Originally posted by Thaxil
I originally thought that schools care if your background was disadvantaged or what your story is, but I have become a bit skeptical of there statements regarding this. If there was one thing I do regret from the admission process is mentioning my background in the personal statement. I should of kept everything rosy and peachy. I really think they don't care at all about that stuff. I think there definition of disadvantage = Black or Hispanic or what ever underrepresented group. I do not think disadvantage can mean dirt poor white dude. Basically if you have a poor GPA do not expect them to say, ?well he is a first generation college student from a very poor and large family and worked thoughout college so this is understandable.? Sorry, I have a problem with complaining.
Anyways, I do not think tell someone with a 2.7 gpa that they need at least 20?s on the DAT is hardline. What do you expect? Do you think you with get accepted because kids throw rocks at you when you were younger.
714guy,
I would suggest that you take the required course at the UC system. I know it is significantly more expense then CalState and surely more then CC. However, admissions is all about proving your self with out a doubt competent. Thus, if they are unaware of the CC you attend, they will not respect your grades that are obtained. For instance, you have a 2.9 GPA for the four years in school, then you attend an unknown CC and get all A?s in the required courses. What do you think is the thought that will arise. Take the course at UC and get good grades to prove your capabilities. You can also do this on the DAT. Remember there are 3 GPA that D-school consider. Overall GPA, sci-GPA and BCP-GPA, and the required course are in BCP and other difficult course like Biochemistry that you will take in D-schoool. So, I think your grade received course consider for the BCP is highly reguarded.