You're right; she's only a ten-year-old kid, and the article about her is a cute piece of fluff. The problem with it is people seeing the headline "10-year-old veterinarian." Are we working our butts off to get into a profession that a 10-year-old could do? Nope. It kind of demeans the profession, which is my major issue with it.
I think it's great that she wants to be a vet. I don't see her as competition or as a threat. I knew I wanted to be a veterinarian before I was 10, but I started volunteering at a zoo (cleaning cages, mind you) when I was 13. I didn't get a tech job until I was 16. And the clinic where I work now doesn't hire anyone under 18 because of insurance reasons. My point is, at 10, she is not responsible or mature enough to be trusted with most of the duties of being a tech, not to mention the physical limitations of her height and size- can you picture her holding a rottweiler for a blood draw?
It's a cute little interest piece, but it's majorly skewed and a lot of the facts are jumbled around. Like how they use veterinary assistant and veterinarian interchangeably. 🙄