- Joined
- Mar 11, 2020
- Messages
- 429
- Reaction score
- 413
- Points
- 916
- Resident [Any Field]
Exactly. There are very few (if any at all) in anesthesia or radiology making 250-275k working full time yet it is our average.Haha I may have missed that part but again it’s misleading to discuss being self employed, we are talking about the average psychiatrist versus the average anesthesia or surgeon etc, if they wanted to be self employed and owned surgery centers they’d make 1.5M but again that’s not the typical the typical is 450k for them vs 250k for us..I agree with you though being employed you won’t make much compared to what you could make on your own and in a good environment
Exactly. There are very few (if any at all) in anesthesia or radiology making 250-275k working full time yet it is our average.
As was previously mentioned, why can't you just take two inpatient jobs and work better than surgery hours for 5-600k? What other fields of medicine can you work two full time jobs for 40-50 hours a week?
Exactly. There are very few (if any at all) in anesthesia or radiology making 250-275k working full time yet it is our average.
It's hard doing this long term on a w2 basis, employers will start messing with your schedule, increase your patient load based on the needs of the facility, etc.
Locums boards are pretty much empty in the Midwest, so don't count on that to make bank.
I doubt it. In fact, most of my co-residents seemed to gravitate toward fellowship and lower paying academic jobs. My peers at work come from all kinds of institutions. I only added the fact about myself to illustrate that residency reputation isn't impeding my job search.
if they wanted to be self employed and owned surgery centers they’d make 1.5M but again that’s not the typical the typical is 450k for them vs 250k for us.
I guess that's the problem with the term Midwest. I've been keeping an eye out for postings in a three state area on locumtenens just in case something amazing shows up. However, I'll add that I haven't been looking tooo hard since I'm fairly content where I am right now.Not sure what boards you're looking at, but I'm getting plenty of postings from recruiters for $300k+/yr jobs in the midwest. I actually got 3 last week within 50 miles of where I'm living...
I guess that's the problem with the term Midwest. I've been keeping an eye out for postings in a three state area on locumtenens just in case something amazing shows up. However, I'll add that I haven't been looking tooo hard since I'm fairly content where I am right now.
What’s the deal with the 0.5M job?I mean recruiter jobs are usually crap but since the recruiters won't leave my google voice text number alone....
Midwest Region- 0.5M
Metro DC- $316,000/yr
Milwaukee and Madison areas- $450,000
Green Bay, WI- $361,000
Dauphin County, PA- $250,000
Hudson Valley, NY- $250,000
Sonoma County, CA- $340,000
Chicagoland, IL- $350,000
Asheville, NC- $300,000+
King of Prussia, PA- $300,000
Above MGMA western philly suburbs 7 on 7 off- Yr 1 guaranteed comp $340,000, $30,000 in retention bonus year after year
I no joke get **** in the mail AT MY HOME ADDRESS somehow like every week trying to entice me to come out to some "top 10 places to live in the US" for "300K+ per year"
Again I would probably not take any of these jobs because there's a reason they're desperately fishing for people.
idk ask comphealthWhat’s the deal with the 0.5M job?
I haven’t seen any jobs with that high of income guaranteed before either I feel we should have a thread to post these jobs in and discuss them, I think anesthesia has a similar thread where they either praise or bash different jobs could be good for a lot of the new grads and young attendings not yet establishedidk ask comphealth
I haven’t seen any jobs with that high of income guaranteed before either I feel we should have a thread to post these jobs in and discuss them, I think anesthesia has a similar thread where they either praise or bash different jobs could be good for a lot of the new grads and young attendings not yet established
When they don't even name the state, gives you a pretty good idea how undesirable the location is. There are shockingly only a handful of states in the country that don't have a single good city.When they don’t list the city, I assume it is in a terrible location. I don’t love the Midwest, so I’m already thinking bad location in a bad region.
When they don’t list the city, I assume it is in a terrible location. I don’t love the Midwest, so I’m already thinking bad location in a bad region.
Not to derail but I’d be curious what your guys’ opinion of this job is, $312k. Their homepage has more information on the facilities.
Just a med student.
I stopped reading at MontanaNot to derail but I’d be curious what your guys’ opinion of this job is, $312k. Their homepage has more information on the facilities.
Just a med student.
I’ve heard from someone who was there as a locums it’s staffed poorly with nurses. Like one RN overseeing a whole 15 bed unit with psych techs (think someone with a high school diploma and basic mental health training) making up the difference. Patients or staff getting assaulted was not uncommon.Not to derail but I’d be curious what your guys’ opinion of this job is, $312k. Their homepage has more information on the facilities.
Just a med student.
Not to derail but I’d be curious what your guys’ opinion of this job is, $312k. Their homepage has more information on the facilities.
Just a med student.
Yeah it’s the only one. Having lived near there the winters can be cold and long (minimal fall and spring seasons, snowfall variable but can be from Halloween to 1st of April). Nice to hear someone had a good experience other than the winters.I’ve heard good things about the Montana State Hospital (or at least 1 of them. Do they have 2?). Friend said the hours were good and the staff cared. He wasn’t a fan of the winters.
I haven’t seen any jobs with that high of income guaranteed before either I feel we should have a thread to post these jobs in and discuss them, I think anesthesia has a similar thread where they either praise or bash different jobs could be good for a lot of the new grads and young attendings not yet established
This set up would be nice but can you find out how the attendings get around treatment team meetings (often in mornings so can't be in 2 places at once), being on-call (hard to round on second hospital when you're on call from the first place and they're constantly calling you), and when admin tries to start asking you to do things like covering the resident clinic in the afternoon, cover the PHP/IOP randomly when there's a need, etc etc? Maybe they have strategies around all thisYou probably know better than I do as I'm just a resident, but the attendings I know who do this don't seem to have any issue with this set up. If the employer doesn't require to be in house for x number of hours seems like it shouldn't be a problem.
Also 15 vacation days each yearWikipedia notes the town in question has no services beyond a single convenience store, a post office, and one solitary bar. So...it'd be quite the experience.
Wouldn't a locums job alleviate most of those issues?This set up would be nice but can you find out how the attendings get around treatment team meetings (often in mornings so can't be in 2 places at once), being on-call (hard to round on second hospital when you're on call from the first place and they're constantly calling you), and when admin tries to start asking you to do things like covering the resident clinic in the afternoon, cover the PHP/IOP randomly when there's a need, etc etc? Maybe they have strategies around all this
The strategies are very simple:This set up would be nice but can you find out how the attendings get around treatment team meetings (often in mornings so can't be in 2 places at once), being on-call (hard to round on second hospital when you're on call from the first place and they're constantly calling you), and when admin tries to start asking you to do things like covering the resident clinic in the afternoon, cover the PHP/IOP randomly when there's a need, etc etc? Maybe they have strategies around all this
There's definitely been attendings who did these things and at least at the for-profit hospital I'm training at, they've all been let go. They also carried that reputation with them and were let go at the OTHER for profit hospital they used to do this at. They did say they hit $600k for a couple years and then were let go. Doesn't seem sustainable long-term.The strategies are very simple:
1) don’t attend the treatment meetings
2) don’t agree to cover the php/iop
3) don’t take call too much although you’ll have to probably once a week at each place
Very true. Our hospital utilized locums doctors who did this but within 6 months, they were replaced by an employed doctor.Wouldn't a locums job alleviate most of those issues?
Maybe don't work for a for-profit hospital. Their job is to squeeze out more profits and eventually get rid of money losing propositions, i.e., you.There's definitely been attendings who did these things and at least at the for-profit hospital I'm training at, they've all been let go. They also carried that reputation with them and were let go at the OTHER for profit hospital they used to do this at. They did say they hit $600k for a couple years and then were let go. Doesn't seem sustainable long-term.
EDIT: to be more accurate, not all of them were "let go" but 1 left b/c all the residents/employed attendings talked crap and I think they felt mistreated. 1 didn't get their contract renewed.
Lol... IM hospitalist here. I have a few FM docs in my hospitalist group who are doing well, and it's a fairly manageable job. We see 16 patients per day plus 1 admit on average and make 330k/yr working 7 days on/off (11 hrs shift). FM/IM docs at my place can make 400k+/yr if they work 17.5 days/month.Any surgical specialty is going to have nights/weekends in house. If a psychiatrist wants to see 40 patients per day and do mediocre work they can and make a lot of money. These other specialties are just usually much busier, like extreme sports, and psych is more like a cup of coffee with a friend. Depends on what you want and what you think is sustainable. Just thank god you didn't go into Family Medicine, or heaven forbid...pediatrics.
inpatient medicine is different. Outpatient primary care, facing 20 minutes followups and an overflowing inbox is the problem. PCP pay should be doubled and cardiology pay slashed IMO.Lol... IM hospitalist here. I have a few FM docs in my hospitalist group who are doing well, and it's a fairly manageable job. We see 16 patients per day plus 1 admit on average and make 330k/yr working 7 days on/off (11 hrs shift). FM/IM docs at my place can make 400k+/yr if they work 17.5 days/month.
inpatient medicine is different. Outpatient primary care, facing 20 minutes followups and an overflowing inbox is the problem. PCP pay should be doubled and cardiology pay slashed IMO.
How are they tolerating their ****ty pay? It’s actually nutslol 20 minute followups? how luxurious...peds clinic was 15 minute followups, 10 min sick visits, hope you're quick with the EMR!
Many FM docs are jumping into the hospitalist bandwagon right now. I guess they are starting to realize that they are getting a bad deal doing outpatient (seeing 25+ patients per day for a salary of 225k/yr). Right now, one can make 300k/yr 7 days on/off without dealing with the 15 minutes follow ups, prior authorization, replying to messages to one's inbox constantly. But the 7 days on/off is not for everyone. Some people LOVE it; others HATE it.inpatient medicine is different. Outpatient primary care, facing 20 minutes followups and an overflowing inbox is the problem. PCP pay should be doubled and cardiology pay slashed IMO.
Yeah but this is not something that any of us graduate residency knowing how to do so not applicable to like 90 percent of psychiatristsYou could get much higher hourly as an expert witness.
Mostly true.Yeah but this is not something that any of us graduate residency knowing how to do so not applicable to like 90 percent of psychiatrists
There are definitely some benefits like space for 2 people costing less than 2x 1 person (same as house/apt), as well as not having to redouble effort for policy, forms, etc. Downside is that all your financial eggs are then in one basket and you may not want to work next to your significant other all day/everyday. With dual physician household you shouldn't need to maximize gain to achieve your financial goals, so I would make sure each of you does the type of practice you most want to do. If that happens to be PP, then sure you would have a leg up on most solo PP folks for cost and effort basis.In your experience, what would be the best way for a married physician couple to maximize lifestyle/compensation in pysch? I imagine that the private practice potential of psych would be best able to take advantage of a couple who are in the same specialty, compared to taking employed positions or joining large PP groups in other specialties. Would that be a correct assumption, or is there little benefit over having a solo practice?
To piggyback off the original question, whats a ballpark rate a psychiatrist can bring in taking insurance, once their practice is up and running? I'm thinking mostly 99214 + 90833. I get it that insurance rates vary wildly, but any chance to provide a ball park? And I imagine we could do two of these per hour (3 seems possible but quality may begin to suffer I imagine)?
You can use CMS reimbursement as a reference point. Median non-facility prices nationally are roughly $133 for 99214 and $72 for 90833. So 99214 + 90833 is about $205 per appointment or $410/hr. See 12 f/ups per day with no new patients (assuming 30min f/ups with some no-shows) and that's $2460/day = $12,300/week. Work 45 weeks per year and that's grossing $553,500.
However, that's assuming everyone is a 99214 + 90833 and that you're fully reimbursed for all of those services billed. You should hopefully be able to get better rates from insurance than CMS, but you're also much less likely to get reimbursed for every service you bill for and will likely have to put in significantly more effort collecting on all those charges. You're also not going to be able to bill everyone at 99214 and are very unlikely to be able to drop the 90833 that frequently. Plus, that's just your gross before all expenses and taxes. Net take-home is going to look very different.
Theoretically, one could make bank with a very reasonable work schedule if everything is able to be optimized with minimal to no hiccups. Realistically, that's never going to happen. It's a lot easier to optimize everything in a cash-only setup where you require patients have a CC on file than to try and give a reasonable ballpark for a practice taking insurance without knowing a lot more specifics.
What you should be asking isn't so much for a general ballpark that we could provide. A better question is how well could you optimize the system you'd work in? Depending on your ability to optimize billing and collections, you can have massive differences (like 6 figure differences for seeing the same # of patients) in what your ballpark income could be.
It is similar everyone is 99214 and half or more are 90833 if you do 30 minute appointmentsThanks for that explanation. Would using a good billing company reduce a lot of non payment and take admin time off my plate? I feel like I write good, efficient notes that covers all the bases. Maybe I'm naively thinking this will result in less hiccups.
In my residency clinic it seems 90% are a 99214. Almost everyone has a couple chronic diagnoses it seems. I was imagining the real world would be similar as well.
Thanks for that explanation. Would using a good billing company reduce a lot of non payment and take admin time off my plate? I feel like I write good, efficient notes that covers all the bases. Maybe I'm naively thinking this will result in less hiccups.
In my residency clinic it seems 90% are a 99214. Almost everyone has a couple chronic diagnoses it seems. I was imagining the real world would be similar as well.