regardless, there are approximately 1,000 MD dermatology spots, so given that DO's make up 17% of current domestic medical school graduates, one is at a statistical disadvantage as a DO.
Also consider that in 2007, over 50% of graduating osteopaths entered the allopathic match, with 68.8% matching. The match rate for senior allopathic students was 93.4%.
I understand that the burgeoning DOs here are exicted about their future careers and opportunities, but it's sobering to realize that the AOA has been allowing new schools to open without increasing residency positions to accomodate graduates. Digest this for a moment:
![]()
According to a 2005 JAMA article, there are a total of 19 osteopaths currently among the 1,000 MD derm spots. Given that 47% of osteopaths apply to enter allopathic residencies, this means that either some programs discriminate against osteopaths or very very few osteopaths have any desire to enter dermatology.Regardless, there are approximately 1,000 MD dermatology spots, so given that DO's make up 17% of current domestic medical school graduates, one is at a statistical disadvantage as a DO.
I wonder how much of the delta between allopathic and osteopathic applicants is due to testing. Do any DO schools teach to the USMLE's, or do osteopaths do this on their own in addition to studying for COMLEX? I've heard from friends that though many allopathic programs accept the COMLEX scores, it is usually wise to take the USMLE, which has to be an annoying hurdle.Also consider that in 2007, over 50% of graduating osteopaths entered the allopathic match, with 68.8% matching. The match rate for senior allopathic students was 93.4%.
This is a concern that I have. I think that residency programs across the board are going to be more competitive and that squeeze is going to be felt by everyone. What I think you're going to find is that more and more folks hoping for popular residencies are going to be left more likely to enter less popular residencies, which right now are (sadly) primary care.I don't have fancy graphs, but I've also heard that even though there has been some modest increases in MD positions, with more to come, there has been virtually no increase in MD residency spots. Add that to what Gut shot is saying about DO student increases without corresponding increases in DO residency programs, and it appears that residency programs are going to be increasingly competitive for everyone until these discrepancies have had a chance to even out, which may take some time.
AOA's not alone there. The allopaths need to start increasing their residency spots or you're going to find more and more disgruntled PCPs...As for the number of residencies, I completely agree. AOA does need to get a move on in terms of increasing the number of specialty residencies. There are plenty of primary care residencies, and many go unfilled, but there definitely does need to be more specialty residencies to match the growing number of physicians.
Absolutely. I just don't think that things like this tide are communicated effectively to medical students, much less pre-meds.Of course, the problem of having too many specialists and not enough PCPs is certainly something to think about, and cutting back on the number of specialty residencies/fellowships would certainly do something to correct the balance.
Absolutely. I just don't think that things like this tide are communicated effectively to medical students, much less pre-meds.
If I opt to go specialty and can not, I'm completely content being a FP somewhere. But there's lots who aren't. And I shudder at the thought of a lot of these type A med student personalities who are driven to thoracic surgery to only find PCP specialties available to them. That'll make for some disgruntled health care providers.
This has been asked before and I believe the consensus was that it's a really, really bad idea. Why did you even apply to a school you didn't want to go to? That is the question all schools will ask when you reapply the next year. Chances are, you won't even get a chance to answer it, since they'll just skip over you for an interview.
I think if PCPs were compensated as well as the specialties, that there would be a lot more people that would go that route.
I agree, but I think the specialists can make a pretty good arguement along the "more highly trained=more money" lines. As important as PCPs are, I can't begrudge someone with more schooling making more money.
I say that as someone who would like to go into primary care.
No, I know they don't really know about DO's.
They think it's better to go the FMG route. Not that they're ignorant, they just have no experience working with doctors who have different degrees in Europe. I have an Eastern/Western European mix in the family these days and about 4 doctors all with degrees from abroad and all living and working there at least half of the time. One of my uncles came to the US to practice and he's doing pretty well for himself as an MD FMG, but he had to go through a lot of crap to get there. I don't really want to deal with finding my own residency without going through the match process through an American school, be it MD or DO.
Is your mom an American MD?
If I opt to go specialty and can not, I'm completely content being a FP somewhere. But there's lots who aren't. And I shudder at the thought of a lot of these type A med student personalities who are driven to thoracic surgery to only find PCP specialties available to them. That'll make for some disgruntled health care providers.
This assumes that there is an equivalent number of DOs and MDs that want to go into dermatology, which is not true.
I counted 99, although these are the ones approved by the American Osteopathic College of Dermatology.
Regardless, there are approximately 1,000 MD dermatology spots, so given that DO's make up 17% of current domestic medical school graduates, one is at a statistical disadvantage as a DO.
Also consider that in 2007, over 50% of graduating osteopaths entered the allopathic match, with 68.8% matching. The match rate for senior allopathic students was 93.4%.
I understand that the burgeoning DOs here are exicted about their future careers and opportunities, but it's sobering to realize that the AOA has been allowing new schools to open without increasing residency positions to accomodate graduates. Digest this for a moment:
![]()
I don't disagree. I just think that it is a factor in people's career choices.
I would also like to do internal medicine/infectious disease, so I'm right there with you on the lower end of the payscale. This is even one subspecialty where extra training does not equal higher salary. 🙁
Yeah, but the best generally rise to the top. Average salaries are just that, averages.
that's a good point.
and my mom thinks i'm smart so who knows how far i'll go . . .. haha j/k
Hey guys,
Please don't flame me for asking this question, because I truly believe MD=DO, but it IS harder to gain entry into a super-competitive allo specialty with a DO as opposed to MD.
This is NOT an MD vs. DO thread and I'm posting it here because I want opinions from those who are leaning towards the MD.
I was speaking to my physician and I mentioned that I am considering going to osteopathic school. After telling him about my personal statistics, he basically advised me to do an SMP and re-apply to MD schools because he thought I was a borderline candidate at this point and if I applied to schools after an SMP I would probably have a good chance to gain entry into an allo school.
Here's the thing: I graduated 1 year ago so taking an extra yr off would put me a little more behind. I really want to start my career but at the same time I really want a good shot at some of the more competitive specialties.
So do you think I should risk it with the SMP?
i think you mean OD
If you don't like DO schools or don't want to convince people you are relevant, then don't go to DO schools at all. If you do, you will regret it.
I want to get into MD schools 'cuz I think they are simply better. But if I can't get into a MD school, I will fall back to a DO school. I really don't mind dancing around the question "Are you a real doctor?"
As long as you have a Dr. in front of your name, patients don't care. I hear that the source of the DO flack is mainly from older MDs, and that it is slowly changing.
Sorry if I'm being repetitive; I did a search but it keeps freezing on me
It's not that I didn't want to continue with DO; it's just that I didn't know it would be impossible to gain entry into certain specialties. I heard it was hard before but my doc basically told me "forget about ophomology, anesthesia, derm"
I may end up wanting to be a family practice doc, but I also want a shot at specialties if I fall in love with one. I don't want to kick myself during my 3rd and 4th year knowing I want to do something, and I may not get it due to my degree...
I counted 99, although these are the ones approved by the American Osteopathic College of Dermatology.
Regardless, there are approximately 1,000 MD dermatology spots, so given that DO's make up 17% of current domestic medical school graduates, one is at a statistical disadvantage as a DO.
Also consider that in 2007, over 50% of graduating osteopaths entered the allopathic match, with 68.8% matching. The match rate for senior allopathic students was 93.4%.
I understand that the burgeoning DOs here are exicted about their future careers and opportunities, but it's sobering to realize that the AOA has been allowing new schools to open without increasing residency positions to accomodate graduates. Digest this for a moment:
![]()
Please try to remember that wiki is not the best source for information when making life decisions.
I'd say that when making life decisions you need as much information as possible.
I wouldn't cite wiki as a research source, and I definitely wouldn't use info from there to make life decisions.
Unless I didn't want to be taken seriously.
Giving up a med school acceptance to do an SMP would be the most ******ed thing you could possibly do.
I'd image that the average D.O would score lower than the average MD on standardized exams, since the requirements to get into a DO program are lower when compared to MD.
That logic is seriously flawed. I'm going DO (more than likely) and I smoked the new MCAT but my undergrad GPA (many years ago) is hovering at a 3.0. My grad GPA is greater than a 3.5. I'll go to bat with anyone on a standardized exam. There are many more requirements to gain entrance to med school aside from the MCAT - ECs, advanced degrees, GPAs, research, publications. I don't think it'd be fair to make generalized statements such as the one you pose here based on the entire formula.
When you say D.Os do not do so well in Allo-matches, are D.O applicants credentials(grades & test scores) equivalent to the average M.D. applying for the same position, and, therefore, D.Os are being discriminated by their degree/education? Or are D.Os not matching as well because of their lower test scores? Id image that the average D.O would score lower than the average MD on standardized exams, since the requirements to get into a DO program are lower when compared to MD.
That logic is seriously flawed. I'm going DO (more than likely) and I smoked the new MCAT but my undergrad GPA (many years ago) is hovering at a 3.0. My grad GPA is greater than a 3.5. I'll go to bat with anyone on a standardized exam. There are many more requirements to gain entrance to med school aside from the MCAT - ECs, advanced degrees, GPAs, research, publications. I don't think it'd be fair to make generalized statements such as the one you pose here based on the entire formula.