- Joined
- Oct 29, 2006
- Messages
- 14,647
- Reaction score
- 43
Well, we need to hear something from the residents and the supervisors. If they are not going to defend themselves then they look pretty guilty. Also, I don't think Dr. Head will go through all of this if it wasn't true. His reputation is at stake here.
It sounds like you're focusing on the gorilla incident, and while that's terrible and shouldn't be tolerated, it's not the most important part of this story. Yes it's blatant racism and should probably be punished, but that happens every day and while it's terrible, it's the actions of one person, not an institution; the LA wave article discussed some people present being upset about it.
The bigger issue here, if true, is the fact that he complained about discrimination and was retaliated against, which is illegal, and the institution supposedly did nothing about it. I find this much harder to believe, especially if they'd conducted an internal investigation. UCLA has good lawyers and anyone can see that this suit would make the institution look very bad. They obviously had the opportunity to fire a few people and/or settle with him quietly as these things happened 6 years ago and they've had a lot of time to look at the situation.
Therefore, either they think the claims are without merit and they'd rather fight them in court and be vindicated, or they're wrong, and stupid. I seem to think the first possibility is more likely, but who knows.
I don't doubt that his two supervisors might have made racist comments, which is terrible. The question is whether their negative evaluations towards him were only due to his race and not due to his performance, which is going to be a core issue at the trial if one happens.