Here is what I think about the test (in reverse order):
Biological Sciences: I might have taken 35-40 full lengths in the past 5 months, and I have NEVER seen that many experiment passages on one Bio section, in any medium (TPR, EC, Barron's, even frickin AAMC). NEVER. It must have taken me twelve minutes to get past the first experimental passage. The good news - I took my time with it and I THINK I got all but one. The bad news - if that is the "traditional" experimental one (which I think, if they still do that with one of the passages, it HAS to be) then all of that effort was for nothing. There was an experimental passage on menstruation that was much easier that I didn't finish thanks to the first passage. The level of understanding that it takes to answer qualitative questions regarding those knockout mice would have taken a MASTERS level research student an hour - let alone undergrads. Despite that, I thought the Orgo was alot but fair. There was just not enough time to do more than two full mechanism analyses, but I got to them (though missed the NMR question, I think). Why so many experiments? To be honest, I think I did ok, but you never quite know.
Verbal - The first two passages were a blur. I don't even know if I remember either of them. The MCAT is NOT the place to try new speed reading methods, and I learned that quickly after the first passage. The subject matter seemed an easy enough read, but the questions were RIDICULOUS for the first passage. How do you make hard questions for an easy passage? I had a nice rhythm during Passages 3-7.5 but had to guess on the last two. As always, Verbal is a wash - my range could literally be anywhere from 11 to a 6 lol. SDN actually made me more anxious than I thought I would be, so I guess I should have just stuck to what works for me (which I did after the debacle of the first two passages). I guess we'll see.
Physical Sci - I don't remember most of the passages, which I think is a good thing. If one sticks out, that meant it was extremely hard. I don't actually remember using more than two BASIC physics formulas, and none of the motion stuff (besides harmonic, though I think most of those were all qualitative). One weird Galileo passage that had nothing to do with gravity, which slayed me. Didn't agree with the answer to one of the questions regarding light, even after I worked it out (at least I think I deduced the answer- after the section was over, of course). Another random comparison of v and a, but I think I just thought through that one. The physics stuff was minimal, and I think that is a good thing since you don't use Physics in medical school except for the blood pressure/flow stuff in Physiology. To be honest, I don't know what to expect from this section. I felt horrible after I did it (which may have played into the beginning of Verbal) but afterwards I feel good about it. Oh yeah - WTF is "precipitation dissociation"?
In conclusion, I think that this test could have been ALOT more difficult. Not to say I did exceptionally well, but the Phys section was not as bad as I anticipated it was going to be. Believe me, I was ready for ANYTHING - I had heard/read too many horror stories. The experiment-ridden Bio section was tough, but all of the questions were straightforward (except for the knockout mice, which in my humble opinion, is the worst passage I have EVER encountered before). I don't know if there is an actual curve, and I am not sure if they still do the experimental additions. Can anyone confirm this? All in all, I'm hoping for the best.