- Joined
- Jul 1, 2008
- Messages
- 1,856
- Reaction score
- 91
Yeah. Sept 15ish or so. Are you on your research year?Good Luck NTF - three weeks or so, right?
Yeah. Sept 15ish or so. Are you on your research year?Good Luck NTF - three weeks or so, right?
Hello everyone,
I am in a similar situation of not having an adviser to ask questions to, (I did a self made post-bac).
I am a little nervous I'm missing something. I applied to 10 schools when I got verified on august 12th. I got most of my secondaries within 24 hours (about 8). I submitted immediately, but I have only received one email saying my application was complete. How long does it usually take to process after you pay? For example NY medical college says it has not received my LORs but I know they're just waiting in AMCAS.
I have since added 4 schools because it seems like many people apply for 20 and 10 seemed like maybe too few. Should I apply to more before it gets too late?
My stats are listed earlier in this thread, but the summary:
32R
3.8 undergrad GPA, non science major (computer science minor)
Science GPA 4.0 (all except one taken at CC because I live 1+hrs from the closest 4yr state school. The CC I went to is considered one of the colleges of science for the state and has special transfer agreements with top schools for science. It was one of a handful of CCs certified as equivalent to 4year science credits by the state medical school if that matters at all.
My ECs seem solid to me- tons of paid and unpaid clinical experience over last 2 years.
My current job is in IT for a major teaching hospital. I also have been a panelists at HIMSS for training physicians on EHR/EMR implementation. I also started a moderately successful health IT startup 2 years ago and am currently working on a HIT research project related to my startup with Sloan Kettering.
Do you think 14 schools are enough, and when should I expect my applications to be under review having submitted 2 weeks ago?
Sent from my ADR6400L using SDN Mobile
Hi fellow nontrads !
I still have about 10+ secondaries left to do (why oh why did I leave all the HARD ones for last?). I've been rejected from 3 schools pre-secondary, still waiting to hear from one more that pre-screens, put on hold for CCLCM <cries>, but I'm excited for my first two interviews next week!
In your opinion, what sort of EC's are considered desirable by an AdCom?
It can take quite a while for applications to be marked complete at this stage. I wouldn't worry about it. For the most part, an actual person has to look at your file and make sure everything is in order, and that takes time, unfortunately. I would give it a couple more weeks before worrying. Good luck!
-Clinical Experience that is actually hands on in some form is very beneficial.
I still have about 10+ secondaries left to do (why oh why did I leave all the HARD ones for last?)
I totally know the feeling! SDN is making me stress about where I should be in the process, so it's kind of nice to see someone else still working on secondaries when I thought I was the only one. Good luck finishing those up!
Up to 3 interviews now!!! YAY!
Oooh, I hear that's a pretty nice program. Too bad. Are you from Michigan?...I've been rejected from 3 schools pre-secondary, still waiting to hear from one more that pre-screens, put on hold for CCLCM <cries>, but I'm excited for my first two interviews next week!
Where do you think that the typical applicant is obtaining the "hands on clinical experience" that you talk of?
Thank you for that reply. I ask the question about "clinical experience" because as a registered nurse and a paramedic, I have had much hands-on clinical experience. I have gone so far as to spending 3 years assisting in surgery (which was noted in my application essays). Yet nobody has every asked me about this experience. Instead, they seem to prefer to focus on what I perceive to be less relevant things such as my hobby as a radio control helicopter pilot. I am beginning to feel that perhaps my clinical experience was in some way inadequate--and that other applicants had "better" clinical experience.
Oooh, I hear that's a pretty nice program. Too bad. Are you from Michigan?
Is it safe to say that having hands-on clinical experience makes no difference to an AdCom? Because I know many a premed who struggled to find physicians to shadow. Perhaps they should have focused their time on other things instead?
How about research experience? What is considered sufficient? A PhD?
How about research experience? What is considered sufficient? A PhD?
Reading old threads is no substitute for an ongoing discussion about topics relevant to all of us.
This thread is entitled "2013 Nontrad Applicants' Progress Thread". Therefore it can be assumed that the topic for discussion is about nontraditional applicants applying in 2013.
What wastes my time is reading a post by someone who says, "I just got denied to 3 osteopathic schools". That's the kind of information that should be shared with your grandmother, and not with the rest of us. We are not your pitty party.
What matters is the reason you got denied. What happened in your interview? What questions did they ask? Did they look highly upon your Iraq war medic experience? Did they look negatively on your previous bank teller position? Can you explain to us in further detail what was good or bad about your application?
Using the search function, and reading through a 2007 non-trad application thread is of course useful, but has little bearing on what is happening in September of 2012. Faculty and ad-com membership changes from cycle to cycle. School mission statements change from year to year. Opinions change daily.
There is nothing more valuable than finding out a person's opinion on such matters as "what constitutes good clinical experience" or "what constitutes good research experience" the moment that person leaves the campus at which they are interviewing.
So when I ask what someone's current opinion is on what constitutes "adequate research experience", this applies specifically to their experience in a September 2012 interview (and not what they read about from a 2005 or 2006 thread). An appropriate response would be something like, "I had an interview to TCOM yesterday (September 1st)--they seemed to like my undergraduate research experience in a neuroscience lab where I sequenced the DNA for zebrafish--what they didn't seem to like was my experience volunteering at a community mental health clinic".
Well, it is usually for people applying for matriculation in Summer/Fall of 2013. But in reality - some context should be given: This forum represents the entire breadth and depth of nontrads at EVERY stage of the journey. While it is "filed" under pre-med we are in fact a welcoming and open community of students at every stage of the journey across all fields (just check out our surveys to get some appreciation of who posts here. This is what sets us apart from most other parts of SDN. So - it isn't uncommon for folks like NTF, Q, Shy, and myself to post updates for our applications to jobs, residencies, or otherwise contribute too.This thread is entitled "2013 Nontrad Applicants' Progress Thread". Therefore it can be assumed that the topic for discussion is about nontraditional applicants applying in 2013.
I really have to be honest - I kind of bristled at this remark. I am not sure you should be so quick to say it is a "pitty party".What wastes my time is reading a post by someone who says, "I just got denied to 3 osteopathic schools". That's the kind of information that should be shared with your grandmother, and not with the rest of us. We are not your pitty party.
We have a interview feedback system, in case you didn't know. It can be found at the top of the page in the tab next to the "Articles & Interview" tab. I encourage people to contribute and read that as well.👍What matters is the reason you got denied. What happened in your interview? What questions did they ask? Did they look highly upon your Iraq war medic experience? Did they look negatively on your previous bank teller position? Can you explain to us in further detail what was good or bad about your application?
Using the search function, and reading through a 2007 non-trad application thread is of course useful, but has little bearing on what is happening in September of 2012. Faculty and ad-com membership changes from cycle to cycle. School mission statements change from year to year. Opinions change daily.
Meh - I think you will find that applicants are often the worst at evaulating their own performance at interview day.There is nothing more valuable than finding out a person's opinion on such matters as "what constitutes good clinical experience" or "what constitutes good research experience" the moment that person leaves the campus at which they are interviewing.
Again, I would suggest 1) you check out the interview feedback pages and 2) applicants are notoriously bad evaluators of their own interview performance.So when I ask what someone's current opinion is on what constitutes "adequate research experience", this applies specifically to their experience in a September 2012 interview (and not what they read about from a 2005 or 2006 thread). An appropriate response would be something like, "I had an interview to TCOM yesterday (September 1st)--they seemed to like my undergraduate research experience in a neuroscience lab where I sequenced the DNA for zebrafish--what they didn't seem to like was my experience volunteering at a community mental health clinic".
This thread is entitled "2013 Nontrad Applicants' Progress Thread". Therefore it can be assumed that the topic for discussion is about nontraditional applicants applying in 2013.
What wastes my time is reading a post by someone who says, "I just got denied to 3 osteopathic schools". That's the kind of information that should be shared with your grandmother, and not with the rest of us. We are not your pitty party.
What matters is the reason you got denied. What happened in your interview? What questions did they ask? Did they look highly upon your Iraq war medic experience? Did they look negatively on your previous bank teller position? Can you explain to us in further detail what was good or bad about your application?
Using the search function, and reading through a 2007 non-trad application thread is of course useful, but has little bearing on what is happening in September of 2012. Faculty and ad-com membership changes from cycle to cycle. School mission statements change from year to year. Opinions change daily.
There is nothing more valuable than finding out a person's opinion on such matters as "what constitutes good clinical experience" or "what constitutes good research experience" the moment that person leaves the campus at which they are interviewing.
So when I ask what someone's current opinion is on what constitutes "adequate research experience", this applies specifically to their experience in a September 2012 interview (and not what they read about from a 2005 or 2006 thread). An appropriate response would be something like, "I had an interview to TCOM yesterday (September 1st)--they seemed to like my undergraduate research experience in a neuroscience lab where I sequenced the DNA for zebrafish--what they didn't seem to like was my experience volunteering at a community mental health clinic".
What do you guys think of the importance of having a nice suit for the mmi interviews. I only applied to two schools and they both use the mmi. I have a suit that is pretty old but still fits. My thinking was that I would not be scrutinized as closely for my appearance in the mmi format. Should I buy a new suit or not, and yes money is tight three kids and stay at home wife. Thanks in advance for your opinions.
What do you guys think of the importance of having a nice suit for the mmi interviews. I only applied to two schools and they both use the mmi. I have a suit that is pretty old but still fits. My thinking was that I would not be scrutinized as closely for my appearance in the mmi format. Should I buy a new suit or not, and yes money is tight three kids and stay at home wife. Thanks in advance for your opinions.
As we are now in Sep., isn't it time to start up the 2013 interview thread? I'm curious where my fellow non-trads will be heading for interviews!
Non-trad, 41 years old. High school science teacher for 18 years. 3.6 GPA, 31R MCAT.
Similar here. 🙂 You've got a few years on me (but not many!). I used to teach HS science. 3.6/32.
👍
Ha ha. That is funny. We are almost the same stats. 👍
I have been trying to play the teacher card throughout my applications. One of my favorite lines in my secondaries that I used over and over is "In the original Latin, the term doctor means teacher. I have been preparing to be a doctor for the past eighteen years by being a high school science teacher...."
What classes have you taught? My degree was in bio with a minor in chem. I could not find a job teaching biology, but I could find one teaching chemistry. So I became the chemistry teacher. I have also taught biology, physics, advanced chemistry (both AP and IB), and astronomy. Two years ago I also taught two semesters of Health II.
Good luck to you.
dsoz
Former teacher myself, but the little folks. At different points, 1st, 2nd, 4th and 5th grades.
Bio bachelor degree in 2009 with 3.5 gpa. Medical science masters degree graduated in 2011 with a higher gpa. Overall 3.6 in accomas. 24 mcat. I retook it last week.
I was wait-listed last year in MSUCOM. I applied late. They received everything on October. I applied extremely early and finished my secondary early July this year.
I'm giving up after this year. I've always wanted to become a doctor but I can't waste more years of
My life trying to get accepted in these programs. I have to start paying off my school loans while working at the hospital. I need hope and I wish this is my year.