- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 256
- Reaction score
- 3
What do you suggest? I always thought square toes were the preferred style.
oxford?
What do you suggest? I always thought square toes were the preferred style.
By the way, I am planning on wearing the power glove on my interviews.
I think a TV-fold white linen square is always appropriate interview attire, but I know it's been debated ad nauseum by people more qualified than myself.
I was under the impression that socks matched the color of the trousers and not the shoes. Charcoal suit -> charcoal socks, although I don't think anyone would notice the difference between solid black socks and solid charcoal socks.
Other than that, I agree with most everything else. While I don't think most interviewers will care what people wear as long as it isn't absurd, it doesn't hurt to know what is appropriate and "correct" from a historical standpoint. There are always subconscious impressions that dictated by aesthetics (fit, color, coordination, etc.) and on the off chance that you get an interviewer that would be put off by french cuffs or a pinstripes, atleast you'll be as prepared. It's kind of like a tattoo - some people might not care that it's there, but you probably don't want to be showing it off to a room of 40 or 50-something year olds that are judging your fate .
This has nothing to do with the current topic...
but the sense of humor on SF is so much better than the sense of humor here.
This has nothing to do with the current topic...
but the sense of humor on SF is so much better than the sense of humor here.
By the way, I am planning on wearing the power glove on my interviews.
Well considering the contrasting predicaments I would think so.
If humor truly is a sign of intelligence, then this place should be hilarious. But all we get are references to gilly suits and Nintendo power gloves.
There are words for people who exhibit such behavior. "Fake," "pompous," and "superficial" come to mind.At SF, they love themselves enough to be self-aggrandizing and self-deprecating at the same time.
There are words for people who exhibit such behavior. "Fake," "pompous," and "superficial" come to mind.
"...and he had the nerve to come to my party wearing Ralph Lauren! Can you believe it? Hellloooo nineties!"
Ha ha, the suit I'm probably going to buy is a Ralph Lauren. It's really nice, though, and not many manufacturers make stuff in a 42 XL (a 40 XL is really my size, but NO ONE makes that). It sucks being tall and thin.
I personally enjoy more nuanced humor over the "omgwtfbbq lookz @ this guy he shoe dont match lulz' style. Sorry if we don't live up to the comedy legend standards of your fashion forum, I hear Jerry Seinfeld got his start over there. I guess I will have to continue pursuing medicine until I get discovered.
But please look in the mirror. If you're so snooty as to ignore advice from better informed people and to attack back with ad hominem attacks of classism, should you be a doctor? Even doctors who are not well informed about a particular ailment will refer to another doctor.
Better informed because they say they are? What makes one better informed in fashion? It's all discretionary -- There's no 'right' answer in terms of dress and style, otherwise we would all look the same. In medicine, however, there is a right answer.
I wear a 42 XL as well, it truly sucks. Long Arms FTL
I got flat front on my new suit because I also prefer them, but as long as they don't look like MC Hammer pants, it shouldn't matter. I don't think I'd pay any more to make them flat front. I have a pleated front suit and it looks fine and doesn't cause any problems.What do you guys think is better: pleated or flatfront pants? I personally prefer flatfront but the suit I'm getting comes with pleated pants. I can get them to make them flatfront for $35...
heres my type of suit...
I wish my suit was that nice. I almost went for a heavily-discounted Brooks Brothers suit during their winter sale (half off!), but I opted for economy and went with Nautica which I still find pretty decent.Ha ha, the suit I'm probably going to buy is a Ralph Lauren. It's really nice, though, and not many manufacturers make stuff in a 42 XL (a 40 XL is really my size, but NO ONE makes that). It sucks being tall and thin.
I'm stocky myself, so I need a 17.5" neck with 34-35" sleeves.I wish my suit was that nice. I almost went for a heavily-discounted Brooks Brothers suit during their winter sale (half off!), but I opted for economy and went with Nautica which I still find pretty decent.
I feel you on the weird sizes thing, though. I'm fairly stocky (5'8"-5'9", 185 with not much body fat at all) and it's really hard to find 33" shirts with 17" necks.
"So, hants, why do you think your a good fit for UC...wait, where'd he go??"
Okay, you win.
------------
I finally decided on an outfit and I want to know what you guys think?
By the way, I am planning on wearing the power glove on my interviews.[/IMG]
Other than the tie bar - great choice for interviewing. Nice example of a suit with a ticket pocket. Shorten the tie a bit, and consider a Pratt knot or half-Windsor for that collar, since the four-in-hand looks a bit lost in the semi-spread collar.
Sleeve length looks great with just a hint of cuff showing.
Good choice on shoes - just remember to match belt with shoes.
Good luck on interviewing, and if you don't get in the first time - tell them you'll just interview again, until you get in. I would say you look more professionally dressed than 80-90% of the other applicants.
Other gentlemen on the forum - pay attention - CaptainNerd has it down perfectly. This is where you should aim.
oh my god this thread is adorable!
I'm sorry but I just think that is not a good looking ensemble at all.
Yeah...black, gray, and pink? That suit is spectacular, but the shirt and tie leave a lot to be desired, in my opinion.I'm sorry but I just think that is not a good looking ensemble at all.
To be honest, I could say the same thing about black suites. You're taking a risk because you look like every other boring ass student intent on sucking up to admissions committees. When kids in NON-black suites come in, the committees are probably like,"Hey! This kid is different!"Everytime I went to an interview, all the guys wore black. (and ofcourse everytime we walked past a group of students/faculty they would call out, "where's the funeral?")
You're taking a risk if you go in anything but black. But it helps you stand out. Like I said though, it's a risk. The only thing I did to make myself stand out a bit was to wear a white/silver tie and a dark gray dress shirt under my suit.
Okay, what about his?
Whew...blue socks. No thanks. That first suit is really killer. I'd go with that if at all possible.
To be honest, I could say the same thing about black suites. You're taking a risk because you look like every other boring ass student intent on sucking up to admissions committees. When kids in NON-black suites come in, the committees are probably like,"Hey! This kid is different!"
It's not like they are going to think poorly of you for wearing a completely professional business suit that isn't black, or navy blue.
What do you guys think is better: pleated or flatfront pants? I personally prefer flatfront but the suit I'm getting comes with pleated pants. I can get them to make them flatfront for $35...
I like nice things - clothes, in this case - just as much as anyone else, but man, blue socks? Seriously? I don't think my dad would leave the house in blue socks, and he wears undershirts and bathing suits everywhere he goes.Damn, all of a sudden, you guys have become total divas.