- Joined
- Apr 21, 2011
- Messages
- 3,610
- Reaction score
- 9,224
I may be a card carrying liberal, but what happened to personal responsibility here? The decision to live rurally has pros (more space, cleaner environment, cheaper housing etc) and cons, one of which is more difficult access to high level care. There is not and shouldn’t be a right to tertiary level care in your backyard.
So yes, some patients will defer care, or delay care if they have to travel an hour Or 2 or 3 to see a (linac, urologist, surgical oncologist, etc). That is a personal decision. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do our best to help them through telemedicine, consolidating appointments, hypoFx, etc, but at some point we have to accept that we are their doctors, not their parents.
Ummm. Rich people in the country in America get health care. There is no need to worry about them. Similarly, rich people in the city send their kids to decent schools. This is distinctly not what I’m talking about.Agree. If they can, they should. agreement. If they are choosing to live somewhere with terrible schools and have a way out, but choose not to, that’s their problem.
Is this the same as people who have
money, buy a plot of land 2 hours outside of Denver and expect high level care?
I hear so many times from my long distance patients (1-2 hours away) - “I would never live in ____”. Even though it’s cheaper to live in the city or near it.