Interview is low-key. You meet in Cindy Warren's (Assistant Dean for Admissions) office with (most likely) the other interviewee. You'll then have two separate, back-to-back interviews with one member of the admissions committee. As is fairly typical in my interview experience at other schools, they'll give you the spiel that they're there to get to know you and that they'll be acting as your "advocate to the ADCOM." After the second interview, you'll go back to Cindy's office where she'll give you and the other interviewee (two applicants are interviewed during the same block of time; you'll switch interviewers with the other applicant) an opportunity to ask questions. It's a fairly un-elaborate interview process.
As for morale, it seems good. The LCME matter seems to be a non-issue for current students. I haven't heard the subject discussed at all. There is, for all practical purposes, essentially a zero-chance of being dis-accredited, and probably just as importantly, it seems also to be a non-issue for residency programs. The last several years residency placements have been good, with a (growing) number of students matching into competitive residencies and/or well-known programs. In terms of applicants and matriculants, over the past five years, average MCAT scores of entering classes have increased every year--last year, it was near 30 (compare that ~25-26 in 2006). All of the new third years passed step 1 on their first attempt this past summer; average score (219) was just above the national average for domestic allopathic schools.